平台型电子商务企业治理机制研究进展与理论整合
Research Progress and Theoretical Integration of Governance Mechanisms in Platform-Based E-Commerce Enterprises
摘要: 随着数字平台经济的快速发展,平台型电子商务企业逐渐兼具企业组织、市场规则制定者与生态协调者等多重角色,其治理问题呈现出跨层级、多主体与动态演化的复杂特征,传统公司治理理论的解释边界受到挑战。本文在系统梳理国内外相关研究的基础上,从公司治理理论、平台治理理论及制度嵌入与监管理论出发,分析平台型电子商务企业治理研究的主要展开路径,并总结现有研究在理论视角分散、治理层级混淆、静态分析偏重以及制度情境嵌入不足等方面的局限。在此基础上,本文构建“三层四维”理论整合框架,将平台治理划分为公司层、平台层与生态层三个嵌套层级,并从权力结构、资源配置、激励安排与监督约束四个维度进行系统分析,同时引入生命周期演化与制度嵌入视角,以解释平台治理机制的阶段性变化与制度适应过程。研究认为,平台治理具有由内部组织治理向市场规制与生态协同延伸的结构性演化特征,整合框架有助于厘清不同理论的适用边界,缓解研究碎片化问题,并为后续实证研究与平台治理实践提供系统化分析工具。
Abstract: With the rapid development of the digital platform economy, platform-based e-commerce enterprises have gradually assumed multiple roles as corporate organizations, market rule-makers, and ecosystem coordinators. Their governance issues therefore exhibit complex characteristics such as multi-level structures, multi-actor interactions, and dynamic evolution, challenging the explanatory boundaries of traditional corporate governance theory. Based on a systematic review of existing domestic and international literature, this paper examines the main research trajectories from the perspectives of corporate governance theory, platform governance theory, and institutional embeddedness and regulatory theory. It identifies several limitations in current studies, including fragmented theoretical perspectives, blurred governance levels, a predominance of static analysis, and insufficient consideration of institutional contexts. To address these gaps, this study proposes an integrated “three-tier, four-dimension” framework, which divides platform governance into three nested levels—corporate level, platform level, and ecosystem level—and analyzes governance mechanisms through four core dimensions: power structure, resource allocation, incentive arrangements, and supervisory constraints. In addition, lifecycle evolution and institutional embeddedness are incorporated to explain the stage-specific transformation and institutional adaptation of governance mechanisms. The study argues that platform governance demonstrates a structural evolution from internal organizational governance toward market regulation and ecosystem coordination. The proposed framework helps clarify the boundaries and complementarities of different theories, alleviates theoretical fragmentation, and provides a systematic analytical tool for future empirical research and governance practices in platform-based e-commerce enterprises.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
周旭明. 施工企业亏损项目的彻查与治理机制研究——基于F公司的实践[J]. 上海企业, 2026(2): 109-111.
|
|
[2]
|
杨国超, 刘绍庆, 潘扬. 企业ESG “漂绿”行为研究: 表现形式、行为动机与治理机制[J/OL]. 外国经济与管理: 1-18. 2026-02-17.[CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
PS, M.S., Goswami, R. and Gopalaswamy, A.K. (2025) Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Financial Distress: Evidence from a Meta-Analytic Perspective. Journal of Management Control, 36, 345-391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
杨守德, 王思蕊, 邓刚. 基于新公司法下国有企业单层治理结构内部监督机制优化研究[J]. 对外经贸, 2026(1): 109-111, 129.
|
|
[5]
|
陈亦新. 企业治理层面财会监督体系的建构与完善策略分析[J]. 现代商业, 2026(2): 168-171.
|
|
[6]
|
范月光. 国有控股股东与员工持股主体的利益协同机制研究——基于浙江混改企业的治理框架重构[J]. 知识经济, 2026(3): 121-124.
|
|
[7]
|
王艺蓓, 赵增艳, 李卉, 等. 治理现代化视阈下国有企业科学规范审计立项机制研究[J]. 中国内部审计, 2026(1): 32-38.
|
|
[8]
|
Ciurel, M. and Dobrescu, R. (2025) Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Sustainable Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Romanian Listed Companies. Sustainability, 18, Article 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
王帅. 数字经济赋能企业治理创新的内在机制与完善路径——评四川大学出版社《数字经济下企业开放式创新的价值共创机制与协同治理研究》[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2025(11): 300.
|
|
[10]
|
许奎, 金同恩, 程婧妍. 企业ESG评级以何影响审计质量: 外部“信息机制”还是内部“治理机制” [J]. 审计研究, 2025(6): 111-123.
|
|
[11]
|
张玉卓: 加快构建中国特色现代企业治理新机制[J]. 中国总会计师, 2025(11): 8.
|