基于影像组学结合机器学习在子宫内膜增生与子宫内膜癌鉴别中的研究进展
Research Progress of Radiomics Combined with Machine Learning in the Differentiation of Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer
摘要: 子宫内膜癌(Endometrial Cancer, EC)是女性生殖系统当中常见的一种恶性肿瘤,发病率正呈现出持续不断上升的趋势,且发病年龄有年轻化倾向,这严重地威胁到了女性的生命健康。子宫内膜增生(Endometrial Hyperplasia, EH)属于子宫内膜癌的癌前病变,如何精准地区分子宫内膜增生和子宫内膜癌,并且对不同的患者开展个体化的治疗,到现在依然是当前妇科临床所面临的一个关键挑战。对于那些有生育需求或者需要进行个体化管理的患者来说,这一点至关重要。传统的诊断方法主要依赖于影像检查、诊断性刮宫以及宫腔镜检查活检,不过这些诊断手段存在一定的局限性,它们的敏感性、准确性和特异性有限。近年来,影像组学(Radiomics)和机器学习(Machine Learning, ML)技术的融合,为子宫内膜病变的无创、精准鉴别开辟了一条新的路径。影像组学能够从超声、磁共振成像(MRI)、计算机断层扫描(CT)以及正电子发射断层扫描(PET-CT)等医学图像当中,以高通量的方式提取定量特征,从而揭示出人眼无法识别的肿瘤异质性信息;而机器学习则是凭借构建预测模型,去挖掘这些特征和病理结局之间存在的复杂关联。本文系统地对影像组学结合机器学习在EH和EC鉴别诊断方面的研究进展进行了综述,内容囊括了它的基本技术流程、基于不同影像模态的应用现状,文章还分析了当前研究在标准化、可重复性以及临床转化这些方面所面临的挑战,并且对未来的发展方向进行了展望,以期能够为推动子宫内膜病变的精准、无创诊断提供理论依据和技术参考。
Abstract: Endometrial cancer (EC) is a common malignant tumor of the female reproductive system. Its incidence has been continuously rising, with a trend to younger starting age, bringing a big danger to women’s health. Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is a pre-cancer illness of endometrial cancer. To distinguish accurately between endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer, and to carry out patient-specific treatment for different persons, still is a very important difficult problem in present gynecological clinic work. This is especially vital for patients who have wish to bear children or who need person-targeted management. Traditional diagnosis methods mainly depend on image check, diagnostic scraping of uterus, and hysteroscope biopsy; however, these ways have inside limits, including not-best sensitivity, correctness, and specificity. In recent years, the combination of radiomics and machine learning (ML) has opened a new road for non-invasive and accurate distinction of endometrial lesions. Radiomics can carry out high-volume extraction of quantity features from medical images like ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), therefore revealing information about tumor heterogeneity that human eyes cannot feel. Machine learning, through building predictive models, finds out the complex connections between these features and pathological results. Therefore, this article systematically reviews the research progress of radiomics combined with machine learning in the differential diagnosis of EH and EC. It includes the basic technical work processes, the current application situation among different image methods, and analyzes the difficulties met in present research about standardization, repeatability, and clinical translation. Hence, future development directions are also discussed, with the aim to provide a theory foundation and technology reference for pushing forward the accurate, non-invasive diagnosis of endometrial lesions.
文章引用:汪吉, 牟晓玲. 基于影像组学结合机器学习在子宫内膜增生与子宫内膜癌鉴别中的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(3): 2429-2437. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1631041

参考文献

[1] Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., Soerjomataram, I., et al. (2024) Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 74, 229-263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 赵湘铃, 段朝晖, 张敏, 等. 中国子宫内膜癌疾病负担状况及流行趋势预测[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2023, 31(8): 568-573.
[3] Crosbie, E.J., Zwahlen, M., Kitchener, H.C., Egger, M. and Renehan, A.G. (2010) Body Mass Index, Hormone Replacement Therapy, and Endometrial Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 19, 3119-3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] McVicker, L., Cardwell, C.R., Edge, L., McCluggage, W.G., Quinn, D., Wylie, J., et al. (2022) Survival Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer Patients According to Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Cancer, 22, Article No. 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Habeshian, T.S., Peeri, N.C., De Vivo, I., Schouten, L.J., Shu, X., Cote, M.L., et al. (2024) Hypertension and Risk of Endometrial Cancer: A Pooled Analysis in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium (E2C2). Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 33, 788-795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Wu, Q., Li, Y., Tu, C., Zhu, J., Qian, K., Feng, T., et al. (2015) Parity and Endometrial Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Epidemiological Studies. Scientific Reports, 5, Article No. 14243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Thoprasert, P., Phaliwong, P., Smanchat, B., Prommas, S., Bhamarapravatana, K. and Suwannarurk, K. (2023) Endometrial Thickness Measurement as Predictor of Endometrial Hyperplasia and Cancer in Perimenopausal Uterine Bleeding: Cross-Sectional Study. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 24, 693-699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Kim, K.R., Lax, S., Lazar, A., Longacre, T., Malpica, A., Matias-Guiu, X., et al. (2020) Tumours of the Uterine Corpus. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, Ed., Female Genital Tumours, 5th Edition, International Agency of Research on Cancer, 245-308.
[9] Lacey, J.V. and Chia, V.M. (2009) Endometrial Hyperplasia and the Risk of Progression to Carcinoma. Maturitas, 63, 39-44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Van Den Bosch, T., Verbakel, J.Y., Valentin, L., Wynants, L., De Cock, B., Pascual, M.A., et al. (2021) Typical Ultrasound Features of Various Endometrial Pathologies Described Using International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) Terminology in Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 57, 164-172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] van Hanegem, N., Prins, M.M.C., Bongers, M.Y., Opmeer, B.C., Sahota, D.S., Mol, B.W.J., et al. (2016) The Accuracy of Endometrial Sampling in Women with Postmenopausal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 197, 147-155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Huang, E.C., Mutter, G.L., Crum, C.P. and Nucci, M.R. (2010) Clinical Outcome in Diagnostically Ambiguous Foci of “Gland Crowding” in the Endometrium. Modern Pathology, 23, 1486-1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Lambin, P., Rios-Velazquez, E., Leijenaar, R., Carvalho, S., van Stiphout, R.G.P.M., Granton, P., et al. (2012) Radiomics: Extracting More Information from Medical Images Using Advanced Feature Analysis. European Journal of Cancer, 48, 441-446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Incoronato, M., Aiello, M., Infante, T., Cavaliere, C., Grimaldi, A., Mirabelli, P., et al. (2017) Radiogenomic Analysis of Oncological Data: A Technical Survey. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18, Article No. 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Avanzo, M., Wei, L., Stancanello, J., Vallières, M., Rao, A., Morin, O., et al. (2020) Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Radiomics. Medical Physics, 47, e185-e202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Lambin, P., Leijenaar, R.T.H., Deist, T.M., Peerlings, J., de Jong, E.E.C., van Timmeren, J., et al. (2017) Radiomics: The Bridge between Medical Imaging and Personalized Medicine. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 14, 749-762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Zwanenburg, A., Vallières, M., Abdalah, M.A., Aerts, H.J.W.L., Andrearczyk, V., Apte, A., et al. (2020) The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-Based Phenotyping. Radiology, 295, 328-338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Vallières, M., Freeman, C.R., Skamene, S.R. and El Naqa, I. (2015) A Radiomics Model from Joint FDG-PET and MRI Texture Features for the Prediction of Lung Metastases in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 60, 5471-5496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Orlhac, F., Frouin, F., Nioche, C., Ayache, N. and Buvat, I. (2019) Validation of a Method to Compensate Multicenter Effects Affecting CT Radiomics. Radiology, 291, 53-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Zhao, B., Tan, Y., Tsai, W., Qi, J., Xie, C., Lu, L., et al. (2016) Reproducibility of Radiomics for Deciphering Tumor Phenotype with Imaging. Scientific Reports, 6, Article No. 23428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] van Griethuysen, J.J.M., Fedorov, A., Parmar, C., Hosny, A., Aucoin, N., Narayan, V., et al. (2017) Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype. Cancer Research, 77, e104-e107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B.E., Setio, A.A.A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., et al. (2017) A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis. Medical Image Analysis, 42, 60-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Yip, S.S.F. and Aerts, H.J.W.L. (2016) Applications and Limitations of Radiomics. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 61, R150-R166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Wang, X., Bao, N., Xin, X., Tan, J., Li, H., Zhou, S., et al. (2022) Automatic Evaluation of Endometrial Receptivity in Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound Images Based on 3D U-Net Segmentation. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 12, 4095-4108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Chicklore, S., Goh, V., Siddique, M., Roy, A., Marsden, P.K. and Cook, G.J.R. (2012) Quantifying Tumour Heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging by Texture Analysis. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 40, 133-140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Parekh, V. and Jacobs, M.A. (2016) Radiomics: A New Application from Established Techniques. Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development, 1, 207-226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Scalco, E. and Rizzo, G. (2017) Texture Analysis of Medical Images for Radiotherapy Applications. The British Journal of Radiology, 90, Article ID: 20160642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Limkin, E.J., Reuzé, S., Carré, A., Sun, R., Schernberg, A., Alexis, A., et al. (2019) The Complexity of Tumor Shape, Spiculatedness, Correlates with Tumor Radiomic Shape Features. Scientific Reports, 9, Article No. 4329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Avanzo, M., Stancanello, J. and El Naqa, I. (2017) Beyond Imaging: The Promise of Radiomics. Physica Medica, 38, 122-139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Cheng, Y., Li, B., Teng, X., Zhang, J., et al. (2023) Artificial Intelligence-Driven Radiomics Study in Cancer: The Role of Feature Engineering and Modeling. Military Medical Research, 10, Article No. 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S. and Sturdivant, R.X. (2013) Applied Logistic Regression. 3rd Edition, Wiley. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Cortes, C. and Vapnik, V. (1995) Support-Vector Networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273-297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Breiman, L. (2001) Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Friedman, J.H. (2001) Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29, 1189-1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2019) What the Radiologist Should Know about Artificial Intelligence—An ESR White Paper. Insights into Imaging, 10, Article No. 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Capasso, I., Cucinella, G., Wright, D.E., Takahashi, H., De Vitis, L.A., Gregory, A.V., et al. (2024) Artificial Intelligence Model for Enhancing the Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound in Detecting Endometrial Cancer and Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 34, 1547-1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Wang, M., Liu, W., Gu, X., Cui, F., Ding, J., Zhu, Y., et al. (2024) Few-Shot Learning to Identify Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer Based on Transvaginal Ultrasonic Images. Heliyon, 10, e36426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Bi, Q., Wang, Y., Deng, Y., Liu, Y., Pan, Y., Song, Y., et al. (2022) Different Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomics Models for Differentiating Stage IA Endometrial Cancer from Benign Endometrial Lesions: A Multicenter Study. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, Article ID: 939930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Zhang, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, T., Song, Y., Yu, X., Xie, L., et al. (2022) Multimodal MRI-Based Radiomics-Clinical Model for Preoperatively Differentiating Concurrent Endometrial Carcinoma from Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, Article ID: 887546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Wang, R., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Zhu, A., Li, X. and Wang, J. (2025) Prediction of a Radiomics-Based Nomogram for Complete Remission in Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Cancer Patients Seeking Fertility Preservation. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 187, Article ID: 109764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Zhang, T., Wu, H., Jiang, Z., Wang, Y., Ye, R., Ni, H., et al. (2025) CT Radiomics-Based Explainable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Endometrial Tumors: A Two-Center Study. BioMedical Engineering Online, 24, Article No. 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef