从黑盒到白盒:应用SHAP值对ESG-股价波动关联进行统计稳健性检验与经济学解释
From Black Box to White Box: Statistical Robustness Checks and Economic Interpretation of the ESG-Stock Price Volatility Nexus Using SHAP Values
DOI: 10.12677/sa.2026.153065, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 龙安琪:广西民族大学经济学院,广西 南宁;杨凯迪:山东师范大学商学院,山东 济南;卢美婷:生科寰宇(福建)科技有限公司,福建 石狮;张予涵:厦门软件职业技术学院经济管理学院,福建 厦门;王 焦:国家能源集团包神铁路集团,内蒙古 包头;沈伟钦*:闽南理工学院经济管理学院,福建 泉州;高 谨*:长安大学经济与管理学院,陕西 西安
关键词: ESG表现股价波动尾部风险公司治理XGBoostTreeSHAPESG Performance Stock Price Volatility Tail Risk Corporate Governance XGBoost TreeSHAP
摘要: 在ESG投资理念深度融入中国资本市场的背景下,现有研究多聚焦ESG的收益效应,对其风险防控功能,尤其是极端尾部风险的影响研究存在不足,且普遍依赖线性模型,存在设定偏误。本文以2018~2024年沪深300指数成分股为研究样本,构建Kur全矩振幅值综合捕捉股价常规波动与极端尾部风险,采用双向固定效应模型、工具变量法系统检验ESG表现对股价全矩波动的因果性影响,并通过XGBoost非线性模型与TreeSHAP方法实现“从黑盒到白盒”的无偏拆解。研究发现:ESG表现对股价全矩波动具有显著的抑制效应,公司治理维度是核心驱动因子;二者呈U型非线性关系,存在明确的作用拐点,该效应在国有企业、制造业企业与市场下行区间更为突出;非线性模型的拟合精度与泛化能力显著优于线性基准模型,白盒拆解明确了信息披露质量、董事会独立性等核心细分指标,验证了治理与环境维度的正向协同效应。本文拓展了ESG与资本市场稳定的相关研究,为监管层完善ESG制度建设、上市公司优化ESG治理、投资者构建风险防控体系提供了经验证据。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the deep integration of ESG investment principles into China’s capital market, existing literature has largely focused on the return implications of ESG, while paying insufficient attention to its risk-mitigation role, especially its impact on extreme tail risk. Furthermore, most prior studies rely on linear models, which are subject to inherent model misspecification. This paper uses a sample of constituents of the CSI 300 Index from 2018 to 2024, and constructs the Kur full-moment amplitude indicator to comprehensively capture both conventional stock price volatility and extreme tail risk. We employ a two-way fixed effects (TWFE) model and instrumental variable (IV) approach to systematically examine the causal effect of ESG performance on stock price full-moment volatility, and implement an unbiased “from black box to white box” decomposition via the XGBoost nonlinear model and TreeSHAP method. The main findings are as follows: First, ESG performance exerts a significant inhibitory effect on stock price full-moment volatility, with the corporate governance (G) dimension serving as the core driving factor. Second, the relationship between ESG performance and stock price volatility presents a significant U-shaped nonlinear pattern with a clear inflection point, and this inhibitory effect is more pronounced for state-owned enterprises (SOEs), manufacturing firms, and bear market periods. Third, the nonlinear model significantly outperforms the linear benchmark model in terms of fitting accuracy and out-of-sample generalization ability. The white-box decomposition identifies core sub-indicators including information disclosure quality and board independence, and verifies a significant positive synergy between the governance and environmental dimensions. This study extends the literature on ESG and capital market stability, and provides empirical evidence for regulators to improve ESG institutional frameworks, listed firms to optimize ESG governance, and investors to establish robust risk management systems.
文章引用:龙安琪, 杨凯迪, 卢美婷, 张予涵, 王焦, 沈伟钦, 高谨. 从黑盒到白盒:应用SHAP值对ESG-股价波动关联进行统计稳健性检验与经济学解释[J]. 统计学与应用, 2026, 15(3): 165-182. https://doi.org/10.12677/sa.2026.153065

参考文献

[1] Feng, P., Pang, J. and Xu, L. (2026) The Impact of ESG Rating Divergence on Stock Price Delays: Evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 33, 136-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Salem, R., Ghazwani, M. and Alshaer, W. (2025) ESG Performance-Stock Price Volatility Nexus: The Moderating Effect of Board Cultural Diversity in G20 Markets. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34, 8172-8193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Zhang, Y., Yu, J., Wang, J. and Song, Y. (2026) Blockchain Technology, Information Asymmetry and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 155, Article 109150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Wang, D., Hu, Y., Yang, L. and Li, Y. (2026) The Equilibrium Dilemma: ESG Structural Imbalance and Corporate Green Innovation. Economic Analysis and Policy, 90, 504-534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Mormile, S., Piscopo, G. and Adinolfi, P. (2026) Leveraging Unique Resources and Capabilities to Address ESG Challenges: A Qualitative Study of High-Growth Italian Start-Ups. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 17, 151-178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Zhang, Z. and Qian, J. (2018) Test Suite Augmentation via Integrating Black-and White-Box Testing Techniques. International Journal of Performability Engineering, 14, 1324-1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Kong, L., Suganthan, P.N., Snášel, V., Ojha, V. and Pan, J. (2026) Enhancing Sampling Performance in XGBoost by Ensemble Feature Engineering. Pattern Recognition, 176, Article 113169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Kumar, S. and Sharma, D. (2026) Unveiling Risk-Return Dynamics: Volatility Persistence and Leverage Effects in the Indian Banking Sector through Symmetric and Asymmetric GARCH Models. IIM Ranchi journal of management studies, 5, 83-108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Vahdatian, P., Latifi, M. and Ahsan, M. (2025) Designing Trustworthy Recommender Systems: A Glass-Box, Interpretable, and Auditable Approach. Electronics, 14, Article 4890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 王越, 阳镇, 陈劲. 政府绿色发展注意力会改善企业ESG表现吗? [J/OL]. 管理工程学报, 1-15. 2026-02-22.[CrossRef
[11] 张一帆. 化工企业ESG评级问题探讨及应对措施[J]. 精细与专用化学品, 2026, 34(1): 1-4+8.
[12] 向奕宣. 中国储运企业ESG实践中的行业挑战与对策[J]. 中国储运, 2025(11): 146.
[13] 王海山, 王圣元. 中国建筑业企业ESG管理实践研究: 信息披露现状、问题识别与路径优化[J]. 工程管理学报, 2025, 39(5): 7-13.
[14] 徐肖逍. 互联网大厂的ESG报告记录了哪些反腐数据? [N]. 每日经济新闻, 2025-09-08(005).
[15] 肖红军. 对ESG批判的批判、反省与超越[J]. 经济管理, 2025, 47(7): 183-208.
[16] 韩梅. ESG驱动下高新技术企业绿色生产转型的路径[J]. 大众投资指南, 2025(20): 48-50.
[17] 张博扬. 金融租赁公司ESG风险管理策略探究[J]. 环渤海经济瞭望, 2025(4): 46-48.
[18] 李肖夏, 石睿, 徐丽婕. 基于Delphi-AHP的中国汽车产业ESG评价体系研究[J]. 汽车工业研究, 2025(1): 35-40.