金融诈骗犯罪中“非法占有目的”的认定研究
Research on the Identification of “Intent to Unlawfully Possess” in Financial Fraud Crimes
摘要: 金融诈骗犯罪作为侵害国家金融管理秩序与公私财产的双重客体犯罪,其核心主观要件“非法占有目的”在理论与实务中存在认定困境,直接影响罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪的界分。本文以“非法占有目的”为切入点,首先界定金融诈骗犯罪的概念、特征与类型,厘清其与普通诈骗罪的法益、行为、主体差异,强调特别法优于一般法的适用原则。其次,辨析“非法占有目的”的法理基础,揭示“排除意思”与“利用意思”的辩证统一,借鉴德国“处分意思”理论,论证其作为所有金融诈骗罪的必然要件。再进行剖析贷款诈骗与集资诈骗的司法难题,如“行为时”判断与资金用途实质审查的模糊,并构建主客观相统一的认定路径,规范推定规则与程序保障。研究发现,现行司法解释需细化证明标准,以平衡打击犯罪与防范冤案。全文旨在为精准适用刑法提供教义学支撑,推动金融领域刑事司法的统一与谦抑。
Abstract: As a dual object crime that infringes on the national financial management order and public and private property, the core subjective element “intent to unlawfully possess” has a dilemma in theory and practice, which directly affects the boundary between crime and non-crime, one crime and that crime. Taking the “intent to unlawfully possess” as the starting point, this article first defines the concept, characteristics and types of financial fraud crimes, clarifies the differences between their legal interests, behaviors and subjects and ordinary fraud crimes, and emphasizes the applicable principle that special law is superior to general law. Secondly, we should identify the legal basis of “intent to unlawfully possess”, reveal the dialectical unity of “intent to exclude” and “intent to utilize”, and draw on the German theory of “intent to dispose” to argue that it is an inevitable element of all financial fraud crimes. Then analyze the judicial problems of loan fraud and fund-raising fraud, such as the ambiguity of the “at the time of the act” judgment and the substantive review of the use of funds, and build an identification path based on the unity of the subjective and the objective, and standardize the presumption rules and procedural guarantees. The study found that the current judicial interpretation needs to refine the certification standards to balance the fight against crime and prevent wrongful cases. The full text aims to provide doctrinal support for the accurate application of criminal law and promote the unification and humility of criminal justice in the financial field.
文章引用:王维华. 金融诈骗犯罪中“非法占有目的”的认定研究[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(3): 66-77. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.123080

参考文献

[1] 陈洪兵. 不必严格区分法条竞合与想象竞合——大竞合论之提倡[J]. 清华法学, 2012, 6(1): 38-63.
[2] 张明楷. 法条竞合中关系的确定与处理[J]. 法学家, 2011(1): 29-46+177.
[3] 蔡道通. 特别法条优于普通法条适用——以金融诈骗罪行为类型的意义为分析视角[J]. 法学家, 2015(5): 29-42+176.
[4] 曲新久, 陈兴良, 张明楷, 等. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2022: 323.
[5] 张明楷. 论财产罪的非法占有目的[J]. 法商研究, 2005(5): 71-83.
[6] 何荣功. 非法占有目的与诈骗案件的刑民界分[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2020(3): 21-36.
[7] 陈兴良. 刑法研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2021: 552.
[8] 陈兴良. 刑罚目的新论[J]. 华东政法学院学报, 2001(3): 3-9.
[9] 王树茂. 金融诈骗犯罪“非法占有目的”的司法认定[J]. 法治论坛, 2015(2): 211-218.
[10] 刘宪权. 贷款诈骗罪若干疑难问题的刑法分析[J]. 甘肃政法学院学报, 2008(4): 1-7.
[11] 陆诗忠. 论贷款诈骗罪之非法占有目的的司法认定[J]. 信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010, 30(6): 53-55+63.
[12] 徐光华. 金融诈骗罪特别从宽于诈骗罪的再认识[J]. 中国法学, 2024(1): 85-104.
[13] 刘宪权, 吴允锋. 论金融诈骗罪的非法占有目的[J]. 法学, 2001(7): 36-41.
[14] 王俊. 非法占有目的的不同意义基于对盗窃、侵占、诈骗的比较研究[J]. 中外法学, 2017, 29(5): 1377-1398.