论罗森伯格对后现象学技术政治理论的探索
On Robert Rosenberger’s Exploration of Postphenomenological Techno-Political Theory
摘要: 本文旨在系统阐释罗伯特·罗森伯格对后现象学的政治理论化探索。面对后现象学因缺乏规范性维度而遭受“政治哲学维度缺失”的批评,罗森伯格通过“内外兼修”的路径推动其转型:在内部,他将“技术调节”、“技术多元稳定性”及“技术习惯化”等核心概念政治化;在外部,他联合芬伯格的批判建构主义、拉图尔的行动者网络理论与女性主义立场论,为后现象学注入规范性基础与权力分析视野。由此,他构建了以“技术物作为政治斗争场域”为核心的微观技术政治分析框架,并创制了“变更交叉检验法”这一批判性方法论。尽管该思想在规范性融贯性及微观–宏观衔接上存在局限,但它为后现象学介入现实政治批判提供了可行性的方案。
Abstract: This paper aims to systematically elucidate Robert Rosenberger’s political-theoretical exploration of postphenomenology. Confronting the critique of postphenomenology’s “political deficit” due to its lack of a normative dimension, Rosenberger promotes its transformation through a dual strategy of internal refinement and external alliance: internally, he politicizes core concepts such as “technological mediation,” “multistability of technology,” and “technological habituation”; externally, he integrates Andrew Feenberg’s critical constructivism, Bruno Latour’s actor-network theory, and feminist standpoint theory, thereby infusing postphenomenology with a normative foundation and a power-analytical perspective. In doing so, he constructs a micro-techno-political analytical framework centered on the idea of “technological artifacts as sites of political struggle,” and creates the critical methodology of “variational cross-examination.” Although this theoretical approach has limitations in terms of normative coherence and the linkage between micro- and macro-levels of analysis, it provides a feasible pathway for postphenomenology to engage in real-world political critique.
文章引用:李沛源. 论罗森伯格对后现象学技术政治理论的探索[J]. 哲学进展, 2026, 15(4): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2026.154128

参考文献

[1] 刘永谋, 谭泰成. 论当代技术哲学的政治转向[J]. 理论探索, 2021(6): 51-57+67.
[2] 李三虎. 当代技术哲学具体化转向与技术政治哲学解释学[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 38(1): 19-33.
[3] Feenberg, A. (2009) Peter-Paul Verbeek: Review of What Things Do. Human Studies, 32, 225-228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Bantwal Rao, M., Jongerden, J., Lemmens, P. and Ruivenkamp, G. (2015) Technological Mediation and Power: Post-Phenomenology, Critical Theory, and Autonomist Marxism. Philosophy & Technology, 28, 449-474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Reijers, W. and Coeckelbergh, M. (2020) Praxis and Contemporary Philosophy of Technology. In: Reijers, W. and Coeckelbergh, M., Eds., Narrative and Technology Ethics, Springer International Publishing, 25-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Lemmens, P. (2015) Love and Realism. Foundations of Science, 22, 305-310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 王颖斌, 毛建儒. 芬伯格的技术新路及其批判性分析[J]. 科学与社会, 2019, 9(1): 102-114.
[8] 安德鲁·芬伯格. 技术批判理论[M]. 韩连庆, 曹观法, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005: 165.
[9] Rosenberger, R. (2020) “But, That’s Not Phenomenology!”: A Phenomenology of Discriminatory Technologies. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 24, 83-113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 陈凡, 朱春艳. 技术哲学思想史[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2020: 426.
[11] Rosenberger, R. (2017) Callous Objects: Designs against the Homeless. University of Minnesota Press, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Rosenberg, R. and Verbeek, P. (2015) Postphenomenological Investigations Essays on Human-Technology Relations. In: A Field Guide to Postphenomenology, Lexington Books, 28.
[13] Rosenberger, R. (2020) On Variational Cross-Examination: A Method for Postphenomenological Multistability. AI & Society, 38, 2229-2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Rosenberger, R. and Verbeek, P. (2024) DON IHDE: 1934-2024. Journal of Human-Technology Relations, 2, 1-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 菲利普·布瑞, 王楠, 朱雅婷. 技术哲学: 从反思走向建构[J]. 工程研究-跨学科视野中的工程, 2014, 6(2): 129-136.