养老机构激励型监管的法律问题研究
Research on Legal Issues of Incentive-Based Regulation in Elderly Care Institutions
DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2026.143080, PDF,   
作者: 张炜祎:武汉工程大学法商学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 养老机构激励型监管法律规制Elderly Care Institutions Incentive Supervision Legal Regulation
摘要: 养老机构激励型监管是监管方式的重大革新,通过引导、激励的方式实现养老机构的正向监管,增强监管实效,聚焦创新驱动,护航高质量发展,以质促兴,以新致远。与传统的“命令–控制”监管相比,其更具有自主性和开放性,强制性则有所减弱。当前,我国已在税收减免、建设补贴、运营补贴等领域展开了养老机构激励型监管实践,但囿于养老机构传统的“命令–控制”监管的制约,而养老机构激励型监管尚未完全法治化,导致养老机构激励型监管没有充分发挥其实效。基于此,应当对养老机构激励型监管进行系统的法治构建,以整理治理为导向,细化监管责任,推动协同治理,注重监管实效、设置程序、明确法律责任与救济机制,遵循和贯彻行政法治原则、信赖保护原则、正当程序原则,确保养老机构激励型监管的有效实施。
Abstract: Incentive regulation for elderly care institutions represents a major innovation in regulatory approaches. By adopting guidance and incentive mechanisms, it achieves positive regulation of elderly care institutions, enhances regulatory effectiveness, focuses on innovation-driven development, safeguards high-quality development, promotes prosperity through quality, and achieves long-term development through innovation. Compared with the traditional “command-and-control” regulation, it is more autonomous and open, with reduced mandatory force. At present, China has carried out practices of incentive-based regulation for elderly care institutions in such areas as tax reductions and exemptions, construction subsidies, and operation subsidies. However, constrained by the traditional “command-and-control” regulation of elderly care institutions and the incomplete legalization of incentive-based regulation for elderly care institutions, such regulation has not yet given full play to its effectiveness. Accordingly, it is necessary to conduct a systematic legal construction of incentive-based regulation for elderly care institutions. Guided by holistic governance, efforts should be made to clarify regulatory responsibilities, promote collaborative governance, emphasize regulatory effectiveness, establish procedural rules, define legal liabilities and remedy mechanisms, and abide by and implement the principles of administrative legality, protection of legitimate expectations, and due process, so as to ensure the effective implementation of incentive-based regulation for elderly care institutions.
文章引用:张炜祎. 养老机构激励型监管的法律问题研究[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(3): 163-168. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.143080

参考文献

[1] 李沫. 激励型监管的行政法思考[J]. 政治与法律, 2009(10): 86-91.
[2] 张翔. “合宪性审查时代”的宪法学: 基础与前瞻[J]. 环球法律评论, 2019, 41(2): 5-21.
[3] 罗豪才, 宋功德. 认真对待软法——公域软法的一般理论及其中国实践[J]. 中国法学, 2006(2): 3-24.
[4] 林来梵. 《宪法学讲义》(第三版) [M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2018.
[5] 范进学, 马冲冲. 论我国养老服务立法亟待解决的十大问题[J]. 南通大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 41(1): 100-116, 160.
[6] 王显勇, 杜宜. 民营养老服务机构经营之法律规制[J]. 社会科学战线, 2025(1): 215-225.
[7] 袁文全, 程海玲. 养老机构发展的法律规制: 理论基础与法制完善[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 39(5): 193-203, 243.
[8] 董淳锷. 法律实施激励机制的基本原理及立法构造[J]. 社会科学文摘, 2024(3): 118-120.