数智赋能如何驱动区域医药制造业创新?——一个基于TOEP框架的研究
How Does Digital Intelligence Empowerment Drive Innovation in Regional Pharmaceutical Manufacturing?—A Study Based on the TOEP Framework
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.153305, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 彭学兵, 宿婧文*:浙江理工大学经济管理学院,浙江 杭州;刘玥伶:浙江经贸职业技术学院工商管理学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 数智赋能医药制造业创新绩效TOEP框架组态路径Digital-Intelligence Empowerment Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Innovation Performance TOEP Framework Configurational Pathways
摘要: 医药制造业作为实现“制造强国”与“健康中国”战略的关键领域,其创新绩效提升亟需数智赋能驱动。然而,现有研究对数智赋能区域医药制造业的组态路径与多重因果机制缺乏深入探讨。本文基于技术–组织–环境–进程(TOEP)整合框架,采用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法,以我国31个省级区域为案例,实证检验数智赋能区域医药制造业创新绩效的多元驱动机制。研究发现:(1) 区域医药制造业高创新绩效存在“技术–进程”双元驱动、“技术–组织–进程”三元协同、“技术–组织–环境–进程”四元并进三类组态路径,技术与进程是构成高创新绩效路径的普遍基础,但其效能最大化依赖于与组织、环境要素的系统协同;(2) 数智赋能路径呈现显著的区域异质性,领先地区依托全要素协同构建创新生态,其他地区则可通过强化技术与进程等核心组合,并辅以组织规模或环境基建等差异化条件实现高绩效,体现了基于禀赋的战略选择;(3) 高水平创新绩效的实现存在“殊途同归”的演化路径,各地区可通过要素强化与组合优化,实现从低阶路径向高阶协同路径的动态跃迁。研究结论从组态视角揭示了数智赋能区域医药制造业创新的复杂机理与多元路径,为实施差异化、精准化的区域产业政策提供了理论依据与实践启示。
Abstract: As a pivotal sector for realizing the “Manufacturing Power” and “Healthy China” strategies, pharmaceutical manufacturing urgently requires digital-intelligence enablement to enhance innovation performance. However, existing research lacks in-depth exploration of the configurational pathways and multiple causal mechanisms through which digital-intelligence enablement drives regional pharmaceutical manufacturing innovation. Grounded in the integrated Technology-Organization-Environment-Process (TOEP) framework, this study employs fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) and examines 31 provincial-level regions in China to empirically test the multiple driving mechanisms of digital-intelligence enablement for regional pharmaceutical manufacturing innovation performance. The findings reveal that: (1) High innovation performance in regional pharmaceutical manufacturing manifests through three configurational pathways: “Technology-Process” dual-driven, “Technology-Organization-Process” triadic synergy, and “Technology-Organization-Environment-Process” quadruple parallel advancement. Technology and Process constitute common foundations for high-performance pathways, yet their effectiveness maximizes only through systematic synergy with Organization and Environment elements; (2) Digital-intelligence enablement pathways exhibit significant regional heterogeneity—leading regions construct innovation ecosystems through comprehensive factor coordination, while other regions can achieve high performance by strengthening core combinations such as Technology-Process, supplemented by differentiated conditions like organizational scale or environmental infrastructure, reflecting strategic choices based on resource endowments; (3) The realization of high-level innovation performance demonstrates equifinality in evolutionary pathways, whereby various regions can achieve dynamic transitions from lower-order to higher-order synergistic pathways through element strengthening and combination optimization. These conclusions reveal the complex mechanisms and multiple pathways of digital-intelligence enabled innovation in regional pharmaceutical manufacturing from a configurational perspective, providing theoretical grounding and practical implications for implementing differentiated and precision-oriented regional industrial policies.
文章引用:彭学兵, 宿婧文, 刘玥伶. 数智赋能如何驱动区域医药制造业创新?——一个基于TOEP框架的研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(3): 543-554. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.153305

参考文献

[1] 王学恭. 加快生物医药创新升级促进生物经济高质量发展[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2022, 42(5): 8-9.
[2] 郭朝先, 石博涵. 中国医药产业国际竞争力评估与“十四五”时期高质量发展对策[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 21(3): 65-79.
[3] 孟维福, 韩克勇, 陈阳. 自主创新、结构优化与经济高质量发展[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 39(1): 114-126.
[4] 曾德明, 罗侦, 文金艳, 等. 权变视角下知识重组对技术创新质量的影响——基于中国医药制造业企业的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(9): 87-97.
[5] Chatzifoti, N., Didaskalou, E.A., Chountalas, P.T., Agoraki, K.K. and Georgakellos, D.A. (2024) The Role of Information Technology and Employee Engagement in Enhancing Knowledge Management in the Pharmaceutical Research and Development Process: Insights from Dynamic Capabilities Theory. Businesses, 4, 315-330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 朱旺旺, 陶群山, 陶世奇, 等. 技术-组织-环境框架下知识优势对医药制造业创新绩效的组态分析[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2024, 33(10): 961-970.
[7] Gao, X. and Chen, Y. (2022) Research on the Function of Government Fund Support in Pharmaceutical Industry Technology Innovation. Pharmacology & Pharmacy, 13, 471-482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Gu, Y. and Zhuang, Q. (2024) Research on the Impact of China’s Reform to Delegate Power, Streamline Administration, and Optimize Government Services on the Technology Innovation Efficiency of the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, Article 1325298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 欧春尧, 邵业, 曹阳春, 等. 数智赋能下海上风电产业创新生态系统演化过程研究——基于明阳智能的扎根分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(15): 128-137.
[10] 黄奕宁. 数智时代下民族医药产业创新发展: 现实困境、内在逻辑与实现路径[J]. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化, 2024, 26(7): 1735-1741.
[11] Soni, S.J. and Patel, A.N. (2024) Digital Transformation and Industry 4.0 in Pharma Manufacturing: The Role of IoT, AI, and Big Data. Journal of Integral Sciences, 7, 1-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 谭海波, 范梓腾, 杜运周. 技术管理能力、注意力分配与地方政府网站建设——一项基于TOE框架的组态分析[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(9): 81-94.
[13] 钱海章, 肖婧舒, 李思成, 等. 数字化转型与企业创新——来自中国生物医药行业的证据[J]. 产业经济研究, 2024(5): 114-127.
[14] 赵君艳, 王舒瑜. 我国医药制造业创新能力评价及提升对策——基于模糊集定性比较分析(fs-QCA) [J]. 市场周刊, 2023, 36(9): 146-149.
[15] 鲁若愚, 张立锴, 陈雪琳, 等. 基于科学的产业发展影响因素组态与路径研究——对中国内地31省份医药制造业的QCA分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(16): 20-28.
[16] 姚山季, 舒成峰, 马琳. 我国医药制造业创新效率提升的组态路径研究——基于DEA模型与模糊集的定性比较分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2021(10): 160-163, 195.
[17] 杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA): 管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6): 155-167.
[18] Tornatzky, L.G. and Fleischer, M. (1990) The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books.
[19] 古安伟, 蒋慧慧, 鲁喜凤, 等. 数字化情境下用户参与产品创新组态效应研究——基于TOE框架的fsQCA分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(22): 72-81.
[20] Ullah, F., Qayyum, S., Thaheem, M.J., Al-Turjman, F. and Sepasgozar, S.M.E. (2021) Risk Management in Sustainable Smart Cities Governance: A TOE Framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, Article ID: 120743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Liu, L., Wang, L. and Rong, D. (2025) Coupling Mechanisms in Digital Transformation Systems: A Toe-Based Multi-Level Study of MNE Subsidiary Performance. Systems, 13, Article 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Kottemann, J.E. and Boyer-Wright, K.M. (2009) Human Resource Development, Domains of Information Technology Use, and Levels of Economic Prosperity. Information Technology for Development, 15, 32-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] McLeod, L. and Doolin, B. (2012) Information Systems Development as Situated Socio-Technical Change: A Process Approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 176-191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 陈旭升, 汪鹏飞, 张旭东. 数智赋能区域传统工业企业创新路径研究——基于TOEP理论框架[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(2): 68-78.
[25] Ahani, A., Rahim, N.Z.A. and Nilashi, M. (2017) Forecasting Social CRM Adoption in SMEs: A Combined Sem-Neural Network Method. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 560-578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Porter, M.E. and Heppelmann, J.E. (2014) How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition. Harvard Business Review, 92, 64-88.
[27] Henderson, R.M. and Clark, K.B. (1990) Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Fosso Wamba, S. and Mishra, D. (2017) Big Data Integration with Business Processes: A Literature Review. Business Process Management Journal, 23, 477-492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] 方磊, 赵静, 罗文华, 等. 产业创新生态系统的建设策略: 基于浙江生物医药产业的案例研究[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2022, 39(22): 3014-3023.
[30] Woodside, A.G. (2011) Responding to the Severe Limitations of Cross-Sectional Surveys: Commenting on Rong and Wilkinson’s Perspectives. Australasian Marketing Journal, 19, 153-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P.C. and Aguilera, R.V. (2018) Studying Configurations with Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Best Practices in Strategy and Organization Research. Strategic Organization, 16, 482-495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] 张明, 蓝海林, 陈伟宏, 等. 殊途同归不同效: 战略变革前因组态及其绩效研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9): 168-186.
[33] 张永安, 鲁明明. 高技术制造业创新效率评价及要素投入差异性研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(16): 51-57.
[34] 曾卓骐, 王跃. 战略性新兴产业上市公司动态创新效率测度及其影响因素研究——基于两阶段DSBM模型与Tobit模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(21): 65-74.
[35] 李志军. 我国城市营商环境的评价指标体系构建及其南北差异分析[J]. 改革, 2022(2): 36-47.
[36] 张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用: 定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(9): 1312-1323.
[37] 谢智敏, 王霞, 杜运周, 等. 制度复杂性、创业导向与创新型创业——一个基于跨国案例的组态分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(5): 863-873.