创伤性脑损伤患者早期凝血功能紊乱的发生危险因素分析及临床意义
Analysis of Risk Factors for Early Coagulopathy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Its Clinical Significance
摘要: 目的:探讨创伤性脑损伤(Traumatic Brain Injury, TBI)患者早期凝血功能紊乱的发生危险因素,为临床早期识别、干预及改善预后提供参考依据。方法:回顾性收集2022年1月至2024年1月于新疆医科大学第六附属医院急诊创伤中心住院治疗的156例TBI患者的临床资料,根据患者伤后24 h内凝血功能检查结果分为凝血功能紊乱组(病例组)和凝血功能正常组(对照组)。收集患者的基线资料、损伤相关指标、临床干预措施等潜在危险因素,采用单因素分析筛选差异有统计学意义的变量,再通过多因素Logistic回归分析确定TBI患者早期凝血功能紊乱的独立危险因素。结果:156例TBI患者中,早期凝血功能紊乱的发生率为48.08% (75/156)。单因素分析显示,年龄 ≥ 60岁、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分 ≤ 8分、硬膜下血肿、脑内血肿、蛛网膜下腔出血、损伤严重程度评分(ISS) ≥ 25分、低血压、低氧血症、大量输血(≥4U)、手术治疗、合并其他部位损伤等因素与TBI患者早期凝血功能紊的发生相关(P < 0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,GCS评分 ≤ 8分(OR = 3.852, 95% CI: 1.863~7.965, P < 0.001)、ISS评分 ≥ 25分(OR = 3.215, 95% CI: 1.587~6.513, P = 0.001)、低血压(OR = 2.987, 95% CI: 1.423~6.265, P = 0.004)、大量输血(≥4U) (OR = 2.764, 95% CI: 1.312~5.827, P = 0.008)及合并蛛网膜下腔出血(OR = 2.543, 95% CI: 1.231~5.256, P = 0.012)是TBI患者早期凝血功能紊乱的独立危险因素。结论:TBI患者早期凝血功能紊乱发生率较高,GCS评分 ≤ 8分、ISS评分 ≥ 25分、低血压、大量输血及合并蛛网膜下腔出血是其独立危险因素,临床需针对这些高危因素加强监测与干预,以降低凝血功能紊乱的发生风险。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the risk factors for early coagulopathy in patients with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and to provide a reference for early clinical identification, intervention, and prognosis improvement. Methods: Clinical data of 156 TBI patients hospitalized in the Emergency Trauma Center of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2022 to January 2024 were retrospectively collected. Based on coagulation test results within 24 hours post-injury, patients were divided into a coagulopathy group (case group) and a normal coagulation function group (control group). Baseline data, injury-related indicators, clinical interventions, and other potential risk factors were collected. Univariate analysis was used to screen variables with statistically significant differences, followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for early coagulopathy in TBI patients. Results: Among the 156 TBI patients, the incidence of early coagulopathy was 48.08% (75/156). Univariate analysis showed that age ≥60 years, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤ 8, subdural hematoma, intracerebral hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥25, hypotension, hypoxemia, massive transfusion (≥4 units), surgical treatment, and combined injuries in other body regions were associated with the occurrence of early coagulopathy in TBI patients (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified GCS score ≤8 (OR = 3.852, 95% CI: 1.863~7.965, P < 0.001), ISS score ≥25 (OR = 3.215, 95% CI: 1.587~6.513, P = 0.001), hypotension (OR = 2.987, 95% CI: 1.423~6.265, P = 0.004), massive transfusion (≥4 units) (OR = 2.764, 95% CI: 1.312~5.827, P = 0.008), and combined subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR = 2.543, 95% CI: 1.231~5.256, P = 0.012) as independent risk factors for early coagulopathy in TBI patients. Conclusion: The incidence of early coagulopathy is high in TBI patients. Independent risk factors include GCS score ≤8, ISS score ≥25, hypotension, massive transfusion, and combined subarachnoid hemorrhage. Clinical practice should enhance monitoring and intervention targeting these high-risk factors to reduce the risk of coagulopathy.
文章引用:侯静, 郑省慧, 叶芳. 创伤性脑损伤患者早期凝血功能紊乱的发生危险因素分析及临床意义[J]. 护理学, 2026, 15(3): 172-178. https://doi.org/10.12677/ns.2026.153082

参考文献

[1] 胡悦, 宋灏哲, 陈佳树, 等. 老年急性单纯性创伤性脑损伤患者凝血指标与进展性出血性损伤的相关性[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2020, 41(2): 302-306.
[2] 侯志琦, 马玉林, 章越凡. 中性粒细胞在创伤性脑损伤中的研究进展[J]. 中南药学, 2025, 23(1): 9-13.
[3] Zhang, S., Zhi, D. and Jiang, J. (2022) Risk Factors for Early Coagulopathy after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Journal of Neurotrauma, 39, 2156-2164.
[4] 贺一雄, 沈印. 创伤性脑损伤继发凝血病的相关研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2025, 15(3): 1323-1329.
[5] 聂梦沙, 冯波, 鲁月, 等. 体温控制疗法对重型创伤性脑损伤患者有效性及安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2025, 41(10): 975-986.
[6] 赵子龙, 周源, 张舒, 等. 细胞外线粒体介导血小板微囊泡化引起创伤性脑损伤后凝血功能紊乱[C]//中华医学会神经外科学分会第17次学术会议论文集. 2018: 887-887.
[7] Brohi, K., Ganter, M.T. and Cohen, M.J. (2022) Acute Coagulopathy of Trauma: Update on Pathophysiology and Management. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 28, 456-463.
[8] 李松, 顾迎东. 颅脑外伤患者急性创伤性凝血病研究进展[J]. 健康必读, 2021(2): 296-297.
[9] Raj, R., Scales, D.C. and Boyd, J.G. (2021) Coagulopathy and Long-Term Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 91, 621-627.
[10] 王磊, 张静. 基于深度学习的医学影像在早期肺癌诊断中的研究进展[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2024, 31(3): 225-230.
[11] Levi, M. and Ten Cate, H. (2023) Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Trauma: Current Perspectives. The New England Journal of Medicine, 388, 1145-1154.
[12] 杨立颖, 吴海涛. 低分子肝素干预对重症创伤性脑损伤患者深静脉血栓形成风险的影响评估[J]. 医学论坛, 2025, 7(23): 131-134.
[13] 陈江, 夏小学, 高树山, 等. 蛋白C途径和血流灌注不足在创伤性脑损伤后凝血功能异常中的作用[Z]. 长兴县人民医院, 2017.
[14] 佘坤, 李秀山, 莫荣波, 等. IRAK4通过调控Nrf2/HO-1信号通路对创伤性脑损伤后神经元铁死亡的作用研究[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2026, 47(1): 65-71, 77.
[15] 王晓成, 程诗桐, 陈建强. 创伤性脑损伤后认知功能障碍发生机制的研究进展[J]. 中南医学科学杂志, 2026, 54(1): 184-188.
[16] 张彤, 王妍, 杨春佳, 等. 功能性水凝胶在创伤性脑损伤组织修复中的作用[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2025, 29(28): 6110-6117.
[17] 史汉童, 陈文, 郭彦谷, 等. 炎症指标对创伤性脑损伤后阵发性交感神经亢进的预测价值: 单中心回顾性病例对照研究[J]. 海军军医大学学报, 2025, 46(3): 330-335.
[18] 崔阳, 郑里强, 杨晶, 等. 高压氧治疗重型创伤性脑损伤作用机制的研究进展[J]. 中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志, 2025, 32(5): 445-449.
[19] 王梅, 刘慧, 叶玲. 高压氧联合丰富环境量化刺激治疗创伤性脑损伤42例疗效观察[J]. 中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志, 2025, 32(10): 1067-1072.
[20] 赵睿婷, 周菊, 田野, 等. 基于竞争性内源性RNA调节网络创伤性脑损伤急性期关键基因的筛选与分析[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2025, 42(6): 1084-1087.
[21] 王晓娇, 王栋, 田婷, 等. 小胶质细胞在创伤性脑损伤后认知功能障碍中的驱动机制[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2025, 51(11): 671-676.
[22] 李坤航, 张俊悦, 张旭东, 等. 小鼠创伤性脑损伤后损伤周边区脑血管形态变化及其对脑血流恢复的影响[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2025, 54(12): 1076-1081.