人才生态系统理论视角下应对人口老龄化的人才成长路径社会治理研究
Research on the Talent Growth Path and Social Governance in Response to Population Aging from the Perspective of Talent Ecological System Theory
摘要: 人口老龄化已成为我国长期面临的重大社会人口问题,养老保障、老年健康服务、养老产业发展等应对老龄化的核心领域,均面临人才总量短缺、结构失衡、能力适配性不足、成长体系不完善的现实困境。人才生态系统理论以系统性、共生性、动态演化性为核心特征,为破解应对老龄化人才成长难题提供了全新的分析框架与实践思路。本文基于人才生态系统“环境–主体–互动–演化”的核心逻辑,界定应对老龄化人才生态系统的内涵与构成要素,剖析当前我国应对老龄化人才成长在环境支撑、主体协同、人才发展、系统适配等方面的现实问题,从优化生态环境、强化主体共生、激活人才内生动力、推动系统动态演化四个维度,构建适配老龄化社会发展需求的人才成长路径,为完善应对老龄化人才队伍建设、提升老龄化社会治理能力、推动银发经济高质量发展提供理论参考与实践指引。
Abstract: Population aging has become a major social demographic issue that China faces in the long term. Core areas addressing aging, such as pension security, elderly health services, and the development of the elderly care industry, are all confronted with the practical dilemmas of talent shortage, structural imbalance, insufficient capability adaptability, and an imperfect growth system. The talent ecological system theory, characterized by systematicity, symbiosis, and dynamic evolution, provides a new analytical framework and practical ideas for solving the challenges of talent growth in response to aging. Based on the core logic of the talent ecological system, which includes “environment-subject-interaction-evolution”, this paper defines the connotation and components of the talent ecological system in response to aging, analyzes the current practical issues in China regarding talent growth in response to aging in terms of environmental support, subject collaboration, talent development, and system adaptation. From four dimensions—optimizing the ecological environment, strengthening subject symbiosis, activating endogenous motivation for talent, and promoting dynamic evolution of the system—this paper constructs a talent growth path that adapts to the development needs of an aging society, providing theoretical references and practical guidance for improving the construction of the talent team in response to aging, enhancing governance capabilities in an aging society, and promoting high-quality development of the silver economy.
文章引用:刘容, 黄涛. 人才生态系统理论视角下应对人口老龄化的人才成长路径社会治理研究 [J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(3): 423-431. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.133052

参考文献

[1] Gierasch, L.M. (2025) From Rat Tails to Glycoproteostasis: Motivated by Biology, Enabled by Biophysics, and Lucky. Journal of Molecular Biology, 437, Article 169055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Gabbard, J., Sadarangani, T.R., Datta, R., Fabius, C.D., Gettel, C.J., Douglas, N.F., et al. (2023) Career Development in Pragmatic Clinical Trials to Improve Care for People Living with Dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 71, 3554-3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 中国老龄科学研究中心. 中国养老服务人才发展报告(2024-2025) [R]. 北京: 中国老龄科学研究中心, 2025.
[4] 李建新. 中国养老服务人才供需失衡的成因与治理路径——基于人才生态系统视角[J]. 人口研究, 2023, 47(2): 58-72.
[5] 房莉杰. 医养结合人才队伍建设的政策协同与产业支撑机制[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2024, 17(2): 36-42.
[6] 赵琛徽, 张秀慧. “求知共进”还是“藏知自守”: 工作中成功老龄化对代际知识转移的影响[J]. 南开管理评论, 2025, 28(4): 112-120.
[7] 谢立黎, 胡超瑜. 跨越年龄边界: 终身学习驱动下重塑老龄社会职业生命周期[J]. 中国人口科学, 2024(3): 62-73.
[8] 王武林, 张奇. 中国老年人数字失能现状及演化机制研究[J]. 人口研究, 2025, 49(5): 70-84.
[9] 李建新. 积极老龄化视域下人才生态系统的协同治理与动态演化[J]. 人口与经济, 2023(4): 79-96.
[10] Wright, G.D., Thompson, K.A., Reis, Y., Bischof, J., Hockberger, P.E., Itano, M.S., et al. (2024) Recognising the Importance and Impact of Imaging Scientists: Global Guidelines for Establishing Career Paths within Core Facilities. Journal of Microscopy, 294, 397-410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Li, Q., Xiao, N., Zhang, H., Liang, G., Lin, Y., Qian, Z., et al. (2025) Systemic Aging and Aging-Related Diseases. The FASEB Journal, 39, e70430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Almutairi, M., Almutairi, A. and Alodhialah, A. (2025) Assessing the Impact of Community Health Coaching on Self-Management of Chronic Illness among Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Approach. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 20, 231-244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Harden, J.T., Heyn, P.C., Hill, C.V., Oh, E.S. and Perez, G.A. (2025) Increasing Representation/Inclusivity of Older Adults and Investigators from Minoritized Groups in Aging Research. The Gerontologist, 65, gnae168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Pillai, G.C., Mouksassi, S., Asiimwe, I.G., Rayner, C.R., Kern, S., Sinxadi, P., et al. (2025) Advancing Pharmacometrics in Africa—Transition from Capacity Development toward Job Creation. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, 14, 407-419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Feng, C., Weng, F. and Liu, Z.Y. (2025) Evaluation Index System for Value Co-Creation in Integrated Care within the Context of Digital Transformation. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 18118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Sheng, Y., Bond, R., Jaiswal, R., Dinsmore, J. and Doyle, J. (2024) Augmenting K-Means Clustering with Qualitative Data to Discover the Engagement Patterns of Older Adults with Multimorbidity When Using Digital Health Technologies: Proof-of-Concept Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e46287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]