自贡市极端大风过程特征分析
Analysis of Characteristics of Extreme Gale Processes in Zigong
DOI: 10.12677/ccrl.2026.152052, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 喻琴昆*, 吕用洋, 程乔曦:自贡市气象局,四川 自贡;雷逸萌:内江市气象局,四川 内江;周燕秋#:铜梁区气象局,重庆
关键词: 极端大风环境条件雷达特征监测指标Extreme Gale Environmental Condition Radar Characteristic Monitoring Indicator
摘要: 本文对自贡地区2018~2023年发生的15次9级以上对流性大风过程进行分析,探究其发生时间特征、环境条件、雷达回波及地面要素特征,结果表明:① 自贡发生9级以上对流性大风分为混合性大风和雷暴大风两类,其中混合性大风高发于春末夏初,雷暴大风高发于盛夏,且以16时和21时为峰值时段;② 物理环境方面,低层和中高层喇叭口状层结是有利层结结构,且Shr500 hPa与对流有效位能(Convective Available Potential Energy, CAPE)呈一定负相关,Pearson相关系数−0.46;③ 雷达回波形态以非线性对流系统为主(29%),且大多回波强度 ≥ 65 dBZ,短临监测上中层径向辐合(MARC)、低层辐散、低空急流、阵风锋及垂直液态含水量(Vertically Integrated Liquid, VIL)突降为关键监测指标;④ 过程普遍伴随气温骤降、气压涌升及5分钟雨量 ≥ 7 mm的短时强降水。
Abstract: This paper analyzes 15 convective gale processes of magnitude 9 and above that occurred in Zigong from 2018 to 2023, exploring their temporal characteristics, environmental conditions, radar echo features and surface element characteristics. The results show that: ① The convective gales of magnitude 9 and above in Zigong are divided into two categories, namely mixed gales and thunderstorm gales. Mixed gales occur frequently in late spring and early summer, while thunderstorm gales are prevalent in midsummer, with peak hours at 16:00 and 21:00 local time. ② In terms of physical environment, the trumpet-shaped stratification in the lower and middle-upper troposphere is a favorable stratification structure. Moreover, there is a negative correlation between the vertical wind shear at 500 hPa (Shr500 hPa) and Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE), with a Pearson correlation coefficient of −0.46. ③ The radar echo morphology is dominated by nonlinear convective systems (accounting for 29%), and most of the echo intensities are ≥65 dBZ. For short-range monitoring, mid-altitude radial convergence (MARC), low-level divergence, low-level jet, gust front and sudden drop in Vertically Integrated Liquid (VIL) are the key monitoring indicators. ④ These processes are generally accompanied by abrupt temperature drop, pressure surge and 5-minute rainfall ≥ 7 mm.
文章引用:喻琴昆, 吕用洋, 程乔曦, 雷逸萌, 周燕秋. 自贡市极端大风过程特征分析[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2026, 15(2): 472-482. https://doi.org/10.12677/ccrl.2026.152052

参考文献

[1] 胡宜昌, 董文杰, 何勇. 21世纪初极端天气气候事件研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(10): 1067-1075.
[2] 王秀明, 俞小鼎, 周小刚, 等. “6.3”区域致灾雷暴大风形成及维持原因分析[J]. 高原气象, 2012, 31(2): 504-514.
[3] 梁建宇, 孙建华. 2009年6月一次飑线过程灾害性大风的形成机制[J]. 大气科学, 2012, 36(2): 316-336.
[4] 费海燕, 王秀明, 周小刚, 等. 中国强雷暴大风的气候特征和环境参数分析[J]. 气象, 2016, 42(12): 1513-1521.
[5] 许霖, 姚蓉, 王晓雷, 等. 湖南省雷暴大风的时空分布和变化特征[J]. 高原气象, 2017, 36(4): 993-1000.
[6] 张雪晨, 朱珠, 刘高平. 安徽省近40年雷暴大风气候变化特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(12): 1621-1626.
[7] 孙虎林, 罗亚丽, 张人禾, 等. 2009年6月3-4日黄淮地区强飑线成熟阶段特征分析[J]. 大气科学, 2011, 35(1): 105-120.
[8] 于庚康, 吴海英, 曾明剑, 等. 江苏地区两次强飑线天气过程的特征分析[J]. 大气科学学报, 2013, 36(1): 47-59.
[9] 郑媛媛, 张雪晨, 朱红芳, 等. 东北冷涡对江淮飑线生成的影响研究[J]. 高原气象, 2014, 33(1): 261-269.
[10] 郭弘, 林永辉, 周淼, 等. 华南暖区暴雨中一次飑线的中尺度分析[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2014, 33(2): 171-180.
[11] 支树林, 许爱华, 张娟娟, 等. 一次影响江西的致灾性飑线天气成因分析[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2015, 34(4): 352-359.
[12] 李国翠, 刘黎平, 连志鸾, 等. 利用雷达回波三维拼图资料识别雷暴大风统计研究[J]. 气象学报, 2014, 72(1): 168-181.
[13] 东高红, 吴涛. 垂直积分液态水含量在地面大风预报中的应用[J]. 气象科技, 2007, 35(6): 877-881.