深度伪造的技术逻辑、风险类型化与规制进路
Technical Logic, Risk Typology, and Paths to Regulation of Deepfakes
摘要: 从生成式对抗网络(GANs)到最新的扩散模型,深度伪造(Deepfakes)技术推动了视听资料从传统的“机械记录”向“智能生成”范式的根本性跃迁。这种技术红利在重塑数字内容生产方式的同时,也对既有的法律规制体系形成了一定冲击。它呈现出显著的自动化与低门槛特征,致使传统法律在认定侵权主体与归责原则时陷入两难。其风险不仅体现为对个人信息权益、知识产权等合法权益的侵蚀,更在宏观层面引发了公共信任危机,甚至影响了司法证据的真实性。鉴于此,单一的法律规制已显乏力,亟需构建一套整合技术防御、法律规范与社会协同的全链路治理框架,以期在释放技术潜能与维护法律价值之间寻求动态平衡。
Abstract: Propelled by the evolution from Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) to the latest diffusion models, Deepfake technology has catalyzed a fundamental paradigm shift in audiovisual materials, moving from traditional “mechanical recording” to “intelligent generation”. While this technological dividend reshapes the modes of digital content production, it also poses a structural challenge to existing legal regulatory frameworks. Characterized by high automation and low barriers to entry, it creates a dilemma for traditional legal mechanisms regarding the identification of infringing parties and the attribution of liability. The associated risks extend beyond the erosion of legitimate rights—such as personal information interests and intellectual property—to trigger a crisis of public trust at the macro level, even compromising the authenticity of judicial evidence. In light of this, reliance solely on legal regulation has proven insufficient. There is an urgent need to construct a “full-chain” governance framework that integrates technical defense, legal norms, and social coordination, aiming to seek a dynamic balance between unleashing technological potential and upholding legal values.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S. and Bengio, Y. (2014) Generative Adversarial Nets. Communications of the ACM, 63, 139-144.
|
|
[2]
|
Ho, J., Jain, A. and Abbeel, P. (2020) Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 6840-6851.
|
|
[3]
|
Liang, F., Kodaira, A., Xu, C., et al. (2025) Looking Backward: Streaming Video-to-Video Translation with Feature Banks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Singapore, 24-28 April 2025.
|
|
[4]
|
黄静, 韩松言, 田宇航. 生成式人工智能深度伪造风险的样态特征、生成逻辑与监管策略[J]. 电子政务, 2025(5): 31-41.
|
|
[5]
|
程啸. 个人信息权益与标识性人格权的关系[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2025(3): 41-57.
|
|
[6]
|
刘泽垣, 王鹏江, 宋晓斌, 等. 大语言模型的幻觉问题研究综述[J]. 软件学报, 2025, 36(3): 1152-1185.
|
|
[7]
|
陈全涛, 张仰森, 王璞, 等. 生成式人工智能安全风险与防御策略综述[J/OL]. 计算机科学, 1-23. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/50.1075.TP.20251017.1447.016, 2026-01-27.
|
|
[8]
|
龙敏, 尹茜, 张乐冰, 等. 基于多域特征融合的多分支网络用于Deepfake检测[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2026, 31(1): 120-137.
|
|
[9]
|
徐伟. 生成式人工智能服务提供者侵权归责原则之辨[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2024(3): 190-202.
|
|
[10]
|
王利明. 再论生成式人工智能的侵权风险及其应对[J]. 广东社会科学, 2026(1): 247-252.
|
|
[11]
|
王若冰. 论生成式人工智能侵权中服务提供者过错的认定——以“现有技术水平”为标准[J]. 比较法研究, 2023(5): 20-29.
|