基于AIS数据的东北亚货运港口航运网络复杂性分析
Complexity Analysis of Northeast Asian Freight Port and Shipping Network Based on AIS Data
DOI: 10.12677/sd.2026.163115, PDF,   
作者: 杨振宇:辽宁师范大学地理科学学院,辽宁 大连;张 翔*:大连市国土空间规划设计有限公司,辽宁 大连
关键词: AIS港口航运网络复杂网络社区结构核心–边缘鲁棒性AIS Port and Shipping Network Complex Network Community Structure Core-Periphery Robustness
摘要: 本文通过复杂网络理论与社区结构分析相结合的方法,以港口为节点构建东北亚货运航运网络,通过研究网络整体拓扑特征、节点中心性指标及社区划分结果,揭示东北亚海上贸易网络的空间格局及其沿线港口分布特征。该网络整体呈现“核心–支线”层级结构,度分布呈现显著长尾特征,尾部更符合受容量约束的重尾过程而非严格幂律分布,具有无标度倾向与典型“小世界”特性;同时,从节点中心性角度分析,东北亚沿线港口呈现明显的区域集聚与功能分化,其中上海港、宁波舟山港、釜山港、大连港及天津新港中心性值最高,构成网络的多功能核心枢纽;社区划分显示清晰的地理–功能模块化格局,主要分为中国东部沿海群、中国珠三角–南海群、日本港口群、韩国港口群,跨社区连接高度依赖少数桥梁节点。基于上述结构事实,东北亚海上贸易网络的优化与韧性提升应重点关注以中国东部沿海核心港群(上海–宁波舟山)为主导、联动韩国釜山及日本关西–关东港群的多核心协同格局,同时将重心置于跨板块通道冗余与替代连接能力的增强、以及区域内中小港口集疏运与服务能力的补齐,从而在维持高效联通的同时降低对少数关键枢纽与桥梁节点的结构性依赖并提升系统抗风险能力。
Abstract: This study integrates complex network theory with community-structure analysis to construct a Northeast Asian freight port and shipping network, in which ports are represented as nodes and inter-port connections are inferred from observed shipping linkages. By examining global topological properties, node-level centrality metrics, and community partitions, we characterize the spatial organization of the Northeast Asian maritime trade network and the distributional patterns of ports along major shipping corridors. The resulting network exhibits a pronounced “core-feeder” hierarchical architecture. Its degree distribution is strongly right-skewed with a clear long tail; the tail is more consistent with a capacity-limited heavy-tailed process than with a strict power-law, while still displaying scale-free-like heterogeneity and a canonical small-world structure. Centrality analysis further reveals marked regional clustering and functional differentiation among ports: Shanghai, Ningbo-Zhoushan, Busan, Dalian, and Tianjin Xingang attain the highest centrality values and jointly constitute a set of multifunctional core hubs. Community detection identifies a clear geo-functional modular pattern, broadly separating the network into an East China coastal cluster, a Pearl River Delta-South China coastal cluster, a Japan port cluster, and a Korea port cluster; inter-community connectivity is highly concentrated in a small number of key cross-community connector nodes. Building on these structural findings, efforts to enhance the performance and resilience of the Northeast Asian maritime trade network should prioritize a multi-core coordination configuration anchored by the East China coastal hub system (Shanghai-Ningbo-Zhoushan) and closely coupled with Busan as well as the Kansai-Kanto port systems in Japan. At the same time, emphasis should be placed on strengthening inter-module corridor redundancy and alternative routing capacity, and on improving hinterland access, collection-distribution systems, and service capabilities of small and medium-sized ports, thereby sustaining efficient connectivity while reducing structural dependence on a limited set of critical hubs and connector nodes and ultimately enhancing network-wide robustness to disruptions.
文章引用:杨振宇, 张翔. 基于AIS数据的东北亚货运港口航运网络复杂性分析[J]. 可持续发展, 2026, 16(3): 267-284. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2026.163115

参考文献

[1] 方玉洁. “21世纪海上丝绸之路”干散货贸易网络空间联系格局探究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2022.
[2] Wang, L., Lau, Y., Su, H., Zhu, Y. and Kanrak, M. (2022) Dynamics of the Asian Shipping Network in Adjacent Ports: Comparative Case Studies of Shanghai-Ningbo and Hong Kong-Shenzhen. Ocean & Coastal Management, 221, Article ID: 106127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Xu, M., Pan, Q., Muscoloni, A., Xia, H. and Cannistraci, C.V. (2020) Modular Gateway-Ness Connectivity and Structural Core Organization in Maritime Network Science. Nature Communications, 11, Article No. 2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Faure, M. and Ducruet, C. (2025) The Blue Connection. A Systematic and Critical Review of Shipping Network Research. Networks and Spatial Economics. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Li, Z., Li, H., Zhang, Q. and Qi, X. (2024) Data-Driven Research on the Impact of COVID-19 on the Global Container Shipping Network. Ocean & Coastal Management, 248, Article ID: 106969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Jarumaneeroj, P., Barnett Lawton, J. and Svindland, M. (2023) An Evolution of the Global Container Shipping Network: Port Connectivity and Trading Community Structure (2011-2017). Maritime Economics & Logistics, 26, 283-306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Latora, V. and Marchiori, M. (2001) Efficient Behavior of Small-World Networks. Physical Review Letters, 87, Article ID: 198701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 郭建科, 梁木新. 中国与“21世纪海上丝绸之路”沿线国家航运网络及经贸联系的耦合特征[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(6): 1531-1545.
[9] 刘婵娟, 胡志华. “21世纪海上丝绸之路”海运网络空间格局及其复杂性研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2018, 27(3): 11-18.
[10] 马昊, 贾大山, 朱吉双. 基于AIS数据的港口船舶服务效率智能测算方法[J]. 中国航海, 2023, 46(2): 99-105.
[11] 宗康, 胡志华. 基于复杂网络的海运航线网络连通性分析[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2017, 43(1): 79-84.
[12] Filipiak, D., Węcel, K., Stróżyna, M., Michalak, M. and Abramowicz, W. (2020) Extracting Maritime Traffic Networks from AIS Data Using Evolutionary Algorithm. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62, 435-450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Kaluza, P., Kölzsch, A., Gastner, M.T. and Blasius, B. (2010) The Complex Network of Global Cargo Ship Movements. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 7, 1093-1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 陈正勇, 丁文涛, 黄俊. 基于AIS数据的集装箱港口枢纽度研究[J]. 海洋工程, 2025, 43(5): 177-185.
[15] 杜超, 王姣娥, 莫辉辉. 中国集装箱航运网络空间格局及复杂性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(2): 190-198.
[16] (2026) Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data. SIAM Review.
[17] 郭建科, 梁木新. 中国-“海上丝路”沿线国家港口航运网络变化[J]. 海洋经济, 2023, 13(4): 29-39.
[18] 郭建科, 何瑶, 侯雅洁. 中国沿海集装箱港口航运网络空间联系及区域差异[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(11): 1499-1509.
[19] Watts, D.J. and Strogatz, S.H. (1998) Collective Dynamics of “Small-World” Networks. Nature, 393, 440-442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 吴迪, 王诺, 吴暖, 等. 主航道中断背景下集装箱海运网络的脆弱性及其对中国的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(4): 719-730.
[21] 陈芙英, 胡志华. 海上丝绸之路东南亚航运网络空间格局研究[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2016, 42(4): 91-96+104.
[22] 何瑶, 杨永春, 郭建科. 中断模拟下的中国沿海集装箱港口航运网络脆弱性[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(2): 414-424.
[23] 王列辉, 叶斐, 郑渊博. 中美集装箱航运网络格局演化与脆弱性评估[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(5): 136-144.
[24] Chattopadhyay, S., Das, A.K. and Ghosh, K. (2019) Finding Patterns in the Degree Distribution of Real-World Complex Networks: Going Beyond Power Law. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 23, 913-932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Viljoen, N.M. and Joubert, J.W. (2016) The Vulnerability of the Global Container Shipping Network to Targeted Link Disruption. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 462, 396-409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] 关晓光, 李振福, 丁超君, 等. 世界集装箱港口复杂网络级联失效下的鲁棒性分析[J]. 中国航海, 2021, 44(2): 84-89.
[27] 周漩, 张凤鸣, 周卫平, 等. 利用节点效率评估复杂网络功能鲁棒性[J]. 物理学报, 2012, 61(19): 1-7.