免疫组化标志物在胰腺导管腺癌临床评估中的应用进展
Advances in the Application of Immunohistochemical Markers in the Clinical Evaluation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
摘要: 胰腺导管腺癌(pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, PDAC)是恶性程度最高的消化系统肿瘤之一,侵袭性强,生物学异质性极大,故而现有手段尚难以充分获得患者生存获益。因此,更准确的肿瘤评估及更好的风险分层是推进个体化治疗的前提。免疫组化(immunohistochemistry, IHC)由于可及性好,又对常规病理标本有极好的适用性,在胰腺癌临床管理中已有基础而重要的地位,近年来已从传统的诊断支持技术自然、合理地拓展到预后评估及治疗反应预测领域。近年来学界对PDAC中多种免疫组化标志物的临床价值已有十分系统、充分的讨论,明确指出多指标联合检测有利于提高良恶性病变的鉴别能力,也有利于确定肿瘤来源。更重要的是,与细胞增殖、抑癌通路异常、上皮–间质转化及肿瘤免疫微环境相关的蛋白表达模式在风险评估中已有很好的应用前景。与此形成极好补充的是,免疫相关及分子替代指标正在成为筛选潜在治疗获益人群的新方向。然而,由于目前多数标志物尚无统一检测标准,故现有研究结果有明显异质性,单一指标又不能充分反映PDAC复杂的生物学本质,因此可以很自然、妥帖地预期今后的发展方向是构建多参数整合模型,把免疫组化、分子检测及数字病理技术三者深度融合,由此建立真正精准、临床可操作的综合评估体系。本文对免疫组化标志物在胰腺导管腺癌中的临床应用作了十分清楚、有层次的综述,先总结其在诊断鉴别、预后分层、治疗相关预测诸方面的研究进展,再自然、妥帖地讨论现存问题及今后方向,对胰腺癌的精准管理有极好启示。
Abstract: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most malignant tumors in the digestive system, with strong invasiveness and significant biological heterogeneity. Therefore, current treatment methods have not been able to fully benefit patients in terms of survival. Thus, more accurate tumor assessment and better risk stratification are prerequisites for advancing personalized treatment. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has a fundamental and important position in the clinical management of pancreatic cancer due to its good accessibility and excellent applicability to routine pathological specimens. In recent years, it has naturally and reasonably expanded from a traditional diagnostic support technique to the fields of prognosis assessment and treatment response prediction. In recent years, the academic community has had a very systematic and thorough discussion on the clinical value of multiple IHC markers in PDAC, clearly indicating that the combined detection of multiple indicators is beneficial for improving the ability to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions and determining the tumor origin. More importantly, protein expression patterns related to cell proliferation, abnormal tumor suppressor pathways, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and the tumor immune microenvironment have shown good application prospects in risk assessment. Complementing this, immune-related and molecular surrogate markers are becoming new directions for screening potential treatment-benefited populations. However, due to the lack of unified detection standards for most of the current biomarkers, the existing research results show significant heterogeneity. Moreover, a single indicator cannot fully reflect the complex biological nature of PDAC. Therefore, it is quite natural and appropriate to expect that the future development direction will be to build a multi-parameter integrated model, deeply integrating immunohistochemistry, molecular detection, and digital pathology technologies, thereby establishing a truly precise and clinically operable comprehensive assessment system. This article provides a very clear and well-structured review of the clinical application of immunohistochemical markers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. It first summarizes the research progress in diagnosis and differentiation, prognosis stratification, and treatment-related prediction, and then naturally and appropriately discusses the existing problems and future directions. It offers excellent guidance for the precise management of pancreatic cancer.
文章引用:梁长雄, 祖少奇, 朱洪. 免疫组化标志物在胰腺导管腺癌临床评估中的应用进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(3): 3067-3077. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1631112

参考文献

[1] Cai, J., Chen, H., Lu, M., Zhang, Y., Lu, B., You, L., et al. (2021) Advances in the Epidemiology of Pancreatic Cancer: Trends, Risk Factors, Screening, and Prognosis. Cancer Letters, 520, 1-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Adsay, N.V., Bandyopadhyay, S., Basturk, O., Othman, M., Cheng, J.D., Klöppel, G., et al. (2004) Chronic Pancreatitis or Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma? Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology, 21, 268-276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Sun, J., Awad, M.A., Hwang, J. and Villano, A.M. (2025) Molecular Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Prognostication of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 15, Article 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Liu, H., Shi, J., Anandan, V., Wang, H.L., Diehl, D., Blansfield, J., et al. (2012) Reevaluation and Identification of the Best Immunohistochemical Panel (pVHL, Maspin, S100P, IMP-3) for Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 136, 601-609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Deng, H., Shi, J., Wilkerson, M., Meschter, S., Dupree, W. and Lin, F. (2008) Usefulness of S100P in Diagnosis of Adenocarcinoma of Pancreas on Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Specimens. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 129, 81-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Bailey, P., Chang, D.K., Nones, K., Johns, A.L., Patch, A., Gingras, M., et al. (2016) Genomic Analyses Identify Molecular Subtypes of Pancreatic Cancer. Nature, 531, 47-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Luu, T.T. (2021) Review of Immunohistochemistry Biomarkers in Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis. Frontiers in Oncology, 11, Article 799025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Collisson, E.A., Sadanandam, A., Olson, P., Gibb, W.J., Truitt, M., Gu, S., et al. (2011) Subtypes of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Their Differing Responses to Therapy. Nature Medicine, 17, 500-503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Ezzat, N.E., Tahoun, N.S. and Ismail, Y.M. (2016) The Role of S100P and IMP3 in the Cytologic Diagnosis of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 28, 229-234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Moffitt, R.A., Marayati, R., Flate, E.L., Volmar, K.E., Loeza, S.G.H., Hoadley, K.A., et al. (2015) Virtual Microdissection Identifies Distinct Tumor-and Stroma-Specific Subtypes of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Nature Genetics, 47, 1168-1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Blise, K.E., Sivagnanam, S., Betts, C.B., Betre, K., Kirchberger, N., Tate, B.J., et al. (2024) Machine Learning Links T-Cell Function and Spatial Localization to Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy and Clinical Outcome in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Immunology Research, 12, 544-558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Fitzgibbons, P.L., Bradley, L.A., Fatheree, L.A., Alsabeh, R., Fulton, R.S., Goldsmith, J.D., et al. (2014) Principles of Analytic Validation of Immunohistochemical Assays: Guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 138, 1432-1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Goldsmith, J.D., Troxell, M.L., Roy-Chowdhuri, S., Colasacco, C.F., Edgerton, M.E., Fitzgibbons, P.L., et al. (2024) Principles of Analytic Validation of Immunohistochemical Assays: Guideline Update. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 148, e111-e153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Nash, J.W., Bhardwaj, A., Wen, P. and Frankel, W.L. (2007) Maspin Is Useful in the Distinction of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma from Chronic Pancreatitis. Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology, 15, 59-63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Fernández Moro, C., Fernandez-Woodbridge, A., Alistair D’souza, M., Zhang, Q., Bozoky, B., Kandaswamy, S.V., et al. (2016) Immunohistochemical Typing of Adenocarcinomas of the Pancreatobiliary System Improves Diagnosis and Prognostic Stratification. PLOS ONE, 11, e0166067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Thompson, E.D. and Wood, L.D. (2019) Pancreatic Neoplasms with Acinar Differentiation: A Review of Pathologic and Molecular Features. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 144, 808-815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Shibayama, T., Hayashi, A., Toki, M., Kitahama, K., Ho, Y., Kato, K., et al. (2024) Combination Immunohistochemistry for CK5/6, P63, GATA6, and Hnf4a Predicts Clinical Outcome in Treatment-Naïve Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 15598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Martinelli, P., Carrillo-de Santa Pau, E., Cox, T., Sainz, B., Dusetti, N., Greenhalf, W., et al. (2016) GATA6 Regulates EMT and Tumour Dissemination, and Is a Marker of Response to Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer. Gut, 66, 1665-1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Wartenberg, M., Cibin, S., Zlobec, I., Vassella, E., Eppenberger-Castori, S., Terracciano, L., et al. (2018) Integrated Genomic and Immunophenotypic Classification of Pancreatic Cancer Reveals Three Distinct Subtypes with Prognostic/Predictive Significance. Clinical Cancer Research, 24, 4444-4454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Martens, S., Lefesvre, P., Nicolle, R., Biankin, A.V., Puleo, F., Van Laethem, J.L., et al. (2019) Different Shades of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Different Paths Towards Precision Therapeutic Applications. Annals of Oncology, 30, 1428-1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Robertson, F.P., Cameron, A., Spiers, H.V.M., Joseph, N., Taylor, E., Ratnayake, B., et al. (2024) Evidence for Molecular Subtyping in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review. HPB, 26, 609-617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] O’Kane, G.M., Grünwald, B.T., Jang, G., Masoomian, M., Picardo, S., Grant, R.C., et al. (2020) GATA6 Expression Distinguishes Classical and Basal-Like Subtypes in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 26, 4901-4910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Aksoy-Altinboga, A., Baglan, T., Umudum, H. and Ceyhan, K. (2018) Diagnostic Value of S100P, IMP3, Maspin, and pVHL in the Differantial Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Normal/Chronic Pancreatitis in Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy. Journal of Cytology, 35, 247-251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Ansari, D., Rosendahl, A., Elebro, J. and Andersson, R. (2011) Systematic Review of Immunohistochemical Biomarkers to Identify Prognostic Subgroups of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 98, 1041-1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Jamieson, N.B., Carter, C.R., McKay, C.J. and Oien, K.A. (2011) Tissue Biomarkers for Prognosis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clinical Cancer Research, 17, 3316-3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Petrushnko, W., Gundara, J.S., De Reuver, P.R., O’Grady, G., Samra, J.S. and Mittal, A. (2016) Systematic Review of Peri-Operative Prognostic Biomarkers in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. HPB, 18, 652-663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Pergolini, I., Crippa, S., Pagnanelli, M., Belfiori, G., Pucci, A., Partelli, S., et al. (2019) Prognostic Impact of Ki‐67 Proliferative Index in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. BJS Open, 3, 646-655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Handra-Luca, A., Hong, S., Walter, K., Wolfgang, C., Hruban, R. and Goggins, M. (2011) Tumour Epithelial Vimentin Expression and Outcome of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas. British Journal of Cancer, 104, 1296-1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Myoteri, D., Dellaportas, D., Lykoudis, P.M., Apostolopoulos, A., Marinis, A. and Zizi-Sermpetzoglou, A. (2017) Prognostic Evaluation of Vimentin Expression in Correlation with Ki67 and CD44 in Surgically Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2017, Article ID: 9207616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Gu, J., Gao, F., Fan, B., Xu, S., Luo, H., Zhang, J., et al. (2023) Correlation between Macrophage Polarization and Pd-L1-Related Tumor Microenvironmental Alteration and Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Journal of Oncology, 2023, Article ID: 7971306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Barreto, S.G. and Sirohi, B. (2019) Is It Time to Reconsider the Principles of Pancreatic Cancer Surgery? Pancreatology, 19, 204-205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Buscail, L., Bournet, B., Dufresne, M., Torrisani, J. and Cordelier, P. (2015) Nouveautés dans la biologie du cancer du pancréas. Bulletin du Cancer, 102, S53-S61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Lim, Y.J., Lee, J.K., Park, C.K., Song, S.Y., Jang, W.Y., Ha, H.Y., et al. (2004) Prognostic Value of VEGF in Human Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 19, 10-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] McGuigan, A.J., Coleman, H.G., McCain, R.S., Kelly, P.J., Johnston, D.I., Taylor, M.A., et al. (2021) Immune Cell Infiltrates as Prognostic Biomarkers in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research, 7, 99-112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Breaza, G.M., Closca, R.M., Cindrea, A.C., Hut, F.E., Cretu, O., Sima, L.V., et al. (2025) Immunohistochemical Evaluation of the Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Diagnostics, 15, Article 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Gao, H., Liu, L., Qi, Z., Xu, H., Wang, W., Wu, C., et al. (2018) The Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of PD-L1 Expression in Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, 17, 95-100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Zhuan-Sun, Y., Huang, F., Feng, M., Zhao, X., Chen, W., Zhu, Z., et al. (2017) Prognostic Value of PD-L1 Overexpression for Pancreatic Cancer: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis. OncoTargets and Therapy, 10, 5005-5012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Hu, Y., Chen, W., Yan, Z., Ma, J., Zhu, F. and Huo, J. (2019) Prognostic Value of PD-L1 Expression in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. Medicine, 98, e14006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Mo, S., Ma, H., Lu, Z., Yu, S., et al. (2022) PD‐l1 and PD‐l2 Expression in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Their Correlation with Immune Infiltrates and DNA Damage Response Molecules. The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research, 8, 257-267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Luchini, C., Brosens, L.A.A., Wood, L.D., Chatterjee, D., Shin, J.I., Sciammarella, C., et al. (2020) Comprehensive Characterisation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Microsatellite Instability: Histology, Molecular Pathology and Clinical Implications. Gut, 70, 148-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Kaplan, Z., Prezioso, E., Jain, A., Lavu, H., Yeo, C.J., Bowne, W.B., et al. (2025) Clinical Implications of Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Medicine, 14, e70960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Ariel, A. and Timor, O. (2012) Hanging in the Balance: Endogenous Anti‐Inflammatory Mechanisms in Tissue Repair and Fibrosis. The Journal of Pathology, 229, 250-263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Koperek, O., Aumayr, K., Schindl, M., Werba, G., Soleiman, A., Schoppmann, S., et al. (2013) Phosphorylation of STAT3 Correlates with HER2 Status, but Not with Survival in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. APMIS, 122, 476-481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Yasuta, S., Yamauchi, J., Miyazaki, K., Sato, M., Ikeda, T., Fujita, S., Shirasaki, K., Kobayashi, S., Ajiki, T., Tsuchihara, K., Kondo, N. and Ishiyama, S. (2016) A Case of Advanced Gastric Cancer with Extensive Lymph Node Metastases Treated by Capecitabine plus Cisplatin plus Trastuzumab Chemotherapy, Followed by Conversion Surgery. Gan to Kagaku Ryoho. Cancer & Chemotherapy, 43, 1923-1925.
[45] King, D.A., Smith, A.R., Pineda, G., Nakano, M., Michelini, F., Goedegebuure, S.P., et al. (2023) Complete Remission of Widely Metastatic Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Amplified Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma after Precision Immune and Targeted Therapy with Description of Sequencing and Organoid Correlates. JCO Precision Oncology, 7, e2100489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Kimura, K., Sawada, T., Komatsu, M., Inoue, M., Muguruma, K., Nishihara, T., et al. (2006) Antitumor Effect of Trastuzumab for Pancreatic Cancer with High HER-2 Expression and Enhancement of Effect by Combined Therapy with Gemcitabine. Clinical Cancer Research, 12, 4925-4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] Nordh, S. (2014) Hent1 Expression Is Predictive of Gemcitabine Outcome in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 20, 8482-8490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[48] Bird, N.T.E., Elmasry, M., Jones, R., Psarelli, E., Dodd, J., Malik, H., et al. (2017) Immunohistochemical Hent1 Expression as a Prognostic Biomarker in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Adjuvant Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy. British Journal of Surgery, 104, 328-336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[49] Ormanns, S., Heinemann, V., Raponi, M., Isaacson, J., Laubender, R.P., Haas, M., et al. (2014) Human Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 Is Not Predictive for Gemcitabine Efficacy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Translational Results from the AIO-PK0104 Phase III Study with the Clone SP120 Rabbit Antibody. European Journal of Cancer, 50, 1891-1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[50] Santini, D., Schiavon, G., Vincenzi, B., E. Cass, C., Vasile, E., D. Manazza, A., et al. (2011) Human Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 (hENT1) Levels Predict Response to Gemcitabine in Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC). Current Cancer Drug Targets, 11, 123-129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Raffenne, J., Nicolle, R., Puleo, F., Le Corre, D., Boyez, C., Marechal, R., et al. (2019) Hent1 Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Are We Ready? A Multimodal Evaluation of Hent1 Status. Cancers, 11, Article 1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[52] Farrell, J.J., Elsaleh, H., Garcia, M., Lai, R., Ammar, A., Regine, W.F., et al. (2009) Human Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 Levels Predict Response to Gemcitabine in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. Gastroenterology, 136, 187-195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[53] Sinn, M., Riess, H., Sinn, B.V., Stieler, J.M., Pelzer, U., Striefler, J.K., et al. (2015) Human Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 Expression Analysed by the Clone SP 120 Rabbit Antibody Is Not Predictive in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Adjuvant Gemcitabine—Results from the CONKO-001 Trial. European Journal of Cancer, 51, 1546-1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[54] Baxi, V., Edwards, R., Montalto, M. and Saha, S. (2022) Digital Pathology and Artificial Intelligence in Translational Medicine and Clinical Practice. Modern Pathology, 35, 23-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[55] Weselá, P., Eid, M., Moravčík, P., Vlažný, J., Hlavsa, J., Procházka, V., et al. (2025) Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cancer Histopathology and Diagnostics—Implications for Clinical Decisions and Biomarker Discovery? Cell Division, 20, Article No. 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[56] McShane, L.M., Altman, D.G., Sauerbrei, W., Taube, S.E., Gion, M. and Clark, G.M. (2005) Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (Remark). JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 97, 1180-1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[57] Sauerbrei, W., Taube, S.E., McShane, L.M., Cavenagh, M.M. and Altman, D.G. (2018) Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 110, 803-811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[58] Nielsen, S., Bzorek, M., Vyberg, M. and Røge, R. (2022) Lessons Learned, Challenges Taken, and Actions Made for “precision” Immunohistochemistry. Analysis and Perspectives from the NordiQC Proficiency Testing Program. Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology, 31, 452-458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[59] Vyberg, M. and Nielsen, S. (2015) Proficiency Testing in Immunohistochemistry—EXPERIENCES from Nordic Immunohistochemical Quality Control (NordiQC). Virchows Archiv, 468, 19-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[60] Le, N., Sund, M., Vinci, A., Beyer, G., Ashan Javed, M., Krug, S., et al. (2016) Prognostic and Predictive Markers in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Digestive and Liver Disease, 48, 223-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[61] Marchiò, C., Scaltriti, M., Ladanyi, M., Iafrate, A.J., Bibeau, F., Dietel, M., et al. (2019) ESMO Recommendations on the Standard Methods to Detect NTRK Fusions in Daily Practice and Clinical Research. Annals of Oncology, 30, 1417-1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[62] Hechtman, J.F., Benayed, R., Hyman, D.M., Drilon, A., Zehir, A., Frosina, D., et al. (2017) Pan-Trk Immunohistochemistry Is an Efficient and Reliable Screen for the Detection of NTRK Fusions. American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 41, 1547-1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[63] Hondelink, L.M., Schrader, A.M.R., Asri Aghmuni, G., Solleveld-Westerink, N., Cleton-Jansen, A., van Egmond, D., et al. (2022) The Sensitivity of Pan-Trk Immunohistochemistry in Solid Tumours: A Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Cancer, 173, 229-237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[64] Park, S., Shin, K., Kim, I., Hong, T., Kim, Y., Suh, J., et al. (2023) Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients with Claudin-18 Overexpression. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12, Article 5394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[65] Wöll, S., Schlitter, A.M., Dhaene, K., Roller, M., Esposito, I., Sahin, U., et al. (2013) Claudin 18.2 Is a Target for IMAB362 Antibody in Pancreatic Neoplasms. International Journal of Cancer, 134, 731-739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[66] Kyuno, D., Yanazume, K., Saito, A.C., Ono, Y., Ito, T., Imamura, M., et al. (2025) Concordance of Claudin-18.2 Expression in Biopsy, Resection, and Recurrent Specimens: Implications for Zolbetuximab Therapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Tissue Barriers, 14, Article ID: 2535047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[67] Solomon, J.P., Linkov, I., Rosado, A., Mullaney, K., Rosen, E.Y., Frosina, D., et al. (2020) NTRK Fusion Detection across Multiple Assays and 33,997 Cases: Diagnostic Implications and Pitfalls. Modern Pathology, 33, 38-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]