成渝地区双城经济圈区域协同发展测度及时空分异研究
Study on the Measurement and Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Regional Coordinated Development in the Chengdu-Chongqing Twin-City Economic Circle
摘要: 成渝地区双城经济圈是我国重要城市群，具备成为中国经济增长重要增长极的潜力，但发展中仍有不少问题需要正视，其经济总量、一体化水平与成熟城市群存在较大差距，且内部城乡发展格局兼具城市集聚优势与乡村资源禀赋特征，发展不平衡现象突出。针对这些情况，本文构建了经济、社会、生态环境三维综合指标体系，定量测度该经济圈不同年份综合发展水平并开展聚类分析，将16个地级市划分为四个梯队，同时探究区域系统耦合协调性及影响因素。研究发现，“四个梯队”与“四大分区”围绕双核城市有序发展，各组别协同发展影响因素差异显著：双核城市经济与社会发展基本协同但与生态环境矛盾突出，邻成组等组别存在社会发展与环境质量不协调、区域差异大等问题，邻渝组发展处于末端，人文交通水平滞后、公共基础设施与服务短板突出等问题亟待弥补。
Abstract: The Chengdu-Chongqing twin-city economic circle is an important urban agglomeration in China with the potential to become a significant growth pole for the country’s economy. However, there are still many issues that need to be addressed in its development. Its overall economic scale and level of integration lag significantly behind those of mature urban agglomerations, and its internal urban-rural development pattern combines the advantages of urban agglomeration with the resource endowment characteristics of rural areas, resulting in pronounced development imbalances. In response to these situations, this paper constructs a three-dimensional comprehensive indicator system covering the economy, society, and ecological environment, quantitatively measures the comprehensive development level of the economic circle in different years, and conducts cluster analysis, dividing the 16 prefecture-level cities into four tiers. At the same time, it explores the regional system’s coupling coordination and influencing factors. The study finds that the “four tiers” and “four major zones” develop in an orderly manner around the dual-core cities, and the influencing factors for coordinated development differ significantly among the groups: the economy and social development of the dual-core cities are basically coordinated but have prominent conflicts with the ecological environment; groups such as the neighboring Chengdu group face issues such as uncoordinated social development and environmental quality, as well as large regional disparities; the neighboring Chongqing group is at the lower end of development, with backward levels of human and transport infrastructure, and significant shortcomings in public infrastructure and services that need urgent attention.
文章引用：璩路路, 李茂英. 成渝地区双城经济圈区域协同发展测度及时空分异研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(3): 663-673. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.153272

参考文献

[1] 杨陈静, 刘航. 自贸区协同发展的研究综述[J]. 四川行政学院学报, 2019(2): 89-98.
[2] Abramowitz, M. (1979) Rapid Growth Potential and Its Realization: The Experience of Capitalist Economies in the Postwar Period. Economic Growth and Resources, 1, 1-30.
[3] Baumol, W.J. (1986) Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the Long-Run Data Show. American Economic Review, 76, 1072-1085.
[4] Dowrick, S. and Nguyen, D.T. (1989) OECD Comparative Economic Growth 1950-1985: Catch-Up and Convergence. American Economic Review, 79, 1010-1030.
[5] Bemard, A.B. and Jones, C.I. (2001) Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement across Industries and Countries. American Economic Review, 85, 1216-1238.
[6] Higón, D.A., et al. (2017) The Impact of the Great Recession on TFP Convergence among EU Countries. Applied Economics Letters, 25, 393-396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] 张建华, 何宇, 陈珍珍. 长江经济带城市协同发展水平测度[J]. 城市问题, 2019(3): 60-66.
[8] 吴志才, 张凌媛, 黄诗卉. 粤港澳大湾区旅游经济联系的空间结构及协同合作模式[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(6): 1370-1385.
[9] 方创琳. 京津冀城市群协同发展的理论基础与规律性分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(1): 15-24.
[10] 周密, 孙哲. 京津冀区域吸收能力的测算和空间协同研究[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(8): 31-39.
[11] 周春山, 邓鸿鹄, 史晨怡. 粤港澳大湾区协同发展特征及机制[J]. 规划师, 2018, 34(4): 5-12.
[12] 魏丽华. 论城市群经济联系对区域协同发展的影响——基于京津冀与沪苏浙的比较[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(4): 575-579.
[13] 刘秀杰, 万成伟, 叶裕民. 京津冀协同发展的制度困境与对策建议——以通州与北三县协同发展为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2019, 26(11): 5-10.
[14] 张欢, 汤尚颖, 耿志润. 长三角城市群宜业与生态宜居融合协同发展水平、动态轨迹及其收敛性[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(2): 3-23.
[15] 郑玉雯, 薛伟贤. 丝绸之路经济带沿线国家协同发展的驱动因素——基于哈肯模型的分阶段研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2019(2): 78-92.
[16] 李琳, 刘莹. 中国区域经济协同发展的驱动因素——基于哈肯模型的分阶段实证研究[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(9): 1603-1616.
[17] 李琳, 戴姣兰. 中三角城市群协同创新驱动因素研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2016(23): 119-123.
[18] 杜霞, 孟彦如, 方创琳, 李聪. 山东半岛城市群城镇化与生态环境耦合协调发展的时空格局[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(16): 5546-5559.
[19] 白志礼, 谭江蓉. 基于竞争、协同、共生、互赢机制的川渝经济合作与发展探析[J]. 软科学, 2007(4): 75-78, 82.
[20] 王崇举. 对成渝经济区产业协同的思考[J]. 重庆工商大学学报(西部论坛), 2008(2): 1-5.
[21] 锁利铭, 位韦, 廖臻. 区域协调发展战略下成渝城市群跨域合作的政策、机制与路径[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2008(5): 90-96.
[22] 李月起. 新时代成渝城市群协调发展策略研究[J]. 西部论坛, 2018, 28(3): 94-99.
[23] 田莎莎, 季闯. 成渝城市群经济协调发展的路径研究[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2018, 15(4): 25-27.
[24] 郭宏, 伏虎. 贸易流通、知识溢出与区域协同创新——基于川渝互动发展的视角[J]. 商业经济研究, 2016(9): 103-105.
[25] 黄寰, 况嘉欣, 张秋凤, 等. 成渝地区双城经济圈的协同创新发展能力研究[J]. 技术经济, 2021, 40(6): 31-38.
[26] 叶文辉, 伍运春. 成渝城市群空间集聚效应、溢出效应和协同发展研究[J]. 财经问题研究, 2019(9): 88-94.
[27] 张满银, 全荣. 京津冀区域协同发展评估[J]. 统计与决策, 2020(4): 72-76.
[28] 杨帆, 于娱. 长三角区域产业结构升级与技术创新间代偿关系分析[J]. 江苏科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2022(2): 94-100.
[29] 陶永宏, 娄伟伟, 吴洁. 泛长三角地区国家级高新区运行效率测度与评价[J]. 江苏科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(1): 68-74.
[30] 马艳梅, 吴玉鸣, 吴柏钧. 长三角地区城镇化可持续发展综合评价——基于熵值法和象限图法[J]. 经济地理, 2015(6): 47-53.
[31] 田泽, 景晓栋, 肖钦文. 长江经济带碳排放产业结构区域创新耦合度及时空演化[J]. 华东经济管理, 2020(2): 10-17.
[32] 姜磊, 柏玲, 吴玉鸣. 中国省域经济、资源与环境协调分析——兼论三系统耦合公式及其扩展形式[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017(5): 788-799.
[33] 刘法威, 许恒周, 王姝. 人口土地经济城镇化的时空耦合协调性分析——基于中国省际面板数据的实证研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2014(8): 7-11.
[34] 张卫国, 黄晓兰, 郑月龙. 包容性城镇化与产业结构的协调发展评价[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2016(2): 28-34.
[35] 曹玉华, 夏永祥, 毛广雄. 淮河生态经济带区域发展差异及协同发展策略[J]. 经济地理, 2019(9): 213-221.
[36] Lv, Q. and Wu, Z. (2020) Evaluation of Economic Vitality of Beijing and Analysis of Influencing Factors Based on Entropy Method and Grey Correlation Analysis Model. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 445-453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[37] Ding, H.C., Lian, M.R., Chen, X.Y., et al. (2019) Research on the Correlation of Port Logistics and Regional Economic Growth Base on Gray Relational Analysis Method. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 31, e4744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐