重庆主城景区多模态语言景观的比较研究
A Comparative Study of Multimodal Linguistic Landscapes in Scenic Areas of Chongqing’s Central Urban Area
摘要: 本文以重庆主城景区为研究对象,探讨其多模态语言景观的形式特征与语用功能,旨在揭示民俗风貌类景区和历史文化与教育类景区的共性与差异。研究发现,两类景区都使用了“文字模态”“文字模态 + 图像模态”“文字模态 + 颜色模态”和“文字模态 + 图像模态 + 颜色模态”,且均以“文字模态 + 图像模态 + 颜色模态”为主,但在“文字模态 + 颜色模态”使用上差异较大。两类景区的多模态语言景观具有信息传递、突显自我、身份认同、文化传播的功能,且功能具有多重性,但各景区的侧重不同。本文揭示了多模态语言景观的协同作用机制,拓展了多模态语言景观研究的地域性视野。
Abstract: This study takes scenic areas in Chongqing’s central urban area as its research objects, and investigates the formal features and pragmatic functions of their multimodal linguistic landscapes, aiming to reveal the similarities and differences between folk-culture scenic areas and historical, cultural, and educational scenic areas. The findings show that both types of scenic areas employ four major modal configurations: text-only, text + image, text + color, and text + image + color. Among these, text + image + color is the dominant configuration in both types, while significant differences are observed in the use of text + color. The multimodal linguistic landscapes of both types of scenic areas serve the functions of information delivery, self-presentation, identity construction, and cultural communication. These functions are often realized in a multifunctional manner, although different scenic areas place varying emphases on them. This study reveals the synergistic mechanisms of multimodal linguistic landscapes and expands the regional scope of its research.
文章引用:张锦灿. 重庆主城景区多模态语言景观的比较研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(4): 64-72. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.144268

参考文献

[1] Landry, R. and Bourhis, R.Y. (1997) Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality: An Empirical Study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 23-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Kress, G. and Leeuwen, V.T. (2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd Edition, Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Pennycook, A. (2019) Linguistic Landscapes and Semiotic Assemblages. In: Pütz, M., Ed., Expanding the Linguistic Landscape, Channel View Publications, 75-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Correa, D. and Guerrero, C.H. (2024) Traces of Coloniality in Colombia’s Linguistic Landscape: A Multimodal Analysis of Language Centers’ English Advertisements. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 24, 1-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 陈敏. 网站的虚拟语言景观研究[J]. 汉字文化, 2022(18): 10-12.
[6] 伊诗琪, 李笑晴, 朱玺, 陈梦园, 商静. “一带一路”背景下景区多模态语言景观建设研究——基于全国四地景区的实证调查[J]. 经济学, 2022, 5(2): 33-35.
[7] Li, J. and Marshall, S. (2020) Engaging with Linguistic Landscaping in Vancouver’s Chinatown: A Pedagogical Tool for Teaching and Learning about Multilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23, 925-941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Cipria, A. and O’Rourke, E. (2024) Multimodal Analysis of the Spanish Linguistic Landscape in Alabama. Languages, 9, Article 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 李永斌. 八廓古街语言景观的“再历史化”研究[J]. 西藏研究, 2023(5): 123-133.
[10] 盛榕, 约翰·布坎南. 符号聚合: 传统聚落空间多模态语言景观研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 23(5): 113-120.
[11] Wu, J. and Huang, L. (2024) Ethnic Identity Construction through Multimodal Linguistic Landscape at Ban Arunotai in Thailand. Asian Ethnicity, 26, 296-317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 杨若蕖, 张爱萍. “兰州国际马拉松赛”多模态语言景观调查研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2019(6): 40-51.
[13] 李琛. 西安历史文化街区多模态语言景观研究——基于文化资本理论视角[J]. 文化学刊, 2022(10): 218-221.
[14] 张琼. 多模态5A景区语言景观功能分析——以星湖景区为例[J]. 中国科技翻译, 2021, 34(2): 44-46, 50.
[15] Xianzhi, W. and Yanan, J. (2024) A Study on Linguistic Landscape of Zibo from the Multimodal Perspective. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology, 6, 56-63.
[16] 丛晨, 何劲鹏, 杨伟群. 大型体育赛事语言景观的呈现特征、建构经验与提升策略——以北京2022年冬奥会为例[J]. 体育学刊, 2024(1): 71-78.
[17] Juffermans, K. (2013) Multimodality and Audiences: Local Languaging in the Gambian Linguistic Landscape. Sociolinguistic Studies, 6, 259-284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 毛力群, 朱赟昕. 义乌淘宝村语言景观的多模态分析[J]. 浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 45(6): 44-50.
[19] Permana, P.G.A.M., Ma, L., Insani, K.F. and Rusmawati, R. (2023) News Site as Virtual Linguistic Landscape: Representation on Linguistic Landscape and Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Alphabet: A Biannual Academic Journal on Language, Literary, and Cultural Studies, 6, 81-103.
[20] 刘楚群. 语言景观之城市映像研究[J]. 语言战略研究, 2017, 2(2): 20-26.
[21] Backhaus, P. (2007) Linguistic Landscapes. Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Shohamy, E. and Gorter, D. (2009) Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Spolsky, B. and Cooper, R.L. (1991) The Languages of Jerusalem. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Gorter, D. (2006) Introduction: The Study of the Linguistic Landscape as a New Approach to Multilingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3, 1-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Hasan Amara, M. and Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006) Linguistic Landscape as Symbolic Construction of the Public Space: The Case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3, 7-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] 李战子. 多模式话语的社会符号学分析[J]. 外语研究, 2003(5): 1-8.
[27] 车春柳. 世界级旅游景区建设研究——以语言景观国际化为视角[J]. 社会科学家, 2022(11): 42-48.
[28] 张景霓, 王佳赫. 文化性、地方性与现代性: 多模态旅游语言景观的功能与规划[J]. 社会科学家, 2022(3): 56-63.