基层象征性政策执行行为的量表开发与检验
Development and Validation of a Scale for Symbolic Policy Implementation Behavior at the Grassroots Level
摘要: 象征性政策执行是基层治理中普遍存在且危害严重的政策执行偏差行为,但目前缺乏系统、可操作的本土化测量工具。本研究旨在开发并验证适用于中国基层的象征性政策执行量表。采用扎根理论方法,对四川省21名基层工作人员进行深度访谈,提炼出象征性政策执行的四个核心维度:资源错配、过程象征性、考核反馈失真、回应象征性。在此基础上编制包含14个题项的量表,经113份有效问卷实证检验,量表具有良好的信度与效度。本量表为测量、诊断和干预基层象征性政策执行提供了有效的理论支持与测量工具。
Abstract: Symbolic policy implementation is a prevalent and detrimental deviation in grassroots governance, yet there remains a lack of systematic and operable localized measurement tools. This study aims to develop and validate a scale for symbolic policy implementation behavior applicable to the Chinese grassroots context. Using grounded theory, in-depth interviews were conducted with 21 grassroots officials in Sichuan Province, from which four core dimensions of symbolic policy implement- tation were identified: resource misallocation, procedural symbolism, distorted assessment and feedback, and symbolic responsiveness. Based on these dimensions, a 14-item scale was developed and empirically tested with 113 valid questionnaires. The results demonstrate that the scale possesses good reliability and validity. This scale provides both theoretical support and a practical measurement tool for diagnosing and intervening in symbolic policy implementation at the grassroots level.
文章引用:卿三春. 基层象征性政策执行行为的量表开发与检验[J]. 可持续发展, 2026, 16(3): 156-168. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2026.163105

参考文献

[1] 孙发锋. 象征性政策执行: 表现、根源及治理策略[J]. 中州学刊, 2020(12): 15-20.
[2] Matland, R.E. (1995) Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5, 145-174.
[3] Lipsky, M. (2023) The Critical Role of Street Level Bureaucrats. In: Cree, V.E. and McCulloch, T., Eds., Social Work, Routledge, 194-198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 宁骚. 公共政策学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003: 244.
[5] 李海强, 刘娇. 基层产业振兴政策的执行因何受阻?——基于“模糊-冲突”模型的分析[J]. 科技和产业, 2025, 25(23): 284-289.
[6] 黄建红. 基层政府农业政策执行悖论与应对之策——基于“模糊-冲突”模型的分析[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 43(2): 116-124.
[7] 田先红, 罗兴佐. 官僚组织间关系与政策的象征性执行——以重大决策社会稳定风险评估制度为讨论中心[J]. 江苏行政学院学报, 2016(5): 70-75.
[8] Tummers, L. (2012) Policy Alienation of Public Professionals: The Construct and Its Measurement. Public Administration Review, 72, 516-525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 夏德峰, 张浩崑. 基于“模糊-冲突”模型的放权赋能政策执行分析[J]. 河南社会科学, 2025, 33(10): 25-36.
[10] O’Brien, K.J. and Li, L. (2017) Selective Policy Implementation in Rural China. In: Brodsgaard, K.E., Ed., Critical Readings on the Communist Party of China (4 Vols. Set), Brill, 437-460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 张国磊. 科层压力、变通执行与基层减负——基于中山市T镇的调研分析[J]. 地方治理研究, 2024(2): 2-14, 78.
[12] 吴肃然, 李名荟. 扎根理论的历史与逻辑[J]. 社会学研究, 2020, 35(2): 75-98, 243.