高密度城区调蓄设施雨洪调控效能及运行参数优化研究
Study on Rainwater and Flood Regulation Efficiency and Operation Parameter Optimization of Storage Facilities in High-Density Urban Areas
摘要: 针对高密度滨海城市内涝风险防控需求,以上海市北外滩核心区(面积0.84 km2)为研究对象,基于SWMM模型构建研究区域排水系统模型,设置10a一遇、20a一遇2 h设计暴雨情景,系统研究调蓄池不同启用时刻(0~60 min,步长6 min)与排水泵站不同启动时刻(60、75、90、105 min)的组合调控效果,定量评估调蓄设施对地表径流峰值与溢流风险的削减能力。结果表明:调蓄池启用时刻对雨洪调控效果影响显著,10a一遇与20a一遇情景下,调蓄池于降雨开始后48 min启用时峰值流量削峰效果最优,削减率分别为21.60%和15.14%;于30 min与36 min启用时溢流节点数量削减率最为显著,分别为40.68%和44.78%,启用时刻晚于雨峰则调控效果迅速衰减。排水泵站启动时间需与调蓄池运行协同,90 min与105 min延迟启动可延长调蓄容积有效利用时段,避免后期流量回升;在统一调度规则下,调蓄池群存在“上游池满、下游池闲”的空间分配失衡问题,需采用精细化调度策略。本研究通过参数化模拟验证了“源头消峰–过程蓄滞–末端有序排放”模式在高密度城区的适用性,可为同类滨海高密度城市排水防涝系统优化调度提供技术支撑与决策依据。
Abstract: Aiming at waterlogging risk prevention in high-density coastal cities, this study takes the core area of North Bund in Shanghai (0.84 km2) as the research object, establishes a drainage system model based on SWMM, and sets two 2-hour design storm scenarios (10-year and 20-year return periods). It systematically studies the combined regulation effects of different storage tank activation times (0~60 min, 6 min interval) and drainage pumping station startup times (60, 75, 90, 105 min), quantitatively evaluating the reduction capacity of storage facilities on surface runoff peak and overflow risk. Results show that storage tank activation time significantly affects stormwater regulation. Under 10-year and 20-year return period storms, the optimal peak flow reduction (21.60% and 15.14%, respectively) is achieved when activated at 48 min after rainfall onset; the most significant reduction in overflow nodes (40.68% and 44.78%, respectively) occurs at 30 min and 36 min activation, with rapid effect attenuation if activated after the rainfall peak. Coordination between pumping station startup and storage tank operation is essential: delayed startup at 90 min and 105 min prolongs effective storage utilization and avoids late-stage flow rebound. A spatial imbalance (“full upstream tanks, idle downstream tanks”) exists in the storage tank group under unified scheduling, requiring refined strategies. This study verifies the applicability of the “peak reduction at source-storage in process-ordered discharge at terminal” mode in high-density urban areas, providing technical support for optimal scheduling of drainage and waterlogging control systems in similar coastal cities.
文章引用:张虎, 江思珉, 刘畅. 高密度城区调蓄设施雨洪调控效能及运行参数优化研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2026, 16(3): 368-382. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2026.163034

参考文献

[1] IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
[2] Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N.E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J., Bai, X., et al. (2008) Global Change and the Ecology of Cities. Science, 319, 756-760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] World Meteorological Organization (2026) State of the Global Climate 2025. World Meteorological Organization.
[4] 国家防灾减灾救灾委员会办公室, 应急管理部. 2025年全国自然灾害情况[EB/OL].
https://www.mem.gov.cn:10443/xw/yjglbgzdt/202601/t20260116_592135.shtml, 2026-01-16.
[5] 陈文龙, 张文, 吴辉明, 等. 深圳市罗湖区“9∙7”极端特大暴雨防御对策与启示[J]. 中国水利, 2024(6): 53-56.
[6] 刘琳燕, 张晓昕, 王强. 东京都暴雨应对策略经验借鉴与启示[J]. 北京规划建设, 2022(4): 24-28.
[7] 刘海彪, 黄显. 大型雨水调蓄池工程设计与调度[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2023, 41(7): 188-190.
[8] 王珅. 全地下雨水泵站及初雨调蓄池工程设计[J]. 中国给水排水, 2024, 40(2): 82-86.
[9] 陈丽群. 基于SWMM模型的雨水调蓄池优化设置研究[J]. 水利技术监督, 2023(2): 185-189.
[10] 李红艳, 张翀, 崔建国, 等. 基于博弈论赋权耦合灰色关联分析的调蓄池优化选址[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 51(3): 426-432.
[11] 张翀, 李红艳, 崔建国, 等. 基于AHP-GRA的城市内涝风险评估及调蓄池选址[J]. 给水排水, 2021, 57(11): 149-154.
[12] 罗佳杭, 刘家宏, 梅超, 等. 基于SWMM的机场调蓄设施在短历时暴雨过程中的响应模拟与分析[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2022, 53(9): 36-44.
[13] 潘鑫鑫, 侯精明, 陈光照, 等. 基于数值模拟与BP神经网络的城市调蓄池调度快速预报方法[J]. 水动力学研究与进展(A辑), 2023, 38(3): 409-420.
[14] 李文钰, 侯精明, 李轩, 等. 基于雨洪数值模型的城市雨水调蓄池优化运行方案研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2024, 35(5): 82-90.
[15] 沙治银, 徐双全, 龚成刚, 等. 上海市应对2413号台风“贝碧嘉”和2414号台风“普拉桑”措施及建议[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2025, 35(3): 86-88+97.
[16] 王心舒, 江思珉, 郑茂辉, 等. 城市高密度区域排水系统优化方案模拟评价[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 53(6): 49-56.