云南营盘山地区岩溶水文地质特征分析
Analysis of Karst Hydrogeological Characteristics in the Yingpanshan Area, Yunnan Province
摘要: 本文通过对云南营盘山地区岩溶发育特征、岩溶水文地质条件及岩溶水系统的研究揭示了营盘山地区的岩溶分布特征、发育形态及其发展规律。研究显示研究区岩溶发育受地层岩性、地质构造、地形地貌和地表水系等因素的显著控制,具有顺层性、不均匀性和垂向分带性的特点。研究区地下水主要为孔隙水、裂隙水和岩溶水,其中以岩溶水为主。地下水主要由大气降水和地表水补给,整体上地下水在背斜北西侧及核部接受补给,向两翼及南东倾伏端径流、汇集,分别以马过河、新庄河为当地排泄基准。研究区划分为四个一级岩溶水系统:永宁坪岩溶水系统、新庄河岩溶水系统、营盘山复式背斜岩溶水系统和马过河岩溶水系统。本文为后续开展岩溶水文地质分析奠定了坚实的数据基础,为铁路工程的设计和施工提供科学依据,确保工程的安全性和经济性,同时促进沿线地区的经济社会发展。
Abstract: In this paper, we analyzed the karst development characteristics, karst hydrogeological conditions and karst water systems in the Yingpanshan area of Yunnan Province, to reveal the karst distribution features, development forms and evolution laws in the Yingpanshan area. Research shows that the karst development in the study area is significantly controlled by factors, such as stratum lithology, geological structure, topography and geomorphology, and surface water systems, and it has the characteristics of bedding, non-uniformity and vertical zonation. The groundwater in the study area mainly consists of pore water, fracture water and karst water, with karst water being the dominant type. Groundwater is mainly replenished by atmospheric precipitation and surface water. Generally, groundwater is replenished in the northwestern flank and core of the anticline, and flows and converges towards the two wings and the southeastern dip end, with Ma Guo River and Xin Zhuang River as the local discharge benchmarks. The study area has been divided into four primary karst water systems: the Yongningping Karst Water System (I), the Xinzhong River Karst Water System (II), the Yingpanshan Complex Anticline Karst Water System (III), and the Maguo River Karst Water System (IV). This paper lays a solid data foundation for subsequent karst hydrogeological analysis, provides a scientific basis for the design and construction of railway projects, ensures the safety and economy of the projects, and promotes the economic and social development.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
蒙彦, 雷明堂. 岩溶区隧道涌水研究现状及建议[J]. 中国岩溶, 2003, 22(4): 287-292.
|
|
[2]
|
吴朝钢, 吴国斌, 刘伟, 等. 云桂铁路营盘山隧道溶洞综合勘察与评价[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(S1): 141-146.
|
|
[3]
|
马泽骋. 岩溶隧道涌水后长期积水围岩力学性能与稳定性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 石家庄铁道大学, 2023.
|
|
[4]
|
赵旭峰, 陈植华, 周天智. 西南岩溶地区水资源预测评价中流域水文模型应用的特点及展望[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2007(3): 22-26.
|
|
[5]
|
王浩, 陆垂裕, 秦大庸, 等. 地下水数值计算与应用研究进展综述[J]. 地学前缘, 2010, 17(6): 1-12.
|
|
[6]
|
郜现磊. 营盘山隧道涌突水机理分析及涌水量计算[J]. 工程技术研究, 2022, 7(10): 230-232.
|
|
[7]
|
马云. 中-老铁路主要技术方案比选研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2016.
|
|
[8]
|
余世滔. 顾北矿岩溶水文地质特征及疏放性评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2019.
|
|
[9]
|
许卫民. 新疆且末县车尔臣河流域地下水水文地质条件分析[J]. 地下水, 2017, 39(3): 230-231.
|
|
[10]
|
穆鹏飞. 黄陵-彬长矿区地下水赋存规律研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2012.
|
|
[11]
|
杜宇本, 蒋良文. 大瑞铁路大保段主要工程地质问题及地质选线[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2010, 27(4): 23-28.
|
|
[12]
|
林之恒. 高黎贡山隧道动力稳定性及抗减震措施研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2010.
|
|
[13]
|
杨英, 杨文辉. 滇西北地区断陷盆地软土特征及选线原则[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2013, 30(8): 31-36.
|
|
[14]
|
晏长根, 刘彤, 伍法权. 复杂条件下大型地下洞室群的变形稳定性分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 2008, 16(1): 84-88.
|
|
[15]
|
卢婷, 王鹰, 丁文富. 汤郎-易门深大活动断裂对成昆铁路秀宁隧道水文地质条件的影响评价[J]. 铁道建筑, 2019, 59(11): 75-78.
|