最小意识状态患者与健康对照EEG微状态差异研究
EEG Microstate Differences between Patients with Minimally Conscious State and Healthy Controls
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1631083, PDF,   
作者: 王思凡, 陈 晨, 胡雅娟*:安徽医科大学第一附属医院神经内科,安徽 合肥
关键词: 最小意识状态脑电图微状态静息状态健康对照Minimally Conscious State EEG Microstates Resting State Healthy Controls
摘要: 目的:探索最小意识状态(Minimally Conscious State, MCS)患者与健康对照(Health control, HC)组脑电图(electroencephalography, EEG)微状态的差异。方法:本研究共纳入23例HCs以及28例MCS患者,采集静息态脑电图并计算脑电图微状态。使用重复测量方差分析对微状态核心参数进行统计分析。结果:MCS患者的微状态持续时间大于HC组,发生频率小于HC组。MCS患者的微状态A的覆盖率显著高于HC组(p = 0.007),而微状态D则显著低于HC组(p = 0.042)。结论:MCS患者静息态脑电微状态存在显著异常,表现为持续时间延长、发生频率降低,以及低级感觉网络代偿增强、高级认知网络活性减弱,整体活动趋于僵化。这些变化揭示大脑功能网络失衡,为意识障碍的电生理机制提供了证据。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate differences in resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) microstates between patients with minimally conscious state (MCS) and healthy controls (HC). Methods: This study included 23 healthy controls and 28 MCS patients. Resting-state EEG data were acquired and subjected to microstate analysis. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to statistically compare core microstate parameters. Results: Compared with the HC group, MCS patients exhibited significantly longer microstate duration and lower occurrence. Coverage of microstate A was significantly higher in the MCS group than in the HC group (p = 0.007), whereas coverage of microstate D was significantly lower (p = 0.042). Conclusion: Resting-state EEG microstates in MCS patients show significant abnormalities, characterized by prolonged duration, reduced occurrence, compensatory hyperactivity in low-level sensory networks, and reduced activity in high-level cognitive networks, with overall neural dynamics becoming more rigid. These alterations reveal functional network imbalances in the brain and provide electrophysiological evidence for the mechanisms underlying disorders of consciousness.
文章引用:王思凡, 陈晨, 胡雅娟. 最小意识状态患者与健康对照EEG微状态差异研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(3): 2813-2819. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1631083

参考文献

[1] Edlow, B.L., Claassen, J., Schiff, N.D. and Greer, D.M. (2020) Recovery from Disorders of Consciousness: Mechanisms, Prognosis and Emerging Therapies. Nature Reviews Neurology, 17, 135-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Gonzalez-Lara, L.E., Munce, S., Christian, J., Owen, A.M., Weijer, C. and Webster, F. (2021) The Multiplicity of Caregiving Burden: A Qualitative Analysis of Families with Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Injury, 35, 200-208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Kondziella, D., Bender, A., Diserens, K., van Erp, W., Estraneo, A., Formisano, R., et al. (2020) European Academy of Neurology Guideline on the Diagnosis of Coma and Other Disorders of Consciousness. European Journal of Neurology, 27, 741-756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Giacino, J.T., Kalmar, K. and Whyte, J. (2004) The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: Measurement Characteristics and Diagnostic Utility. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 2020-2029.
[5] Sarkamo, T., Tervaniemi, M., Laitinen, S., Forsblom, A., Soinila, S., Mikkonen, M., et al. (2008) Music Listening Enhances Cognitive Recovery and Mood after Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke. Brain, 131, 866-876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Michel, C.M. and Koenig, T. (2018) EEG Microstates as a Tool for Studying the Temporal Dynamics of Whole-Brain Neuronal Networks: A Review. NeuroImage, 180, 577-593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Britz, J., Van De Ville, D. and Michel, C.M. (2010) BOLD Correlates of EEG Topography Reveal Rapid Resting-State Network Dynamics. NeuroImage, 52, 1162-1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Ling, Y., Wen, X., Tang, J., Tao, Z., Sun, L., Xin, H., et al. (2023) Effect of Topographic Comparison of Electroencephalographic Microstates on the Diagnosis and Prognosis Prediction of Patients with Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 30, e14421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Zhang, C., Yang, Y., Han, S., Xu, L., Chen, X., Geng, X., et al. (2022) The Temporal Dynamics of Large‐Scale Brain Network Changes in Disorders of Consciousness: A Microstate‐Based Study. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 29, 296-305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Manasova, D., Perl, Y.S., Bruno, N.M., Valente, M., Rohaut, B., Tagliazucchi, E., et al. (2025) Dynamics of EEG Microstates Change across the Spectrum of Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Topography, 38, Article No. 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Skibsted, A.P., Amiri, M., Fisher, P.M., Sidaros, A., Hribljan, M.C., Larsen, V.A., et al. (2018) Consciousness in Neurocritical Care Cohort Study Using fMRI and EEG (CONNECT-ME): Protocol for a Longitudinal Prospective Study and a Tertiary Clinical Care Service. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, Article ID: 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Artoni, F., Maillard, J., Britz, J., Seeber, M., Lysakowski, C., Bréchet, L., et al. (2022) EEG Microstate Dynamics Indicate a U-Shaped Path to Propofol-Induced Loss of Consciousness. NeuroImage, 256, Article 119156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Tarailis, P., Koenig, T., Michel, C.M. and Griškova-Bulanova, I. (2023) The Functional Aspects of Resting EEG Microstates: A Systematic Review. Brain Topography, 37, 181-217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Korn, U., Krylova, M., Heck, K.L., Häußinger, F.B., Stark, R.S., Alizadeh, S., et al. (2021) EEG-Microstates Reflect Auditory Distraction after Attentive Audiovisual Perception Recruitment of Cognitive Control Networks. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 15, Article ID: 751226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Norouzi, H. and Daliri, M.R. (2025) Microstate Dynamics in Working Memory: Exploring Spatial Information Coding of Stimulus and Behavioral Performance. Brain and Behavior, 15, e70765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Min, T., Sun, F., Tong, J., Chen, Z., Yang, Y. and Han, S. (2025) EEG Microstates during Multisensory Stimulation: Assessing the Severity of Disorders of Consciousness and Distinguishing the Minimally Conscious State. Brain Sciences, 15, Article 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Abreu, R., Jorge, J., Leal, A., Koenig, T. and Figueiredo, P. (2020) EEG Microstates Predict Concurrent fMRI Dynamic Functional Connectivity States. Brain Topography, 34, 41-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Duc, N.T. and Lee, B. (2019) Microstate Functional Connectivity in EEG Cognitive Tasks Revealed by a Multivariate Gaussian Hidden Markov Model with Phase Locking Value. Journal of Neural Engineering, 16, Article 026033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Zhang, H., Peng, B., Liu, Y., Xi, Y. and Lei, Y. (2025) Altered Microstate C and D Dynamics in High Social Anxiety: A Resting-State EEG Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article ID: 1581517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]