专家规范化指导对基层医院腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术学习曲线的影响
The Impact of Standardized Expert Guidance on the Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Community Hospitals
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1641315, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 高 翔, 陈 强, 于江涛*:安徽医科大学附属阜阳市人民医院肝胆胰腺外科,安徽 阜阳;王 巍:复旦大学附属肿瘤医院胰腺外科,上海
关键词: 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术学习曲线CUSUM模型基层医院Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Learning Curve CUSUM Model Primary Care Hospitals
摘要: 目的:探讨专家规范化指导对基层医院开展腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术学习曲线的影响。方法:回顾性分析2020年4月至2024年6月阜阳市人民医院连续50例TLPD患者资料。根据CUSUM学习曲线模型分为三期:初始高效期(n = 15)、调整波动期(n = 15)、稳定成熟期(n = 20)。比较三组术中指标(手术时间、出血量、中转开腹率)、术后恢复(引流时间、住院天数)及并发症(B/C级胰瘘、胆瘘、出血)。结果:三组术前基线资料无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。从初始期至成熟期,经过专家指导后,手术时间(491.9 ± 31.5 min vs. 406.3 ± 18.5 min)和术中出血量(138.7 [50, 300] mL vs. 83.5 [50, 100] mL)显著下降(P < 0.05)。成熟期B/C级胰瘘发生率较初始期降低(5.0% vs. 13.3%),术后住院时间缩短(19.6 ± 9.4 d vs. 12.3 ± 3.1 d)。结论:专家现场规范化指导通过优化钩突解剖、胰肠吻合等关键技术,显著缩短TLPD学习曲线,提高手术安全性,为基层医院开展复杂腹腔镜手术提供可行性路径。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the impact of standardized expert guidance on the learning curve for laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (TLPD) in a primary hospital setting. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 50 consecutive patients who underwent TLPD at Fuyang People’s Hospital from April 2020 to June 2024. Based on the cumulative sum (CUSUM) learning curve model, patients were divided into three phases: initial proficiency phase (n = 15), adjustment and fluctuation phase (n = 15), and stable mastery phase (n = 20). Intraoperative indicators (operative time, estimated blood loss, conversion to open surgery rate), postoperative recovery (duration of drainage, length of hospital stay), and complications (grade B/C pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, hemorrhage) were compared among the three groups. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in preoperative baseline characteristics among the three groups (P > 0.05). From the initial to the mastery phase, following expert guidance, operative time (491.9 ± 31.5 min vs. 406.3 ± 18.5 min) and intraoperative blood loss (138.7 [50, 300] mL vs. 83.5 [50, 100] mL) significantly decreased (P < 0.05). The incidence of grade B/C pancreatic fistula was lower in the mastery phase compared to the initial phase (5.0% vs. 13.3%), and postoperative hospital stay was shorter (19.6 ± 9.4 days vs. 12.3 ± 3.1 days). Conclusion: Standardized on-site expert guidance, by optimizing key techniques such as uncinate process dissection and pancreaticojejunostomy, significantly shortens the TLPD learning curve and enhances procedural safety, providing a feasible pathway for primary hospitals to implement complex laparoscopic surgeries.
文章引用:高翔, 陈强, 王巍, 于江涛. 专家规范化指导对基层医院腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术学习曲线的影响[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(4): 852-859. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1641315

参考文献

[1] 吴宝强, 李涛, 张旭东, 等. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术[J]. 手术电子杂志, 2022, 9(3): 7-8.
[2] 牟一平, 赵忠扩, 牟永华. 新时期腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术推广普及的关键[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2020, 26(8): 561-563.
[3] 高峰畏, 谢青云, 赵欣, 等. 腹腔镜下扩大淋巴结清扫的胰十二指肠切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志: 电子版, 2021, 15(3): 1.
[4] 杨雄心, 杨培, 曾新桃, 等. 地市级医院开展腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的学习曲线分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2025, 30(2): 91-95, 100.
[5] Barreto, S.G., Strobel, O., Salvia, R., Marchegiani, G., Wolfgang, C.L., Werner, J., et al. (2024) Complexity and Experience Grading to Guide Patient Selection for Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: An International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) Consensus. Annals of Surgery, 281, 417-429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Kim, H., Choi, H.Z., Kang, B.M. and Lee, J.W. (2022) Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Using Risk-Adjusted Cumulative Summation Methods. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 32, 401-407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 张建生, 李秋生, 刘建华, 等. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术学习曲线分析(附251例报告) [J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(4): 439-443, 448.
[8] Ielpo, B., Sanchez, P., Grande, L. and Burdio, F. (2022) Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy: How We Have Standardized the Technique (with Video). Updates in Surgery, 74, 1479-1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 王子铭, 张志忠, 刘文生, 等. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中胰背动脉的解剖观察及处理[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2023, 28(10): 733-738+753.
[10] Hashimoto, D., Okawa, T. and Matsumura, F. (2019) Training in the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Board Certification System for Expert Surgeons during 225 Consecutive Pancreaticoduodenectomies. Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 23, 145-154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Mazzola, M., Giani, A., Veronesi, V., Bernasconi, D.P., Benedetti, A., Magistro, C., et al. (2023) Multidimensional Evaluation of the Learning Curve for Totally Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Risk-Adjusted Cumulative Summation Analysis. HPB, 25, 507-517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Perri, G., van Hilst, J., Li, S., Besselink, M.G., Hogg, M.E. and Marchegiani, G. (2023) Teaching Modern Pancreatic Surgery: Close Relationship between Centralization, Innovation, and Dissemination of Care. BJS Open, 7, zrad081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Wang, H., Gao, X., Liu, M., Kong, X., Sun, H., Niu, Z., et al. (2024) The Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy by a Proficient Laparoscopic Surgeon: A Retrospective Study at a Single Center. BMC Surgery, 24, Article No. 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Qin, R., Kendrick, M.L., Wolfgang, C.L., Edil, B.H., Palanivelu, C., Parks, R.W., et al. (2020) International Expert Consensus on Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition, 9, 464-483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Shrikhande, S.V., Barreto, G. and Shukla, P.J. (2007) Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Impact of a Standardized Technique of Pancreaticojejunostomy. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 393, 87-91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 张静, 张海先. 根治性胰十二指肠切除术患者医院感染直接经济负担[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2025, 24(4): 526-531.
[17] 黄浩. 加速康复外科理念在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用现状[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2022, 27(4): 299-303.
[18] 冯道夫, 李琪, 沙元朴, 等. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术疗效与安全性的单中心回顾性分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2022, 31(3): 295-303.
[19] 叶泽耀. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术与同期开腹手术的单中心回顾性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2016.