|
[1]
|
Saussure, F.D. (1916) Cours de linguistique générale. Payot.
|
|
[2]
|
Chomsky, N. (1986) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Praeger.
|
|
[3]
|
Goldberg, A.E. (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. The University of Chicago Press.
|
|
[4]
|
Larson, R.K. (1988) On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335-391.
|
|
[5]
|
Newmeyer, F.J. (2002) Optimality and Functionality: A Critique of Functionally-Based Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 20, 43-80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
Kay, P. and Fillmore, C.J. (1999) Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What’s X Doing Y? Construction. Language, 75, 68-103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T. and Baayen, R.H. (2007) Predicting the Dative Alternation. In: Boume, G., Kraemer, I. and Zwarts, J., Eds., Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 69-94.
|
|
[8]
|
Closs Traugott, E. (2008) Grammaticalization, Constructions and the Incremental Development of Language: Suggestions from the Development of Degree Modifiers in English. In: Eckardt, R., Jäger, G. and Veenstra, T., Eds., Variation, Selection, Development, Mouton de Gruyter, 219-252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
Halliday, M.A. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. Arnold, 136 p.
|
|
[10]
|
Biber, D. (1988) Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[11]
|
Thompson, S.A. (2002) “Object Complements” and Conversation Towards a Realistic Account. Studies in Language, 26, 125-163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[12]
|
Stefanowitsch, A. and Gries, S.T. (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8, 209-243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[13]
|
Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G. and Peirsman, Y. (2010) Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics (Vol. 45). Walter de Gruyter.
|
|
[14]
|
Biber, D. and Conrad, S. (2019) Register, Genre, and Style. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[15]
|
Bresnan, J. and Hay, J. (2008) Gradient Grammar: An Effect of Animacy on the Syntax of Give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua, 118, 245-259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[16]
|
Szmrecsanyi, B., Rosseel, L., Grafmiller, J. and Engel, A. (2022) Assessing the Complexity of Lectal Competence: The Register-Specificity of the Dative Alternation after Give. Cognitive Linguistics, 33, 727-766.
|
|
[17]
|
Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T. and Baayen, R.H. (2007) Predicting the Dative Alternation. In: Bouma, G., Krämer, I. and Zwarts, J., Eds., Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, KNAW, 69-94.
|
|
[18]
|
Hawkins, J.A. (1994) A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency (No. 73). Cambridge University Press.
|
|
[19]
|
Röthlisberger, M., Grafmiller, J. and Szmrecsanyi, B. (2017) Cognitive Indigenization Effects in the English Dative Alternation. Cognitive Linguistics, 28, 673-710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|