考虑消费者跨期囤货的AI直播供应链促销研究
A Study on AI-Powered Live Streaming Supply Chain Promotions Considering Consumers’ Intertemporal Stockpiling Behavior
摘要: 本文构建了一个由品牌商与采用AI主播的网络零售商组成的两期直播供应链博弈模型,考察在消费者存在跨期购买与囤货行为的情境下,不同促销策略对供应链定价与利润分配的影响。研究比较了“买一送一”(BOGO)、“阶段性降价”(PR)与“天天低价”(EDLP)三类典型促销机制。研究结果发现:在AI直播背景下,当消费者持有成本较高时,BOGO策略因有效激励即时批量购买而优于EDLP;PR策略仅在持有成本与边际估值因子满足特定区间条件时才具备优势。进一步地,BOGO策略下的批发价格与供应链利润均随持有成本上升而提高,而PR策略则呈现相反趋势。相比之下,EDLP策略凭借其价格稳定性及对跨期行为协调需求的弱依赖,在持有成本较低或信息不对称程度较高的环境中展现出更强的稳健性。在AI驱动的直播电商环境中,消费者的囤货行为如何影响供应链上下游之间的博弈均衡,也为品牌商与采用数字人技术的零售商在促销策略选择、定价协同与AI投入回报优化方面提供了重要的理论依据与实践启示。
Abstract: This paper constructs a two-stage live-streaming supply chain game model involving brand manufacturers and online retailers employing AI hosts. It examines how different promotional strategies impact supply chain pricing and profit distribution when consumers engage in cross-period purchasing and stockpiling behaviors. The study compares three typical promotional mechanisms: Buy One Get One Free (BOGO), Periodic Discounting (PR), and Everyday Low Pricing (EDLP). Findings reveal that under AI-streaming conditions, when consumer holding costs are high, the BOGO strategy outperforms EDLP by effectively incentivizing immediate bulk purchases. The PR strategy only gains an advantage when holding costs and marginal valuation factors fall within specific ranges. Furthermore, wholesale prices and supply chain profits under BOGO increase with rising holding costs, while PR exhibits the opposite trend. In contrast, the EDLP strategy demonstrates greater robustness in environments with low holding costs or high information asymmetry, owing to its price stability and minimal reliance on intertemporal behavioral coordination. How consumer stockpiling behavior influences the equilibrium of supply chain interactions within AI-driven livestream e-commerce also provides crucial theoretical foundations and practical insights for brands and retailers utilizing digital avatar technology in promotional strategy selection, pricing coordination, and optimizing AI investment returns.
文章引用:李浩镛. 考虑消费者跨期囤货的AI直播供应链促销研究[J]. 管理科学与工程, 2026, 15(2): 415-428. https://doi.org/10.12677/mse.2026.152041

参考文献

[1] Blattberg, R.C., Eppen, G.D. and Lieberman, J. (1981) A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Price Deals for Consumer Nondurables. Journal of Marketing, 45, 116-129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Blattberg, R.C. and Levin, A. (1987) Modelling the Effectiveness and Profitability of Trade Promotions. Marketing Science, 6, 124-146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Assunção, J.L. and Meyer, R.J. (1993) The Rational Effect of Price Promotions on Sales and Consumption. Management Science, 39, 517-535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Gönül, F. and Srinivasan, K. (1996) Estimating the Impact of Consumer Expectations of Coupons on Purchase Behavior: A Dynamic Structural Model. Marketing Science, 15, 262-279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Chan, T., Narasimhan, C. and Zhang, Q. (2008) Decomposing Promotional Effects with a Dynamic Structural Model of Flexible Consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 487-498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Sinha, I. and Smith, M.F. (2000) Consumers’ Perceptions of Promotional Framing of Price. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 257-275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Hardesty, D.M. and Bearden, W.O. (2003) Consumer Evaluations of Different Promotion Types and Price Presentations: The Moderating Role of Promotional Benefit Level. Journal of Retailing, 79, 17-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Kamins, M.A., Folkes, V.S. and Fedorikhin, A. (2009) Promotional Bundles and Consumers’ Price Judgments: When the Best Things in Life Are Not Free. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 660-670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Gordon-Hecker, T., Pittarello, A., Shalvi, S. and Roskes, M. (2020) Buy-One-Get-One-Free Deals Attract More Attention than Percentage Deals. Journal of Business Research, 111, 128-134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Kim, K., Lee, C. and Park, S. (2016) Dynamic Pricing with ‘BOGO’ Promotion in Revenue Management. International Journal of Production Research, 54, 5283-5302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Ailawadi, K.L., Harlam, B.A., César, J. and Trounce, D. (2006) Promotion Profitability for a Retailer: The Role of Promotion, Brand, Category, and Store Characteristics. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 518-535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Corbett, C.J. and de Groote, X. (2000) A Supplier’s Optimal Quantity Discount Policy under Asymmetric Information. Management Science, 46, 444-450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Cho, S., McCardle, K.F. and Tang, C.S. (2009) Optimal Pricing and Rebate Strategies in a Two‐Level Supply Chain. Production and Operations Management, 18, 426-446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Levin, Y., Nediak, M. and Bazhanov, A. (2014) Quantity Premiums and Discounts in Dynamic Pricing. Operations Research, 62, 846-863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Lu, Y., Chen, Y., Song, M. and Yan, X. (2014) Optimal Pricing and Inventory Control Policy with Quantity-Based Price Differentiation. Operations Research, 62, 512-523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Liu, Y. and Zhang, Z.J. (2006) Research Note—The Benefits of Personalized Pricing in a Channel. Marketing Science, 25, 97-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Adida, E. and Özer, Ö. (2019) Why Markdown as a Pricing Modality? Management Science, 65, 2161-2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 胡娇, 李莉, 张华, 等. 考虑参照效应和主播影响力的网络直播平台动态定价决策[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(3): 755-766.
[19] 刘洋, 李琪, 殷猛. 网络购物节氛围对消费者冲动购物行为的刺激作用[J]. 商业研究, 2018(7): 18-23.
[20] Hsin Chang, H. and Wen Chen, S. (2008) The Impact of Online Store Environment Cues on Purchase Intention: Trust and Perceived Risk as a Mediator. Online Information Review, 32, 818-841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Liu, Y., Li, H. and Hu, F. (2013) Website Attributes in Urging Online Impulse Purchase: An Empirical Investigation on Consumer Perceptions. Decision Support Systems, 55, 829-837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Tong, J. (2017) A Study on the Effect of Web Live Broadcast on Consumers’ Willingness to Purchase. Open Journal of Business and Management, 5, 280-289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Liu, F., Meng, L., Chen, S., et al. (2020) The Impact of Network Celebrities’ Information Source Characteristics on Purchase Intention. Chinese Journal of Management, 17, 94-104.
[24] 王玉燕, 丁露萍, 霍宝锋. 直播电商供应链中制造商的直播引入策略研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2025, 45(5): 1471-1493.
[25] Du, Z., Fan, Z. and Sun, F. (2023) Live Streaming Sales: Streamer Type Choice and Limited Sales Strategy for a Manufacturer. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 61, Article 101300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Wang, L., Song, Y. and Fan, T.J. (2024) Strategies of Manufacturers Introducing Live Streaming. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 32, 276-284.
[27] Zhen, X., Wang, P. and Li, X. (2024) The Streamer’s Sales Strategy Choice Considering Sales Effort. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78, Article 103745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] 王翠翠, 徐静, 秦海生, 等. 电商主播类型对消费者购买行为的影响: AI主播和真人主播[J]. 管理科学, 2023, 36(4): 30-43.
[29] Niu, B., Yu, X. and Dong, J. (2023) Could AI Livestream Perform Better than KOL in Cross-Border Operations? Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 174, Article 103130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] 程永伟. 直播带货的合作模式与决策优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 297-306.
[31] Baucells, M. and Sarin, R.K. (2007) Satiation in Discounted Utility. Operations Research, 55, 170-181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Baucells, M. and Sarin, R.K. (2010) Predicting Utility under Satiation and Habit Formation. Management Science, 56, 286-301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Özer, Ö. and Zheng, Y. (2016) Markdown or Everyday Low Price? The Role of Behavioral Motives. Management Science, 62, 326-346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef