腰椎椎间融合材料的发展现状
The Current Development Status of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Materials
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1631061, PDF,   
作者: 张景淳:西安医学院研究生工作部,陕西 西安;习 亮*:空军军医大学第一附属医院骨科,陕西 西安
关键词: 腰椎椎间融合融合器自体骨异体骨骨移植替代物重组人骨形态发生蛋-2Lumbar Spine Interbody Fusion Fusion Cage Autogenous Bone Allogeneic Bone Bone Graft Substitutes Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2
摘要: 腰椎椎间融合术常用于治疗退行性腰椎疾病、腰椎滑脱、脊柱畸形,以及在某些感染或肿瘤切除后的重建脊柱。所谓“融合材料”主要包括两部分:第一为椎间支架,它帮助恢复椎间盘高度,用于恢复椎间高度并提供即时力学支撑,承担终板载荷传递;第二为椎间植骨材料与骨生物制剂(Bone Graft & Osteobiologics),它们为骨组织生长提供框架,传递信号刺激骨生长,并提供成骨细胞。在过去二十年里,腰椎融合材料沿着两条主要方向发展。对于支架,我们从单纯使用“惰性结构件”,发展到能够与骨整合、满足力学需求,甚至可以个性化设计的类型,比如PEEK、钛合金、钛涂层PEEK以及3D打印多孔钛对于骨移植,重点则从主要使用自体骨转向来源多样且具有可控生物活性的组合,如异体骨、脱矿骨基质(DBM)、陶瓷(HA, β-TCP, BCP)、生物活性玻璃、细胞骨基质以及rhBMP-2等生长因子。同时,我们对下沉、假关节形成以及与骨生物制剂相关的问题有了更多认识,材料改进和风险管理也在不断推进。这篇综述回顾了目前腰椎椎间融合材料的现状,涵盖支架、骨移植/生物制剂以及并发症管理,旨在为临床实践中选材和风险控制提供参考。
Abstract: Lumbar interbody fusion is commonly used to treat degenerative lumbar disease, lumbar spondylolisthesis, spinal deformities, and to reconstruct the spine after certain infections or tumor resection. The so-called “fusion material” mainly includes two parts: the first is the intervertebral scaffold, which helps to restore the height of the intervertebral disc, restores the height of the intervertebral disc, provides immediate mechanical support, and bears the load transfer of the endplate; The second is bone graft & osteobiologics, which provide a framework for bone tissue growth, transmit signals to stimulate bone growth, and provide osteoblasts. Over the past two decades, lumbar fusion materials have evolved along two main directions. For scaffolds, we have moved from simply using “inert structural parts” to types that can be integrated with bone, meet mechanical requirements, and even individualized design, such as PEEK, titanium alloys, titanium-coated PEEK, and 3D-printed porous titanium. For bone grafts, the emphasis has shifted from mainly using autologous bone to combinations of diverse sources and controllable biological activity. Such as allogeneic bone, demineralized bone matrix (DBM), ceramics (HA, β-TCP, BCP), bioactive glass, cellular bone matrix and growth factors such as rhBMP-2. At the same time, more has been learned about subsidence, pseudarthrosis formation, and issues associated with bone biologics, and advances have been made in material improvements and risk management. This review reviews the current status of materials for lumbar interbody fusion, covering stents, bone grafts/biologics, and complication management, aiming to provide a reference for material selection and risk control in clinical practice.
文章引用:张景淳, 习亮. 腰椎椎间融合材料的发展现状[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(3): 2606-2616. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1631061

参考文献

[1] Frost, B.A., Camarero-Espinosa, S. and Foster, E.J. (2019) Materials for the Spine: Anatomy, Problems, and Solutions. Materials, 12, Article 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Bilancia, G., Contartese, D., Delbello, F., Tedesco, G., Salamanna, F., Griffoni, C., et al. (2025) Accuracy and Reliability of Radiological Methods for Assessing Fusion Rates in Patients Undergoing Spinal Arthrodesis and Stabilization: A Systematic Review of the Past 10 Years. Frontiers in Surgery, 12, Article ID: 1692887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Fitzgerald, A., McCool, R., Carr, E., Miller, P., Reddish, K., Lohr, C.C., et al. (2025) A Systematic Review of Bone Graft Products Used in Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures for Degenerative Disc Disease. North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ), 21, Article 100579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Parisien, A., Wai, E.K., ElSayed, M.S.A. and Frei, H. (2022) Subsidence of Spinal Fusion Cages: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 16, 1103-1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Peters, M.J.M., Bastiaenen, C.H.G., Brans, B.T., Weijers, R.E. and Willems, P.C. (2019) The Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Modalities to Detect Pseudarthrosis after Spinal Fusion—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Skeletal Radiology, 48, 1499-1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Kincaid, J., Kim, R.J., Verma, A., Turlip, R.W., Liu, D.D., Chauhan, D., et al. (2025) Is TI-Coated PEEK Superior to PEEK for Lumbar and Cervical Fusion Procedures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14, Article 7696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Chen, Y., Qiu, Z., Hu, X., Wang, T., Li, G., Tang, Z., et al. (2025) Biofunctional Supramolecular Injectable Hydrogel with Spongy-Like Metal-Organic Coordination for Effective Repair of Critical-Sized Calvarial Defects. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 20, Article 100988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Mariscal, G., Vyas, P.S., Cheng, B.C., Arts, J.J., Hoelen, T.-C.A., Xu, C. and Chaput, C.D. (2025) Titanium-Coated Polyetherether-Ketone Cages Versus Uncoated Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Global Spine Journal, 15, 3479-3494.
[9] Liu, S., Zeng, T., Chen, C., He, L., Feng, A., Jhang, S., et al. (2024) 3d-printed Porous Titanium versus Polyetheretherketone Cages in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Subsidence. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, Article ID: 1389533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Orr, D., Anderson, R., Jensen, A., Peterson, T., Edwards, J. and Bowden, A.E. (2025) Expandable Interbody Cages for Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review. The Spine Journal, 25, 1773-1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Boden, S.D. (2002) Overview of the Biology of Lumbar Spine Fusion and Principles for Selecting a Bone Graft Substitute. Spine, 27, S26-S31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Feng, J., Yang, X., Wang, F., He, X. and Hu, Y. (2019) Efficacy and Safety of Bone Substitutes in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. European Spine Journal, 29, 1261-1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Cohen, J.D., Kanim, L.E., Trontis, A.J. and Bae, H.W. (2021) Allografts and Spinal Fusion. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 15, 68-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Tavares, W.M., de França, S.A., Paiva, W.S. and Teixeira, M.J. (2022) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fusion Rate Enhancements and Bone Graft Options for Spine Surgery. Scientific Reports, 12, Article No. 7546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Li, R., Wilson, W.W., Schwartz, N.G., Hernandez-Romieu, A.C., Glowicz, J., Hanlin, E., et al. (2021) Notes from the Field: Tuberculosis Outbreak Linked to a Contaminated Bone Graft Product Used in Spinal Surgery—Delaware, March–June 2021. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 70, 1261-1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Himawan, F. and Widhiyanto, L. (2025) Investigating the Effect of Combination between Demineralized Bone Matrix and Hydroxyapatite in Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Reports, Article 100787. In Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Wang, J.L., Eaton, R.G., Harrigan, M.E., Munjal, V., Sette, K.N., Wilson, S.B., et al. (2023) Demineralized Bone Matrix and Fibers in Spinal Fusion. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 17, S28-S34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Shepard, N.A., Rush, A.J., Scarborough, N.L., Carter, A.J. and Phillips, F.M. (2021) Demineralized Bone Matrix in Spine Surgery: A Review of Current Applications and Future Trends. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 15, 113-119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Eleswarapu, A., Rowan, F.A., Le, H., Wick, J.B., Roberto, R.F., Javidan, Y. and Klineberg, E.O. (2021) Efficacy, Cost, and Complications of Demineralized Bone Matrix in Instrumented Lumbar Fusion: Comparison With rhBMP-2. Global Spine Journal, 11, 1223-1229.
[20] Stempels, H.W., Lehr, A.M., Delawi, D., Hoebink, E.A., Wiljouw, I.A.A.A., Kempen, D.H.R., et al. (2024) Efficacy of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Ceramic with a Needle-Shaped Surface Topography versus Autograft in Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion. Spine, 49, 1323-1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Cottrill, E., Pennington, Z., Lankipalle, N., Ehresman, J., Valencia, C., Schilling, A., et al. (2020) The Effect of Bioactive Glasses on Spinal Fusion: A Cross-Disciplinary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Preclinical and Clinical Data. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 78, 34-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Lambrechts, M.J., Issa, T.Z., Mazmudar, A., Lee, Y., Toci, G.R., D’Antonio, N.D., et al. (2023) Cellular Bone Matrix in Spine Surgery—Are They Worth the Risk: A Systematic Review. Global Spine Journal, 14, 1070-1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Simmonds, M.C., Brown, J.V.E., Heirs, M.K., Higgins, J.P.T., Mannion, R.J., Rodgers, M.A., et al. (2013) Safety and Effectiveness of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Spinal Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Individual-Participant Data. Annals of Internal Medicine, 158, 877-889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Carragee, E.J., Hurwitz, E.L. and Weiner, B.K. (2011) A Critical Review of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Trials in Spinal Surgery: Emerging Safety Concerns and Lessons Learned. The Spine Journal, 11, 471-491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Ridge, B. (2026) NASS Coverage Recommendations. NASS Coverage Committee.
[26] Fu, R., Selph, S., McDonagh, M., Peterson, K., Tiwari, A., Chou, R., et al. (2013) Effectiveness and Harms of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Spine Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 158, 890-902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Rodgers, M.A., Brown, J.V.E., Heirs, M.K., Higgins, J.P.T., Mannion, R.J., Simmonds, M.C., et al. (2013) Reporting of Industry Funded Study Outcome Data: Comparison of Confidential and Published Data on the Safety and Effectiveness of Rhbmp-2 for Spinal Fusion. BMJ, 346, f3981-f3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Cooper, G.S. and Kou, T.D. (2013) Risk of Cancer after Lumbar Fusion Surgery with Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 (rh-BMP-2). Spine, 38, 1862-1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Cooper, G.S. and Kou, T.D. (2018) Risk of Cancer Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery with Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2): An Analysis Using a Commercially Insured Patient Population. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 12, 260-268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Malham, G.M., Louie, P.K., Brazenor, G.A., Mobbs, R.J., Walsh, W.R. and Sethi, R.K. (2022) Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Spine Surgery: Recommendations for Use and Alternative Bone Substitutes—A Narrative Review. Journal of Spine Surgery, 8, 477-490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] James, A.W., LaChaud, G., Shen, J., Asatrian, G., Nguyen, V., Zhang, X., et al. (2016) A Review of the Clinical Side Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, 22, 284-297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Owens, K., Glassman, S.D., Howard, J.M., Djurasovic, M., Witten, J.L. and Carreon, L.Y. (2010) Perioperative Complications with Rhbmp-2 in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. European Spine Journal, 20, 612-617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Sebastian, A.S., Wanderman, N.R., Currier, B.L., Pichelmann, M.A., Treder, V.M., Fogelson, J.L., et al. (2019) Prospective Evaluation of Radiculitis Following Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Use for Transforaminal Interbody Arthrodesis in Spine Surgery. Asian Spine Journal, 13, 544-555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Sethi, A., Craig, J., Bartol, S., Chen, W., Jacobson, M., Coe, C., et al. (2011) Radiographic and CT Evaluation of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2–assisted Spinal Interbody Fusion. American Journal of Roentgenology, 197, W128-W133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Abel, F., Tan, E.T., Sneag, D.B., Lebl, D.R. and Chazen, J.L. (2023) Postoperative Lumbar Fusion Bone Morphogenic Protein-Related Epidural Cyst Formation. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 44, 351-355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Rosen, MD, C.D., Kiester, MD, P.D. and Lee, PhD, T.Q. (2018) Pseudo-Pedicle Heterotopic Ossification from Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages. The American Journal of Orthopedics, 47, 1118-1125.
[37] Chen, N., Smith, Z.A., Stiner, E., Armin, S., Sheikh, H. and Khoo, L.T. (2010) Symptomatic Ectopic Bone Formation after Off-Label Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Report of 4 Cases. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 12, 40-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Carragee, E.J., Mitsunaga, K.A., Hurwitz, E.L. and Scuderi, G.J. (2011) Retrograde Ejaculation after Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using RhBMP-2: A Cohort Controlled Study. The Spine Journal, 11, 511-516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Vaccaro, A.R., Whang, P.G., Patel, T., Phillips, F.M., Anderson, D.G., Albert, T.J., et al. (2008) The Safety and Efficacy of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) as a Replacement for Iliac Crest Autograft for Posterolateral Lumbar Arthrodesis: Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up of a Pilot Study. The Spine Journal, 8, 457-465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Hasan, S., Al-Jamal, M., Miller, A., Higginbotham, D.O., Cavazos, D.R., Waheed, M., et al. (2023) Efficacy and Outcome Measurement of iFactor/ABM/p-15 in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review. Global Spine Journal, 14, 1422-1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Harrop, J.S., Steinmetz, M.P., O’Toole, J.E., Chaput, C.D., Sasso, R.C., Strenge, K.B., et al. (2025) P-15 Peptide Enhanced Bone Graft Improves Time to Fusion in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized, Controlled, Investigational Device Exemption Study. Spine, 51, 229-237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[42] Aleman, C., Ross, N., Phan, P., Dhenin, A., Vassal, M. and Lonjon, G. (2025) Unexpected Findings on CT Scan after Use of ABM/P-15 as a Bone Substitute for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, Article 104553. In Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[43] Hart, R., Komzák, M., Okál, F., Náhlík, D., Jajtner, P. and Puskeiler, M. (2014) Allograft Alone versus Allograft with Bone Marrow Concentrate for the Healing of the Instrumented Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion. The Spine Journal, 14, 1318-1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Roh, J.S., Yeung, C.A., Field, J.S. and McClellan, R. (2013) Allogeneic Morphogenetic Protein Vs. Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures: A Radiographic and Economic Analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 8, Article 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Yu, H., Zhou, Z., Yu, B., Sun, T., Tang, Q. and Jia, Y. (2022) The Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Applicated in Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Surgery, 9, Article ID: 924753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Kawabata, S., Akeda, K., Yamada, J., Takegami, N., Fujiwara, T., Fujita, N., et al. (2023) Advances in Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Spinal Diseases: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24, Article 7677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]