信息源类型与词义解释类型协同影响幼儿的选择性信任:机制与展望
The Synergistic Influence of Information Source Type and Word Meaning Explanation Type on Young Children’s Selective Trust: Mechanisms and Prospects
摘要: 在信息时代,幼儿面临多元信息源的挑战,其选择性信任能力成为早期社会认知与学习的关键。现有研究多孤立探讨信息源类型(“谁在说”)与词义解释类型(“怎么说”)的影响,缺乏对二者协同作用的考察。本综述提出,信息源与解释质量通过协同作用共同塑造幼儿的信任判断,并构建“双线索加工模型”,阐明幼儿如何动态权衡社会–媒介线索与内容质量线索,并依据认知负荷在启发式与系统性加工路径间切换。分析表明,高质量解释可能补偿弱信息源的可信度,高权威信息源或能缓冲低质解释的信任损耗,但相关交互效应仍缺乏直接实证证据。未来需通过多因子实验直接检验交互作用,并借助跨文化比较与神经科学技术深化机制探索,从而开发整合性的教育干预方案,支持幼儿在复杂信息环境中的理性判断与健康成长。
Abstract: In the information age, young children face challenges from diverse information sources, making their ability of selective trust crucial for early social cognition and learning. Existing research often examines the effects of information source type (“who says it”) and word meaning explanation type (“how it is explained”) in isolation, lacking investigation into their synergistic impact. This review proposes that information source and explanation quality jointly shape young children’s trust judgments through synergistic effects. We construct a “dual-cue processing model” to clarify how children dynamically weigh social-media cues and content quality cues, and switch between heuristic and systematic processing pathways based on cognitive load. The analysis suggests that high-quality explanations may compensate for the credibility of weak information sources, while high-authority information sources may buffer the trust loss caused by low-quality explanations. However, direct empirical evidence for such interaction effects remains scarce. Future research should directly examine these interactions through multi-factor experimental paradigms and deepen mechanistic exploration with cross-cultural comparisons and neuroscientific techniques, thereby developing integrated educational intervention programs to support young children’s rational judgment and healthy development in complex information environments.
文章引用:刘雅慧, 宋静, 徐玥, 李柯颖 (2026). 信息源类型与词义解释类型协同影响幼儿的选择性信任:机制与展望. 心理学进展, 16(3), 488-498. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.163164

参考文献

[1] 陈水平, 魏艳苹, 黄晨珊(2023). 词义解释类型对小班幼儿选择性信任能力提升的干预效果研究. 成都师范学院学报, 39(4), 83-90.
[2] 段丹(2022). 选择性信任对儿童防诱拐教育的影响. 科教导刊-电子版(中旬), (11), 282-283.
[3] 李瑞琴(2016). 4-6岁幼儿对不同知识来源信任度的研究. 硕士学位论文, 金华: 浙江师范大学.
[4] 李雨池(2020). 3-6岁幼儿选择性信任研究综述. 幼儿教育, (15), 38-41.
[5] 李喆, 刘浙豫, 毛珂妤, 李婉婷, 李婷玉, 李晶(2023). 3-6岁幼儿对智能语音助手在不同领域的知识性信任. 心理学报, 55(9), 1411-1423.
[6] 唐卫海, 钟汝波, 许晓旭, 刘希平(2019). 面孔吸引力和信息正确性对幼儿选择性信任的影响. 心理学报, 51(1), 71-84.
[7] 王旭红(2019). 4-6岁幼儿的文字意识发展对不同类型信息信任及运用的影响. 硕士学位论文, 金华: 浙江师范大学.
[8] 魏艳苹(2022). 幼儿选择性信任的现状及干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 南昌: 江西科技师范大学.
[9] 杨慕(1979). 浅谈词语解释. 青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1(2), 32-40.
[10] 袁鸣, 邓铸, 季培(2013). 儿童社会认识论: 儿童对信息提供者的选择性信任. 心理科学进展, 21(3), 480-486.
[11] 张兰萍, 周晖(2009). 幼儿基于信息判断的选择性信任的发展——其持续性及与人际信任的关系. 心理发展与教育, 25(3), 9-14.
[12] Corriveau, K. H., & Kurkul, K. E. (2014). “Why Does Rain Fall?”: Children Prefer to Learn from an Informant Who Uses Noncircular Explanations. Child Development, 85, 1827-1835.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Corriveau, K. H., Einav, S., Robinson, E. J., & Harris, P. L. (2014). To the Letter: Early Readers Trust Print-Based over Oral Instructions to Guide Their Actions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32, 345-358.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Corriveau, K. H., Fusaro, M., & Harris, P. L. (2009). Going with the Flow: Preschoolers Prefer Non-Dissenters as Informants. Psychological Science, 20, 372-377.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Corriveau, K., & Harris, P. L. (2010). Young Children’s Trust in What Other People Say. In K. J. Rotenberg, (Ed.), Interpersonal Trust during Childhood and Adolescence (pp. 87-109). Cambridge University Press.[CrossRef
[16] Crivello, C., Grossman, S., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2021). Specifying Links between Infants’ Theory of Mind, Associative Learning, and Selective Trust. Infancy, 26, 664-685.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Danovitch, J. H., & Alzahabi, R. (2013). Children Show Selective Trust in Technological Informants. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14, 499-513.[CrossRef
[18] Dio, C. D., Manzi, F., Peretti, G. et al. (2019) Shall I Trust You? From Child Human-Robot Interaction to Trusting Relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 469.
[19] Einav, S., Robinson, E. J., & Fox, A. (2013). Take It as Read: Origins of Trust in Knowledge Gained from Print. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 262-274.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Eisen, S., & Lillard, A. S. (2016). Just Google It: Young Children’s Preferences for Touchscreens versus Books in Hypothetical Learning Tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1431.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Eyden, J., Robinson, E. J., & Einav, S. (2014). Children’s Trust in Unexpected Oral versus Printed Suggestions: Limitations of the Power of Print. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32, 430-439.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Gaither, S. E., Chen, E. E., Corriveau, K. H., Harris, P. L., Ambady, N., & Sommers, S. R. (2014). Monoracial and Biracial Children: Effects of Racial Identity Saliency on Social Learning and Social Preferences. Child Development, 85, 2299-2316.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L. (2005). Preschoolers Mistrust Ignorant and Inaccurate Speakers. Child Development, 76, 1261-1277.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Lutz, D. J., & Keil, F. C. (2002). Early Understanding of the Division of Cognitive Labor. Child Development, 73, 1073-1084.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Palmquist, C. M., Floersheimer, A., Crum, K., & Ruggiero, J. (2022). Social Cognition and Trust: Exploring the Role of Theory of Mind and Hostile Attribution Bias in Children’s Skepticism of Inaccurate Informants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 215, Article ID: 105341.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Mercier, H., Sudo, M., Castelain, T., Bernard, S., & Matsui, T. (2018). Japanese Preschoolers’ Evaluation of Circular and Non-Circular Arguments. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 493-505.[CrossRef
[27] Sabbagh, M. A., & Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Learning Words from Knowledgeable versus Ignorant Speakers: Links between Preschoolers’ Theory of Mind and Semantic Development. Child Development, 72, 1054-1070.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Sabbagh, M. A., Wdowiak, S. D., & Ottaway, J. M. (2003). Do Word Learners Ignore Ignorant Speakers? Journal of Child Language, 30, 905-924.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Tippenhauer, N., Sun, Y., Jimenez, S. R., Green, M., & Saylor, M. M. (2020). Developmental Differences in Preschoolers’ Definition Assessment and Production. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 199, Article ID: 104925.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Tong, Y., Danovitch, J., Wang, F., Williams, A., & Li, H. (2021). Unsafe to Eat? How Familiar Cartoon Characters Affect Children’s Learning about Potentially Harmful Foods. Appetite, 167, Article ID: 105649.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Wu, Y., Danovitch, J. H., & Wang, F. (2024). “Who Said” versus “What Was Said”: Selective Trust in Teachers and Books. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 95, Article ID: 101709.[CrossRef