HR+/HER2−乳腺癌高复发风险与 DNA修复异常有关——基于METABRIC数据库分析
High Recurrence Risk in HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer Is Associated with DNA Repair Defects—An Analysis Based on the METABRIC Database
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1631100, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 黄 永, 魏一睿, 李朝阳, 李一凤, 程 巧*:重庆医科大学附属第一医院,乳腺甲状腺外科,重庆
关键词: 乳腺癌HR+/HER2−遗传特征DNA修复精准肿瘤学Breast Cancer HR+/HER2− Genetic Characteristics DNA Repair Precision Oncology
摘要: 目的:乳腺癌是全球最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,其中激素受体阳性(HR+)/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2−)亚型通常预后较好。然而,约5%~10%的HR+/HER2−患者在2.5年内发生转移,这凸显了优化风险分层和实施靶向干预的迫切性。本研究旨在鉴定该高危亚群的遗传特征并探索潜在的治疗靶点。方法:利用METABRIC数据库数据,根据临床预后将患者分为“高危”和“低危”两组。通过多组学差异分析,系统表征高危患者的分子图谱。利用TCGA乳腺癌队列对研究结果的稳健性进行外部验证。结果:多组学分析揭示了高危HR+/HER2−乳腺癌患者独特的分子特征。通路富集分析显示关键生物学过程显著受损,特别是DNA双链断裂修复机制。外部验证显示,较高的同源重组缺陷(HRD)评分与较差的无进展生存期相关。结论:这些发现加深了对高危HR+/HER2−乳腺癌遗传和分子驱动因素的理解,并为开发靶向治疗策略提供了关键见解,有助于推动精准肿瘤学的发展。
Abstract: Objective: Breast cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, with the hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) subtype generally associated with favorable outcomes. However, approximately 5%~10% of HR+/HER2− patients develop metastases within 2.5 years, highlighting the need for improved risk stratification and targeted interventions. This study aims to identify the genetic characteristics of this high-risk subgroup and explore potential therapeutic targets. Methods: Using data from the METABRIC database, patients were classified into distinct “high-risk” and “low-risk” categories based on clinical outcomes. Multi-omics differential analysis was performed to systematically characterize the molecular landscape of high-risk patients. The robustness of the findings was externally validated using the TCGA breast cancer cohort. Results: Multi-omics analysis revealed distinct molecular features in high-risk HR+/HER2− breast cancer patients. Pathway enrichment analysis demonstrated significant impairments in key biological processes, particularly in DNA double-strand break repair mechanisms. In external validation, higher homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores were associated with poorer progression-free survival. Conclusion: These findings enhance the understanding of the genetic and molecular drivers of high-risk HR+/HER2− breast cancer and provide critical insights for developing targeted therapeutic strategies, contributing to advances in precision oncology.
文章引用:黄永, 魏一睿, 李朝阳, 李一凤, 程巧. HR+/HER2−乳腺癌高复发风险与 DNA修复异常有关——基于METABRIC数据库分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(3): 2964-2978. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1631100

参考文献

[1] Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., et al. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Goldhirsch, A., Winer, E.P., Coates, A.S., Gelber, R.D., Piccart-Gebhart, M., Thürlimann, B., et al. (2013) Personalizing the Treatment of Women with Early Breast Cancer: Highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Annals of Oncology, 24, 2206-2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Huppert, L.A., Gumusay, O., Idossa, D. and Rugo, H.S. (2023) Systemic Therapy for Hormone Receptor‐positive/human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2‐negative Early Stage and Metastatic Breast Cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 73, 480-515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Prat, A., Pineda, E., Adamo, B., Galván, P., Fernández, A., Gaba, L., et al. (2015) Clinical Implications of the Intrinsic Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer. The Breast, 24, S26-S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Pagani, O., Walley, B.A., Fleming, G.F., Colleoni, M., Láng, I., Gomez, H.L., et al. (2023) Adjuvant Exemestane with Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up of the Combined TEXT and SOFT Trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 41, 1376-1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Zhu, X., Zhang, H., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., Fu, T., Jin, M., et al. (2025) Subtyping-Directed Precision Treatment Refines Traditional One-Size-Fits-All Therapy for HR+/HER2-Breast Cancer. Cancer Research, 85, 3983-3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Ma, C.X., Reinert, T., Chmielewska, I. and Ellis, M.J. (2015) Mechanisms of Aromatase Inhibitor Resistance. Nature Reviews Cancer, 15, 261-275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Dowsett, M., Cuzick, J., Ingle, J., Coates, A., Forbes, J., Bliss, J., et al. (2010) Meta-Analysis of Breast Cancer Outcomes in Adjuvant Trials of Aromatase Inhibitors versus Tamoxifen. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28, 509-518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2011) Relevance of Breast Cancer Hormone Receptors and Other Factors to the Efficacy of Adjuvant Tamoxifen: Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials. The Lancet, 378, 771-784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Francis, P.A., Pagani, O., Fleming, G.F., Walley, B.A., Colleoni, M., Láng, I., et al. (2018) Tailoring Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 379, 122-137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Filipits, M., Nielsen, T.O., Rudas, M., Greil, R., Stöger, H., Jakesz, R., et al. (2014) The PAM50 Risk-of-Recurrence Score Predicts Risk for Late Distant Recurrence after Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Endocrine-Responsive Early Breast Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 20, 1298-1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] (2012) Comprehensive Molecular Portraits of Human Breast Tumours. Nature, 490, 61-70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Puppe, J., Seifert, T., Eichler, C., Pilch, H., Mallmann, P. and Malter, W. (2020) Genomic Signatures in Luminal Breast Cancer. Breast Care, 15, 355-365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Zhang, S., Fitzsimmons, K.C. and Hurvitz, S.A. (2022) Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in Premenopausal Women. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, 14, 17588359221081077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Sparano, J.A., Gray, R.J., Makower, D.F., Albain, K.S., Saphner, T.J., Badve, S.S., et al. (2020) Clinical Outcomes in Early Breast Cancer with a High 21-Gene Recurrence Score of 26 to 100 Assigned to Adjuvant Chemotherapy plus Endocrine Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of the TAILORx Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncology, 6, 367-374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Cardoso, F., van’t Veer, L.J., Bogaerts, J., Slaets, L., Viale, G., Delaloge, S., et al. (2016) 70-gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 375, 717-729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] van‘t Veer, L.J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M.J., He, Y.D., Hart, A.A.M., Mao, M., et al. (2002) Gene Expression Profiling Predicts Clinical Outcome of Breast Cancer. Nature, 415, 530-536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Piccart, M., van ‘t Veer, L.J., Poncet, C., Lopes Cardozo, J.M.N., Delaloge, S., Pierga, J., et al. (2021) 70-Gene Signature as an Aid for Treatment Decisions in Early Breast Cancer: Updated Results of the Phase 3 Randomised MINDACT Trial with an Exploratory Analysis by Age. The Lancet Oncology, 22, 476-488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Jin, X., Zhou, Y., Ma, D., Zhao, S., Lin, C., Xiao, Y., et al. (2023) Molecular Classification of Hormone Receptor-Positive Her2-Negative Breast Cancer. Nature Genetics, 55, 1696-1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Garutti, M., Griguolo, G., Botticelli, A., Buzzatti, G., De Angelis, C., Gerratana, L., et al. (2022) Definition of High-Risk Early Hormone-Positive Her2-Negative Breast Cancer: A Consensus Review. Cancers, 14, Article No. 1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Knijnenburg, T.A., et al. (2018) Genomic and Molecular Landscape of DNA Damage Repair Deficiency across the Cancer Genome Atlas. Cell Reports, 23, 239-254.e6.
[22] Ballot, E., Galland, L., Mananet, H., Boidot, R., Arnould, L., Desmoulins, I., et al. (2022) Molecular Intrinsic Subtypes, Genomic, and Immune Landscapes of BRCA-Proficient but HRD-High ER-Positive/HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancers. Breast Cancer Research, 24, Article No. 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Pan, H., Gray, R., Braybrooke, J., Davies, C., Taylor, C., McGale, P., et al. (2017) 20-Year Risks of Breast-Cancer Recurrence after Stopping Endocrine Therapy at 5 Years. New England Journal of Medicine, 377, 1836-1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Johnston, S.R.D., Toi, M., O’Shaughnessy, J., Rastogi, P., Campone, M., Neven, P., et al. (2023) Abemaciclib plus Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Her2-Negative, Node-Positive, High-Risk Early Breast Cancer (monarchE): Results from a Preplanned Interim Analysis of a Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial. The Lancet Oncology, 24, 77-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Olivier, M., Hollstein, M. and Hainaut, P. (2009) TP53 Mutations in Human Cancers: Origins, Consequences, and Clinical Use. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 2, a001008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Kim, J., Jeong, K., Jun, H., Kim, K., Bae, J.M., Song, M.G., et al. (2023) Mutations of TP53 and Genes Related to Homologous Recombination Repair in Breast Cancer with Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations. Human Genomics, 17, Article No. 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Avena, P., Casaburi, I., Zavaglia, L., Nocito, M.C., La Padula, D., Rago, V., et al. (2022) 27-Hydroxycholesterol Binds GPER and Induces Progression of Estrogen Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancers, 14, Article No. 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Shi, S.Z., et al. (2019) Recruitment of Monocytes and Epigenetic Silencing of Intratumoral CYP7B1 Primarily Contribute to the Accumulation of 27-Hydroxycholesterol in Breast Cancer. American Journal of Cancer Research, 9, 2194-2208.
[29] Lu, Z.N., Song, J., Sun, T. and Sun, G. (2021) UBE2C Affects Breast Cancer Proliferation through the AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway. Chinese Medical Journal, 134, 2465-2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Zheng, S., et al. (2019) Overexpression of CBX2 in Breast Cancer Promotes Tumor Progression through the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway. American Journal of Translational Research, 11, 1668-1682.
[31] Urbaniak, A., Jablonska, K., Suchanski, J., Partynska, A., Szymczak-Kulus, K., Matkowski, R., et al. (2023) Prolactin-Induced Protein (PIP) Increases the Sensitivity of Breast Cancer Cells to Drug-Induced Apoptosis. Scientific Reports, 13, Article No. 6574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Willis, R. (2016) Targeted Cancer Therapy: Vital Oncogenes and a New Molecular Genetic Paradigm for Cancer Initiation Progression and Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17, Article No. 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Heeke, A.L., Xiu, J., Elliott, A., Korn, W.M., Lynce, F., Pohlmann, P.R., et al. (2020) Actionable Co-Alterations in Breast Tumors with Pathogenic Mutations in the Homologous Recombination DNA Damage Repair Pathway. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 184, 265-275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Patterson-Fortin, J. and D’Andrea, A.D. (2020) Exploiting the Microhomology-Mediated End-Joining Pathway in Cancer Therapy. Cancer Research, 80, 4593-4600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]