年轻恒牙活髓保留技术的临床新进展
New Clinical Progress in Vital Pulp Preservation Techniques for Immature Permanent Teeth
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1631031, PDF,   
作者: 唐柏森*, 贾 良*, 郭宇祺*:新疆医科大学口腔医学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐;贾 音#:中国医学科学院,北京;阜外医院医学统计部,北京
关键词: 年轻恒牙血运重建牙髓切断术盖髓材料根尖诱导成形术Immature Permanent Teeth Regenerative Endodontic Procedures Pulpotomy Pulp-Capping Materials Apexification
摘要: 年轻恒牙因牙根未完全发育,龋病、外伤等引发的牙髓暴露易导致牙根发育停滞,传统活髓保留技术存在适应症窄、材料性能局限等问题。随着“保髓优先”理念普及,活髓保留技术近年取得显著进展:术式层面,牙髓切断术适应症拓展至部分不可复性牙髓炎,根尖诱导成形术通过材料迭代降低根折风险,牙髓血运重建术凭借生物支架实现牙根三维发育,形成分级治疗体系;材料层面,iRoot BP Plus、Biodentine等硅酸钙基生物陶瓷以低变色率、高矿化诱导能力替代传统氢氧化钙与MTA,CGF + PPP等复合生物材料进一步提升疗效;诊疗技术上,全麻舒适化治疗、微创技术与口腔显微镜结合,解决低龄患儿配合难题与操作精准度问题,预后评估以初诊叩痛为核心指标优化风险预判,整体治疗成功率超90%。未来该领域将向个性化、再生化、数字化方向发展,通过多中心长期随访、基层医师规范化培训等进一步提升活髓保留效果与诊疗可及性,为年轻恒牙临床个体化治疗提供参考。
Abstract: In immature permanent teeth, incomplete root development renders pulp exposure caused by caries, trauma, and other insults prone to result in arrested root development. Traditional vital pulp therapy has been constrained by narrow indications and material-related limitations. With the widespread adoption of the “vital pulp–preserving first” concept, vital pulp therapy has achieved substantial progress in recent years. Procedurally, the indications for pulpotomy have expanded to selected cases of partial irreversible pulpitis; apexification has reduced the risk of root fracture through successive material innovations; and regenerative endodontic procedures have enabled three-dimensional root development via biological scaffolds, collectively forming a tiered treatment strategy. At the material level, calcium silicate-based bioceramics such as iRoot BP Plus and Biodentine, characterized by low discoloration potential and strong mineralization-inducing capacity, have replaced traditional calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), while composite biomaterials such as CGF combined with PPP have further improved clinical outcomes. In terms of diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, the integration of comfortable treatment under general anesthesia, minimally invasive approaches, and dental operating microscopes has addressed cooperation difficulties in young children and enhanced operative precision. Prognostic assessment has been optimized by using percussion pain at the initial visit as a key indicator for risk prediction, with reported overall success rates exceeding 90%. Future developments are expected to focus on personalized, regenerative, and digitalized approaches, supported by multicenter long-term follow-up studies and standardized training for primary care dentists, to further improve the effectiveness and accessibility of vital pulp therapy for immature permanent teeth.
文章引用:唐柏森, 贾良, 郭宇祺, 贾音. 年轻恒牙活髓保留技术的临床新进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(3): 2356-2361. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1631031

参考文献

[1] 葛立宏. 儿童口腔医学[M]. 第4版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012.
[2] 赵守亮, 彭彬. 牙体牙髓病学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2022.
[3] 袁婧, 余思静, 游梦, 等. 上颌侧切牙年轻恒牙牙中牙伴根尖周炎的牙髓血运重建治疗1例[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2022, 40(6): 716-720.
[4] Hashimoto, K. and Aizawa, M. (2025) Special Issue “Bioceramics: Challenges and Medical Applications of Calcium-Phosphate-Based Biocompatible Ceramics”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26, Article 10612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 吴翠, 李长顺, 张昕. Theracal LC与MTA用于复杂冠折年轻恒牙活髓切断术的临床对照研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2024, 44(10): 753-758+774.
[6] 于艳玲, 张婧瑜, 段海洁, 等. 不同生物活性盖髓材料用于年轻恒牙活髓切断术中的临床效果比较[J]. 武警医学, 2024, 35(10): 867-871+875.
[7] 周冰, 张帅, 屈怡静, 等. 活髓切断术后铸瓷高嵌体修复年轻恒磨牙临床研究[J]. 转化医学杂志, 2025, 14(9): 84-88.
[8] 张海龙, 陈雪, 王敬, 等. 年轻恒牙外伤性冠折露髓时间与初诊叩痛对预后的影响[J]. 中国医刊, 2024, 59(7): 768-772.
[9] 林艳, 杜燚, 何雁冰, 等. 不同牙髓状态年轻恒牙根尖诱导成形术的临床疗效分析[J]. 当代临床医刊, 2025, 37(5): 31-34.
[10] 张键, 赵林帆, 陈隽永. 牙髓血运重建术与根尖诱导成形术治疗年轻恒牙牙髓坏死的效果对比[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2025(15): 23-26.
[11] Nabeel, M., Abu-Seida, A.M., Elgendy, A.A. and Tawfik, H.M. (2024) Biocompatibility of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Biodentine as Root-End Filling Materials: An in Vivo Study. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 3568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 廖佳辰, 陈龙, 陆畅畅, 等. iRoot BP Plus根尖屏障术和Vitapex根尖诱导成形术对发生慢性根尖周炎的年轻恒牙的疗效比较[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2024, 29(12): 709-712+718.
[13] 姜新亚, 李静静, 刘兵. 牙髓血管再生术与根尖诱导成形术治疗年轻恒牙牙髓坏死的效果比较[J]. 中国实用医刊, 2024, 51(22): 49-52.
[14] Bukhary, S. (2025) Apexification of an Endodontically Failed Permanent Tooth with an Open Apex: A Case Report with Histologic Findings. Medicina, 61, Article 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 于嘉昂, 杨丽丽, 徐志媛, 等. CGF联合氢氧化钙替硝唑糊剂用于年轻恒牙血运重建的效果观察[J]. 转化医学杂志, 2025, 14(7): 101-105.
[16] 买布拜木·买买提依明, 玛衣努尔·艾赛提, 帕吾孜叶·帕尔哈提, 等. 富血小板纤维蛋白用于牙髓坏死的年轻恒牙患儿血管再生情况的随访分析[J]. 口腔医学, 2025, 45(3): 175-179+184.
[17] 张静, 刘婷婷, 刘高成. 浓缩生长因子用于年轻恒牙牙髓血运重建术的临床疗效研究[J]. 新疆医科大学学报, 2025, 48(7): 963-967.
[18] 霍娇汝, 钟月月, 拓瑞. 自体贫血小板血浆联合浓缩生长因子在年轻恒牙牙外伤治疗中的临床疗效分析[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2025, 41(4): 484-489.
[19] 潘宏, 钱晓晴, 金渊. 氢氧化钙糊剂联合牙髓血运重建术治疗年轻恒牙牙髓坏死的临床效果分析[J]. 中国美容医学, 2025, 34(8): 170-173.
[20] 胡乐, 张鑫, 祁星, 等. 两种盖髓材料在深龋穿髓直接盖髓术中的应用比较[J]. 中国美容医学, 2025, 34(11): 154-157.
[21] 于汶源, 史文毅, 万梅, 等. 四种盖髓材料治疗龋源性露髓恒牙的临床疗效比较[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版), 2025, 60(2): 220-224.
[22] 朱松. 直接盖髓材料的新进展[J]. 口腔材料器械杂志, 2025, 34(3): 133-136.