小半径曲线地铁A型车与扣件刚度匹配研究
Study on the Matching of Stiffness between Metro Type A Vehicles and Fasteners in Small Radius Curve Sections
DOI: 10.12677/dsc.2026.152012, PDF,   
作者: 王 启：成都轨道交通产业技术研究院有限公司，四川 成都；付和林*：成都轨道交通集团有限公司，四川 成都
关键词: 地铁；车轨刚度匹配；数值计算；小半径曲线；车辆–轨道耦合动力学；扣件刚度优化；Subway； Vehicle-Track Stiffness Matching； Numerical Calculation； Small-Radius Curves； Vehicle-Track Coupled Dynamics； Fastener Stiffness Optimization
摘要: 本文通过建立地铁车辆–轨道耦合动力学模型，研究了地铁A型车在小半径曲线运行时扣件刚度对轮轨动力相互作用和列车运行品质的影响规律。研究结果表明，合理的扣件刚度能够有效降低轮轨动力相互作用，增大扣件刚度有利于车轨系统的低频稳定性，但会加剧轮轨高频冲击。提出了不同曲线半径下的最优扣件刚度取值：400 m半径曲线建议取30~35 MN/m，600 m半径曲线建议取25~30 MN/m，800 m半径曲线建议取23~28 MN/m，1000 m半径曲线及直线建议取20~25 MN/m。总的来说曲线半径越小，扣件合理刚度应设置得越大，以综合提升列车运行平稳性和缓和轮轨动力相互作用。
Abstract: This study established a metro vehicle-track coupled dynamics model to investigate the influence of fastener stiffness on wheel-rail dynamic interaction and train operational quality for Type A metro vehicles operating on small-radius curves. The results indicate that appropriate fastener stiffness effectively reduces wheel-rail dynamic interaction. Increasing fastener stiffness improves low-frequency stability of the vehicle-track system but intensifies high-frequency wheel-rail impact. Optimal fastener stiffness values were proposed for different curve radii: 30~35 MN/m for 400 m curves, 25~30 MN/m for 600 m curves, 23~28 MN/m for 800 m curves, and 20~25 MN/m for 1000 m curves and straight sections. In general, smaller curve radii require higher fastener stiffness to enhance ride comfort and mitigate wheel-rail dynamic interaction.
文章引用：王启, 付和林. 小半径曲线地铁A型车与扣件刚度匹配研究[J]. 动力系统与控制, 2026, 15(2): 109-118. https://doi.org/10.12677/dsc.2026.152012

参考文献

[1] 和振兴, 陈罄超, 周华龙, 等. 减振扣件与弹性道床垫组合减振关键参数研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2019, 36(6): 38-44.
[2] 孙建树, 和振兴, 石广田, 等. 城市轨道交通车辆段或停车场线路用减振扣件刚度参数研究[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2022, 25(7): 24-29.
[3] 谢甜, 赵坪锐, 章元爱. 基于减振性能的市域铁路弹性支承块轨道刚度匹配研究[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2023, 26(8): 175-179.
[4] 王宇. 地铁弹性分开式扣件合理垂向刚度匹配研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2015.
[5] 翟婉明. 车辆-轨道耦合动力学上[M]. 第4版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.
[6] Ren, Y., Qu, S., Yang, J., Luo, J., Zhu, S. and Zhai, W. (2024) Implementation of Variable Cross-Section Curved Beam in Train-Turnout Dynamic Interactions. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 283, Article 109662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Luo, J., Zhu, S. and Zhai, W. (2022) Formulation of Curved Beam Vibrations and Its Extended Application to Train-Track Spatial Interactions. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 165, Article 108393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Shen, Z.Y., Hedrick, J.K. and Elkins, J.A. (1983) A Comparison of Alternative Creep Force Models for Rail Vehicle Dynamic Analysis. Vehicle System Dynamics, 12, 79-83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] 国家铁路局. GB/T 5599-2019机车车辆动力学性能评定及试验鉴定规范[S/OL]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2019. https://std.samr.gov.cn/gb/search/gbDetailed?id=996A838ABFBE8372E05397BE0A0AD949, 2019-12-10.
[10] 北京市地方标准. DB11T 1714-2020城市轨道交通工程动态验收技术规范[S/OL]. 2020. https://std.samr.gov.cn/db/search/stdDBDetailed?id=A2211CA7CB19DA59E05397BE0A0A7CDD, 2020-03-25.

为你推荐