急性后循环粥样硬化性脑卒中抽吸取栓与支架取栓疗效和安全性比较
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Aspiration and Stent Embolectomy in Acute Posterior Circulation Atherosclerotic Strokes
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1641234, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 高 伟, 郑 伟:山东第一医科大学第二附属医院神经外科,山东 泰安
关键词: 后循环粥样硬化脑卒中抽吸取栓支架取栓Posterior Circulation Atherosclerosis Stroke Aspiration Thrombectomy Stent Thrombectomy
摘要: 目的:比较急性后循环粥样硬化性脑卒中抽吸取栓与支架取栓在疗效及安全性方面的差异。方法:采用回顾性队列研究方法纳入2021年1月至2024年11月因急性后循环粥样硬化性脑卒中在山东第一医科大学第二附属医院接受经皮介入取栓手术治疗的患者105例,其中采用抽吸取栓的患者48例,采用支架取栓的患者57例,收集患者基线资料、既往病史、烟酒暴露史、血管再通情况、穿刺至再通时间、入院NIHSS评分、入院mRS评分、术后90天mRS评分等资料。结果:两组患者入院NIHSS评分、入院mRS评分比较,P > 0.05;抽吸取栓患者术后90天mRS评分低于支架取栓组,P < 0.05;靶血管再通率两组结果比较,P > 0.05,但首次再通率抽吸组高于支架组,P < 0.05;抽吸组穿刺至再通时间短于支架组,P < 0.05。结论:抽吸取栓能在更短的时间内开通靶血管,拥有更高的首次再通率及更短的穿刺至再通时间,且在远期神经功能预后方面优于支架取栓,将抽吸取栓作为急性后循环粥样性脑卒中患者血管内治疗的首选治疗策略可能对患者更有利。
Abstract: Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of aspiration thrombectomy and stent thrombectomy in acute posterior circulation atherosclerotic stroke. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 105 patients with acute posterior circulation atherosclerotic stroke who received percutaneous interventional thrombectomy in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from January 2021 to November 2024, including 48 patients with aspiration thrombectomy and 57 patients with stent thrombectomy. The baseline data, past medical history, exposure history of smoking and drinking, time from puncture to recanalization and other related data were collected, and the related factors of poor prognosis were analyzed by binary Logistic regression. Results: The comparison of NIHSS score and mRS score at admission between the two groups showed P > 0.05. The mRS score at 90 days after embolectomy was lower in the aspiration group than that in the stent group (P < 0.05). The comparison of target vessel recanalization rate between the two groups showed P > 0.05, but the first recanalization rate in the aspiration group was higher than that in the stent group (P < 0.05); The time from puncture to recanalization in the aspiration group was shorter than that in the stent group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Aspiration thrombectomy can open the target vessel in a shorter time, has a higher first recanalization rate and a shorter time from puncture to recanalization, and is superior to stent thrombectomy in long-term neurological prognosis. Aspiration thrombectomy as the preferred treatment strategy for patients with acute posterior circulation atherosclerotic stroke may be more beneficial.
文章引用:高伟, 郑伟. 急性后循环粥样硬化性脑卒中抽吸取栓与支架取栓疗效和安全性比较[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(4): 138-145. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1641234

参考文献

[1] 《中国脑卒中防治报告2021》概要[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2023, 20(11): 783.
[2] Novakovic-White, R., Corona, J.M. and White, J.A. (2021) Posterior Circulation Ischemia in the Endovascular Era. Neurology, 97, S158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 胡航佳, 周轩, 胡发云, 等. 高龄急性缺血性脑卒中病人行支架机械取栓治疗疗效及预后影响因素分析[J]. 实用老年医学, 2021, 35(5): 475.
[4] Liu, X., Dai, Q., Ye, R., Zi, W., Liu, Y., Wang, H., et al. (2020) Endovascular Treatment versus Standard Medical Treatment for Vertebrobasilar Artery Occlusion (BEST): An Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet Neurology, 19, 115-122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Langezaal, L.C.M., van der Hoeven, E.J.R.J., Mont’Alverne, F.J.A., de Carvalho, J.J.F., Lima, F.O., Dippel, D.W.J., et al. (2021) Endovascular Therapy for Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion. New England Journal of Medicine, 384, 1910-1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Jovin, T.G., Li, C., Wu, L., Wu, C., Chen, J., Jiang, C., et al. (2022) Trial of Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion. New England Journal of Medicine, 387, 1373-1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Tao, C., Nogueira, R.G., Zhu, Y., Sun, J., Han, H., Yuan, G., et al. (2022) Trial of Endovascular Treatment of Acute Basilar-Artery Occlusion. New England Journal of Medicine, 387, 1361-1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 耿皓东. 急性后循环大血管闭塞性脑卒中血管内治疗疗效与安全性多中心研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 中国人民解放军陆军军医大学, 2021.
[9] 罗政云, 陈轲, 付航. 导管抽吸取栓与支架取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效比较研究[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志, 2022, 30(1): 58.
[10] 林枫, 冯琛懿, 张鸿运, 等. 机械取栓治疗基底动脉闭塞的首通效应及预后影响因素分析[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2023(10): 991.
[11] Tsang, C.O.A., Cheung, I.H.W., Lau, K.K., Brinjikji, W., Kallmes, D.F. and Krings, T. (2018) Outcomes of Stent Retriever versus Aspiration-First Thrombectomy in Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 39, 2070-2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Lapergue, B., Blanc, R., Costalat, V., Desal, H., Saleme, S., Spelle, L., et al. (2021) Effect of Thrombectomy with Combined Contact Aspiration and Stent Retriever vs Stent Retriever Alone on Revascularization in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion: The ASTER2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 326, 1158-1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 陈俊臣, 曹文英, 罗燕君, 等. 抽吸取栓术与抽吸结合支架取栓术治疗脑前循环栓塞疗效比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 89.
[14] 袁磊, 赵晓玲, 张举孔, 等. 直接抽吸与支架取栓对大脑中动脉闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中患者治疗效果的比较[J]. 精准医学杂志, 2024, 39(6): 535.
[15] Karlsson, A., Jood, K., Björkman-Burtscher, I. and Rentzos, A. (2024) Stent Retriever versus Aspiration Based Thrombectomy: Impact on First Pass Reperfusion, Procedure Time, and Clinical Outcomes in Large Vessel Occlusion. Nationwide Registry Based Cohort Study. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 17, e245-e251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Qin, C., Shang, K., Xu, S., Wang, W., Zhang, Q. and Tian, D. (2018) Efficacy and Safety of Direct Aspiration versus Stent-Retriever for Recanalization in Acute Cerebral Infarction: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine, 97, e12770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Zhang, X., Guo, X., Yi, Y., Cheng, C., Liang, A., Pu, D., et al. (2020) First-Line Contact Aspiration vs Stent Retriever for Proximal Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 29, Article ID: 105374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Guo, X., Xiong, Y., Huang, X., Pan, Z., Kang, X., Chen, C., et al. (2022) Aspiration versus Stent Retriever for Posterior Circulation Stroke: A Meta‐Analysis. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 29, 525-537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Onodera, K., Kurisu, K., Sakurai, J., Wada, H., Takebayashi, S., Kobayashi, T., et al. (2021) A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique for Vertebra-Basilar Occlusion: A Retrospective Comparison to Stent Retriever. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 30, Article ID: 106069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Astrup, J., Siesjö, B.K. and Symon, L. (1981) Thresholds in Cerebral Ischemia—The Ischemic Penumbra. Stroke, 12, 723-725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Feske, S.K. (2021) Ischemic Stroke. The American Journal of Medicine, 134, 1457-1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Vandelanotte, S. and De Meyer, S.F. (2024) Acute Ischemic Stroke Thrombus Composition. Neuroscience, 550, 11-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 梅照军, 陈伟, 钱宇, 等. 血栓成分与脑卒中病因的关系及其对预后的影响[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2021, 20(1): 35.
[24] Jolugbo, P. and Ariëns, R.A.S. (2021) Thrombus Composition and Efficacy of Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke, 52, 1131-1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Fan, Z., Li, F., Chen, H., Zhang, L. and Ji, B. (2022) Aspiration versus Stent Retriever Thrombectomy in Posterior Circulation Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Neurology, 85, 424-436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]