灵活用工模式下社会保险的法律适用困境与制度保障路径研究
Research on the Legal Application Dilemmas and Institutional Security Paths of Social Insurance under the Flexible Employment Mode
DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2026.143076, PDF,   
作者: 胡 博:宁波大学马克思主义学院,浙江 宁波
关键词: 灵活用工社会保险法律适用制度保障Flexible Employment Social Insurance Legal Application Institutional Security
摘要: 灵活用工模式作为数字经济时代的新型就业形式,在促进就业灵活性和经济增长的同时,也带来了社会保险法律适用的诸多困境。我国现行社会保险制度以“全日制劳动关系”为预设前提,与灵活用工“灵活性、流动性、非典型性”的特征适配性不足,导致社会保险参保率低、权益保障不足等问题,也制约了灵活用工市场的健康发展。本文立足灵活用工的多元形态与实践现状,剖析灵活用工模式下社会保险法律适用的现实困境,从立法完善、缴费机制优化、监管体系强化、司法救济完善四个维度,构建一套能够适配多元用工需求的社保保障框架,以期实现灵活用工主体权益与用工市场有序发展的双重平衡,为数字时代社会保险法治建设提供理论支撑与实践指引。
Abstract: As a new form of employment in the era of digital economy, the flexible employment mode has brought about many dilemmas in the legal application of social insurance while promoting employment flexibility and economic growth. China’s current social insurance system is based on the prerequisite of “full-time labor relations”, which is insufficiently adaptable to the “flexibility, mobility, and atypicality” of flexible employment. This has led to problems such as low participation rates in social insurance and insufficient protection of rights and interests, which also restricts the healthy development of the flexible employment market. Based on the diverse forms and practical status of flexible employment, this paper analyzes the practical dilemmas of the legal application of social insurance under the flexible employment mode. From the four dimensions of legislative improvement, optimization of payment mechanisms, strengthening of the supervision system, and improvement of judicial remedies, it constructs a social insurance security framework that can adapt to diverse employment needs. The aim is to achieve a dual balance between the rights and interests of flexible employment subjects and the orderly development of the employment market, providing theoretical support and practical guidance for the rule of law construction of social insurance in the digital era.
文章引用:胡博. 灵活用工模式下社会保险的法律适用困境与制度保障路径研究 [J]. 法学, 2026, 14(3): 128-135. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.143076

参考文献

[1] 人数超8000万!新型灵活就业群体“时间灵活但不清闲” [EB/OL]. https://news.sohu.com/a/909382321_161795
[2] 娄宇. “不完全劳动关系”与新就业形态劳动基准权的规范构造[J]. 人权法学, 2025, 4(2): 56-76+163-164.
[3] 谢增毅. 我国平台用工规制路径的反思与改进[J]. 中外法学, 2024, 36(2): 386-406.
[4] 王全兴. 劳动法[M]. 第5版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020: 289-292.
[5] 杨浩宇. 新业态下劳动关系认定研究[J]. 法学前沿, 2025, 1(8): 22-26.
[6] 范围. 互联网平台从业人员的权利保障困境及其司法裁判分析[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2019, 36(12): 134-143.
[7] 娄宇. 劳动关系从属性理论的历史演进与现实反思——兼论“不完全劳动关系” [J]. 政治与法律, 2024(8): 2-19.
[8] 梁平, 张沁峰. 新型劳动关系的相关法律问题研究[J]. 山东社会科学, 2025(12): 73-83.
[9] 赵青. 互联网平台灵活就业群体的社会保障困境与制度优化路径[J]. 中州学刊, 2021(7): 96-102.
[10] 袁文全, 毛嘉. 新就业形态劳动者社会保险权益保障的法治进路[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 78(5): 188-200.
[11] 沈建峰. 劳动基准法的范畴、规范结构与私法效力[J]. 法学研究, 2021, 43(2): 76-94.
[12] 王天玉. 从身份到行为: 劳动法规范构造的转型[J]. 中国社会科学, 2025(5): 36-53+205.
[13] 柴伟伟, 程磊. 互联网平台用工模式下劳动关系之认定: 新业态下的司法困境与路径探索[J]. 河北法学, 2024, 42(7): 163-180.
[14] 贾孟奇. 互联网新业态中劳动者权益保护的困境与突破[J]. 绥化学院学报, 2024, 44(9): 26-29.
[15] 娄宇. 平台经济从业者社会保险法律制度的构建[J]. 法学研究, 2020, 42(2): 190-208.