CDNO:面向连续动态物理系统的通道分解神经算子
CDNO: Channel-Decomposed Neural Operator for Continuous Dynamical Physical Systems
摘要: 神经算子为偏微分方程(PDE)的快速近似求解提供了数据驱动路径,但在连续动态系统中仍面临两类关键挑战。其一,现有方法往往难以显式刻画随时间演化的动态模态,导致长时间预测的稳定性与可解释性受限。其二,频率敏感结构在深度传播过程中容易发生混叠并引起高频细节衰减,从而影响物理敏感区域的还原精度。为缓解上述问题,本文提出通道分解神经算子Channel Decomposed Neural Operator (CDNO),包含两项核心设计。第一,引入极点留数表示法,将算子学习从傅里叶域扩展至拉普拉斯域,以实现显式动态建模。第二,构建通道分解抗混叠架构,通过多分支频率感知通路与受控融合策略增强特征提取的频带分离能力。在涵盖规则网格、结构化网格和点云在内的六项PDE基准测试中,CDNO相对基线方法取得平均15.1%的性能提升,在Burgers方程上提升39.7%,在Navier Stokes方程上提升20.7%。此外,在仅使用80%训练数据的条件下,CDNO即可达到部分基线模型的最优表现,体现出较好的数据效率。进一步的分布外分析表明,现有算子在物理敏感的高频模态上普遍存在明显的性能退化,这提示需要面向高频结构引入更强的物理感知归纳偏置。
Abstract: Neural operators offer a data-driven approach for rapid approximate solving of partial differential equations (PDEs). However, they still confront two key challenges in continuous dynamical systems. First, existing methods often fail to explicitly characterize time-evolving dynamic modes, leading to constrained stability and interpretability in long-term predictions. Second, frequency-sensitive structures are prone to aliasing and high-frequency attenuation during deep propagation, thereby compromising the reconstruction accuracy in physically sensitive regions. To mitigate the aforementioned issues, this paper proposes the Channel-Decomposed Neural Operator (CDNO), which incorporates two core designs. First, we introduce a pole-residue representation that extends operator learning from the Fourier domain to the Laplace domain to enable explicit dynamic modeling. Second, we construct a channel-decomposed anti-aliasing architecture, which enhances the frequency-band separation capability of feature extraction through multi-branch frequency-aware pathways and a controlled fusion strategy. Across six PDE benchmarks covering regular grids, structured meshes, and point clouds, CDNO achieves an average performance improvement of 15.1%, including gains of 39.7% on Burgers’ equation and 20.7% on the Navier-Stokes equations. Moreover, even with only 80% of the training data, CDNO achieves performance comparable to the best baseline models, demonstrating superior data efficiency. Furthermore, out-of-distribution analysis reveals that existing operators commonly exhibit significant performance degradation on physically sensitive high-frequency modes, highlighting the need to introduce stronger physics-aware inductive biases for high-frequency structures.
文章引用:王明, 胡杰. CDNO:面向连续动态物理系统的通道分解神经算子[J]. 人工智能与机器人研究, 2026, 15(2): 502-515. https://doi.org/10.12677/airr.2026.152049

参考文献

[1] Kovachki, N., Li, Z., Liu, B., Azizzadenesheli, K., Bhattacharya, K., Stuart, A. and Anandkumar, A. (2023) Neural Operator: Learning Maps between Function Spaces with Applications to PDEs. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24, 1-97.
[2] Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P. and Karniadakis, G.E. (2019) Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Solving Forward and Inverse Problems Involving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686-707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Lye, K.O., Mishra, S., Ray, D. and Chandrashekar, P. (2021) Iterative Surrogate Model Optimization (ISMO): An Active Learning Algorithm for PDE Constrained Optimization with Deep Neural Networks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 374, Article ID: 113575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Ahmad, I., Ahmad, H., Thounthong, P., Chu, Y. and Cesarano, C. (2020) Solution of Multi-Term Time-Fractional PDE Models Arising in Mathematical Biology and Physics by Local Meshless Method. Symmetry, 12, Article 1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Lu, L., Jin, P., Pang, G., Zhang, Z. and Karniadakis, G.E. (2021) Learning Nonlinear Operators via DeepONet Based on the Universal Approximation Theorem of Operators. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3, 218-229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Chen, T.P. and Chen, H. (1995) Universal Approximation to Nonlinear Operators by Neural Networks with Arbitrary Activation Functions and Its Application to Dynamical Systems. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 6, 911-917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Li, Z., Kovachki, N., Azizzadenesheli, K., Liu, B., Bhattacharya, K., Stuart, A. and Anandkumar, A. (2020) Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations. arXiv: 2010.08895.
[8] Tran, A., Mathews, A., Xie, L. and Ong, C.S. (2021) Factorized Fourier Neural Operators. arXiv: 2111.13802.
[9] Wen, G., Li, Z., Azizzadenesheli, K., Anandkumar, A. and Benson, S.M. (2022) U-Fno—An Enhanced Fourier Neural Operator-Based Deep-Learning Model for Multiphase Flow. Advances in Water Resources, 163, Article ID: 104180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Cao, Q., Goswami, S. and Karniadakis, G.E. (2024) Laplace Neural Operator for Solving Differential Equations. Nature Machine Intelligence, 6, 631-640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Guibas, J., Mardani, M., Li, Z., Tao, A., Anandkumar, A. and Catanzaro, B. (2021) Adaptive Fourier Neural Operators: Efficient Token Mixers for Transformers. arXiv: 2111.13587.
[12] Kossaifi, J., Kovachki, N., Azizzadenesheli, K. and Anandkumar, A. (2023) Multi-Grid Tensorized Fourier Neural Operator for High-Resolution PDEs. arXiv: 2310.00120.
[13] Lyu, H., Sha, N., Qin, S., Yan, M., Xie, Y. and Wang, R. (2019) Manifold Denoising by Nonlinear Robust Principal Component Analysis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32.
[14] Kovachki, N., Lanthaler, S. and Mishra, S. (2021) On Universal Approximation and Error Bounds for Fourier Neural Operators. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22, 1-76.
[15] Li, Z., Zheng, H., Kovachki, N., Jin, D., Chen, H., Liu, B., et al. (2024) Physics-informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equations. ACM/IMS Journal of Data Science, 1, 1-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Lu, L., Jin, P. and Karniadakis, G.E. (2019) DeepONet: Learning Nonlinear Operators for Identifying Differential Equations Based on the Universal Approximation Theorem of Operators. arXiv: 1910.03193.
[17] Hu, S.J., Liu, F., Gao, B. and Li, H. (2016) Pole-Residue Method for Numerical Dynamic Analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 142, 1-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Tiwari, K., Krishnan, N.M.A. and P., P.A. (2025) CoNo: Complex Neural Operator for Continous Dynamical Physical Systems. APL Machine Learning, 3, Article ID: 026101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Bedi, S., Tiwari, K., A. P., P., Kota, S.H. and Krishnan, N.M.A. (2025) A Neural Operator for Forecasting Carbon Monoxide Evolution in Cities. npj Clean Air, 1, Article No. 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Tripura, T. and Chakraborty, S. (2022) Wavelet Neural Operator: A Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations. arXiv: 2205.02191.
[21] Raonic, B., Molinaro, R., Rohner, T., Mishra, S. and Bezenac, E. (2023) Convolutional Neural Operators. ICLR 2023 Workshop on Physics for Machine Learning, 77187-77200.
[22] Dou, H. (2025) Singular Solution of the Navier-Stokes Equation for Plane Poiseuille Flow. Physics of Fluids, 37, Article ID: 084131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Li, Z., Huang, D.Z., Liu, B. and Anandkumar, A. (2023) Fourier Neural Operator with Learned Deformations for PDEs on General Geometries. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24, 1-26.
[24] Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. and Brox, T. (2015) U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W. and Frangi, A., Eds., Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted InterventionMICCAI 2015, Springer, 234-241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. and Sun, J. (2016) Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, 27-30 June 2016, 770-778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Xiong, W., Huang, X., Zhang, Z., Deng, R., Sun, P. and Tian, Y. (2024) Koopman Neural Operator as a Mesh-Free Solver of Non-Linear Partial Differential Equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 513, Article ID: 113194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Rahman, M.A., Ross, Z.E. and Azizzadenesheli, K. (2022) U-No: U-Shaped Neural Operators. arXiv: 2204.11127.
[28] Hendrycks, D., Basart, S., Mu, N., Kadavath, S., Wang, F., Dorundo, E., et al. (2021) The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-Of-Distribution Generalization. 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, 10-17 October 2021, 8320-8329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef