微震信号交互式分析与自动化处理的集成平台
An Integrated Platform for Interactive Analysis and Automated Processing of Microseismic Signals
DOI: 10.12677/me.2026.142029, PDF,   
作者: 续 伟, 周欣妍:江西理工大学矿业工程学院,江西 赣州;王艳梅, 辛冰宇:中铝(郑州)铝业有限公司,河南 郑州
关键词: 微震信号集成平台交互分析自动处理Microseismic Signal Integrated Platform Interactive Analysis Automated Processing
摘要: 微震监测在油气开采、矿山安全、滑坡监测及结构健康诊断中具有重要意义。但现有处理工具存在开源软件分散、交互性差,以及商业软件封闭、成本高等问题。为此,本文开发了一种集成微震信号交互分析与自动化处理的平台。该平台支持多种数据格式导入,提供滤波、去噪、时频分析等预处理功能,集成长短时窗事件识别和基于到达时间差的震源定位算法,并具备在线自动监测能力。平台兼顾交互操作与批量处理,既适合科研探索,又满足工程应用需求。以重庆旧县坪滑坡监测数据为例,结果表明该平台事件识别准确、定位误差小,可为滑坡等灾害监测预警提供有效支撑。该研究为微震信号从波形处理到震源参数获取提供了一体化解决方案。
Abstract: Microseismic monitoring is essential for oil and gas extraction, mine safety, landslide surveillance, and structural health assessment. Yet existing tools are limited by fragmented open-source software with poor interactivity and closed commercial software with high cost. To address this, we present an integrated platform that unifies interactive analysis with automated processing of microseismic signals. It supports diverse data formats, implements preprocessing (filtering, denoising, time-frequency analysis), event detection via Short-Term Average/Long-Term Average, and source location using arrival-time differences, with real-time monitoring capability. The platform balances flexibility and efficiency, serving both research and engineering needs. Application to the Jiuxianping landslide in Chongqing confirms high event-detection accuracy and low location errors, underscoring its value for hazard monitoring and early warning. This study provides an integrated solution for microseismic signal analysis, spanning from waveform processing to source parameter extraction.
文章引用:续伟, 王艳梅, 辛冰宇, 周欣妍. 微震信号交互式分析与自动化处理的集成平台[J]. 矿山工程, 2026, 14(2): 268-281. https://doi.org/10.12677/me.2026.142029

参考文献

[1] 刘传正, 陈春利. 中国地质灾害成因分析[J]. 地质论评, 2020, 66(5): 1334-1348.
[2] 单云锋, 李为乐, 周胜森, 等. 长江上游区域滑坡灾害生态风险评估[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(24): 11437-11449.
[3] 刘传正, 陈春利. 中国地质灾害防治成效与问题对策[J]. 工程地质学报, 2020, 28(2): 375-383.
[4] 谢和平, 高峰, 鞠杨. 深部岩体力学研究与探索[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(11): 2161-2178.
[5] 张永海, 谢武平, 罗忠行, 等. 四川名山白马沟危岩体稳定性评价与落石轨迹分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2022, 33(4): 37-46.
[6] 王洛锋, 王平, 刘强, 等. 矿山微震监测数据应用与研究[J]. 中国矿业, 2022, 31(S1): 257-260.
[7] 冯亮, 张振. 微震技术在崩塌落石监测预警应用的研究进展[J]. 工程地质学报, 2024, 32(2): 545-564.
[8] Petrokushyn, R., Szabó, T. and Bezrodnyi, D. (2019) Comparison of Seismic Processing Software (RadExPro, Promax). 18th International Conference on GeoinformaticsTheoretical and Applied Aspects, Kyiv, 13-16 May 2019, 1-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Sheehan, J. (2011) Seismic Refraction Shootout: Tomographic Inversion Using Geogiga Seismic Pro. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society.
[10] Krischer, L., Megies, T., Barsch, R., 等. ObsPy: 将地震学引入科学Python生态系统的桥梁[J]. 世界地震译丛, 2016, 47(4): 344-357.
[11] He, Z.M., Shardt, Y.A.W., Wang, D., Hou, B., Zhou, H. and Wang, J. (2018) An Incipient Fault Detection Approach via Detrending and Denoising. Control Engineering Practice, 74, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 卢锦芳, 楼京俊, 刘树勇, 等. 基于巴特沃斯滤波器的近场声全息滤波方法[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2023, 45(24): 160-165.
[13] Langet, N. and Silverberg, F.M.J. (2023) Automated Classification of Seismic Signals Recorded on the Åknes Rock Slope, Western Norway, Using a Convolutional Neural Network. Earth Surface Dynamics, 11, 89-115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Xin, B., Huang, Z., Huang, S. and Feng, L. (2024) Ensemble Learning Improves the Efficiency of Microseismic Signal Classification in Landslide Seismic Monitoring. Sensors, 24, Article 4892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 鲁铁定, 李祯, 贺小星. 考虑噪声影响的MEMD-XGBoost方法在GNSS高程时间序列建模和预测中的应用[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2024, 46(6): 149-158.
[16] Pan, Y., Chen, C., Li, D. and Zhao, Z. (2024) A Robot Path Tracking Method Based on Manual Guidance and Path Reinforcement Learning. Applied Intelligence, 55, Article No. 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef