家校医联合干预改善肥胖儿童健康状态的 自身前后对照研究
A Self-Controlled Before-After Study on the Improvement of Health Status in Obese Children through Home-School-Medicine Joint Intervention
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1631109, PDF,   
作者: 邓 双, 朱高慧*:重庆医科大学附属儿童医院内分泌科,儿童少年健康与疾病国家临床医学研究中心,儿童发育疾病研究教育部重点实验室,儿童代谢与炎症性疾病重庆市重点实验室,重庆
关键词: 体重管理儿童肥胖家庭干预学校干预智能平台Weight Management Childhood Obesity Family-Based Intervention School-Based Intervention Digital Platform
摘要: 肥胖已成为威胁儿童健康与社会发展的重大公共卫生问题,亟需系统性体重管理应对。本研究采用了自身前后对照设计,招募了来自重庆市涪陵区的14名肥胖小学生和16名肥胖初中生,旨在评估“家–校–医”融合闭环管理方案对肥胖儿童的减重效果。所有参与者接受了为期12个月的联合干预,参与了可行性和肥胖指标的测试和调查。数据采用单向方差分析和重复测量进行统计分析。共有29名肥胖儿童完成了研究。整个试验的保留率为96.7% (1名肥胖儿童因转学而退出),健康教育课程参与率88.8% (8/9门),体育课程参与率90.8% (109/120门),且无不良事件报告。干预结束后初中组BMI (MD = −1.33, P = 0.011, Cohen’s d = −0.72)、体脂率(MD = −5.12, P = 0.001, Cohen’s d = −1.00)、腰围(MD = −2.34, P = 0.032, Cohen’s d = −0.58)均显著降低,TG (MD = −0.20, P = 0.010, Cohen’s d = −0.58)、HDL-C (MD = −0.42, P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = −0.58)显著改善。小学组干预后BMI (MD = 1.31, P = 0.011, Cohen’s d = 0.83)、体脂率(MD = 3.54, P = 0.016, Cohen’s d = 0.78)、腰围(MD = 5.54, P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.57)反而升高。家校医联合干预可显著降低13~14岁初中生的BMI、体脂率及腰围,并改善脂质代谢(TG、HDL-C),但对7~11岁小学生无积极作用。
Abstract: Childhood obesity constitutes a critical public health challenge, compromising both pediatric health and societal development, and thus necessitates systematic weight management. A self-controlled before-and-after study was conducted. A total of 14 obese primary school students and 16 obese junior high school students were recruited from Fuling District, Chongqing, to evaluate the weight loss effect of a “Home-School-Medicine” integrated closed-loop management program for obese children. All participants received a 12-month joint intervention and participated in feasibility assessments as well as tests and surveys on obesity-related indicators. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and repeated measures. A total of 29 participants completed the study, yielding a retention rate of 96.7% (one dropout due to school transfer). Participation rates were 88.8% (8/9 sessions) for health education and 90.8% (109/120 sessions) for physical activity. No adverse events were reported. After the intervention, the junior high school group exhibited significant decreases in anthropometric measures—BMI (MD = −1.33, P = 0.011, Cohen’s d = −0.72), body fat percentage (MD = −5.12, P = 0.001, Cohen’s d = −1.00), and waist circumference (MD = −2.34, P = 0.032, Cohen’s d = −0.58)—along with favorable changes in TG (MD = −0.20, P = 0.010, Cohen’s d = −0.58) and HDL-C (MD = −0.42, P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = −0.58). In the primary school group, BMI (MD = 1.31, P = 0.011, Cohen’s d = 0.83), body fat percentage (MD = 3.54, P = 0.016, Cohen’s d = 0.78), and waist circumference (MD = 5.54, P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.57) paradoxically increased after the intervention. Overall, the family-school-hospital joint intervention significantly reduced BMI, body fat percentage, and waist circumference, and improved lipid profiles (TG and HDL-C) in adolescents aged 13~14 years, whereas it showed no positive effects in children aged 7~11 years.
文章引用:邓双, 朱高慧. 家校医联合干预改善肥胖儿童健康状态的 自身前后对照研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(3): 3042-3048. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1631109

参考文献

[1] 国家卫生健康委员会. 儿童肥胖防治核心信息[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2021, 42(8): 1121-1124.
[2] GBD 2021 Adolescent BMI Collaborators (2025) Global, Regional, and National Prevalence of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity, 1990-2021, with Forecasts to 2050: A Forecasting study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet, 405, 785-812.
[3] Ciężki, S., Odyjewska, E., Bossowski, A. and Głowińska-Olszewska, B. (2024) Not Only Metabolic Complications of Childhood Obesity. Nutrients, 16, Article 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Simmonds, M., Llewellyn, A., Owen, C.G. and Woolacott, N. (2015) Predicting Adult Obesity from Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Obesity Reviews, 17, 95-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Ling, J., Chen, S., Zahry, N.R. and Kao, T.A. (2022) Economic Burden of Childhood Overweight and Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Obesity Reviews, 24, e13535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Thomas-Eapen, N. (2021) Childhood Obesity. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, 48, 505-515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Wang, S., Sun, Q., Zhai, L., Bai, Y., Wei, W. and Jia, L. (2019) The Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms among Overweight/obese and Non-Overweight/Non-Obese Children/adolescents in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, Article 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Morales Camacho, W.J., Molina Díaz, J.M., Plata Ortiz, S., Plata Ortiz, J.E., Morales Camacho, M.A. and Calderón, B.P. (2019) Childhood Obesity: Aetiology, Comorbidities, and Treatment. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 35, e3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Spiga, F., Davies, A.L., Tomlinson, E., Moore, T.H., Dawson, S., Breheny, K., et al. (2024) Interventions to Prevent Obesity in Children Aged 5 to 11 Years Old. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 5, CD015328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Li, B., Pallan, M., Liu, W.J., Hemming, K., Frew, E., Lin, R., et al. (2019) The CHIRPY DRAGON Intervention in Preventing Obesity in Chinese Primary-School—Aged Children: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial. PLOS Medicine, 16, e1002971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Adab, P., Pallan, M.J., Lancashire, E.R., Hemming, K., Frew, E., Barrett, T., et al. (2018) Effectiveness of a Childhood Obesity Prevention Programme Delivered through Schools, Targeting 6 and 7 Year Olds: Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (WAVES Study). BMJ, 360, k211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Lloyd, J., Creanor, S., Logan, S., Green, C., Dean, S.G., Hillsdon, M., et al. (2018) Effectiveness of the Healthy Lifestyles Programme (help) to Prevent Obesity in UK Primary-School Children: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2, 35-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Kipping, R.R., Howe, L.D., Jago, R., Campbell, R., Wells, S., Chittleborough, C.R., et al. (2014) Effect of Intervention Aimed at Increasing Physical Activity, Reducing Sedentary Behaviour, and Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Children: Active for Life Year 5 (AFLY5) School Based Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. BMJ, 348, g3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Epstein, L.H., Wilfley, D.E., Kilanowski, C., Quattrin, T., Cook, S.R., Eneli, I.U., et al. (2023) Family-Based Behavioral Treatment for Childhood Obesity Implemented in Pediatric Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 329, 1947-1956.
[15] 李辉, 张悦, 米杰, 等. 学校为基础的儿童肥胖干预整群随机对照试验[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2022, 43(5): 689-694.
[16] 王颖, 刘爱玲, 马冠生. 中国家庭参与儿童肥胖干预的现状及影响因素[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2023, 31(2): 101-105.
[17] 中华医学会儿科学分会内分泌遗传代谢学组. 中国儿童肥胖防治共识(2021) [J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2021, 59(9): 729-734.
[18] 中华预防医学会儿童保健分会. 儿童青少年健康管理指南(2022版) [J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2022, 30(5): 481-485.
[19] 美国运动医学学会. 儿童青少年运动处方指南[J]. 运动医学杂志, 2021, 41(3): 211-220.
[20] 国家卫生健康委员会. WS/T554-2017学生餐营养指南[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[21] 中华医学会心血管病学分会. 儿童青少年血脂异常筛查与管理专家共识[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2020, 48(12): 987-992.
[22] 方积乾. 临床试验设计与分析[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2021: 189-192.
[23] Argyropoulou, M., Anastasiou, C.A., Papamichael, M., Cardon, G., Liatis, S., Lindstrom, J., et al. (2025) A School‐based Intervention for Obesity Prevention and Management: Effectiveness and Determinants of Its Success. The Feel4Diabetes Study. Pediatric Obesity, 20, e70025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] 张倩, 胡小琪, 崔朝辉, 等. 中国城市儿童家长对儿童体重认知现状[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2022, 43(4): 521-524.
[25] Rietmeijer‐Mentink, M., Paulis, W.D., van Middelkoop, M., Bindels, P.J.E. and van der Wouden, J.C. (2012) Difference between Parental Perception and Actual Weight Status of Children: A Systematic Review. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 9, 3-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]