基于知识图谱与反事实提示的跨境供应链韧性增强与可解释性决策研究
Research on Cross-Border Supply Chain Resilience Enhancement and Explainable Decision-Making Based on Knowledge Graph and Counterfactual Prompting
摘要: 全球贸易格局的动荡与不确定性,使得构建具有韧性的跨境供应链成为企业生存与发展的关键。传统AI决策模型在跨境供应链管理中存在“黑箱”操作、知识滞后与动态适应性不足等问题,为此提出了一种创新的融合框架——供应链语义网络与Prompt可解释性增强系统,通过构建结构化的跨境供应链领域知识图谱,为AI提供可推理的领域知识基础;进而设计“图谱增强Prompt”范式,实现自然语言交互下的复杂网络查询与风险诊断;并创新引入“反事实提示”机制,通过假设性场景推演生成具有因果解释的韧性优化方案,显著提升决策透明度与可审计性。基于该框架开发的系统原型,不但能够提升供应链风险定位效率,降低潜在损失,也为人机协同、可信赖的供应链智能决策提供了有效工具与方法。
Abstract: The turbulence and uncertainty of the global trade landscape have made building resilient cross-border supply chains a critical factor for enterprise survival and development. Traditional AI decision-making models in cross-border supply chain management suffer from issues such as “black-box” operations, knowledge lag, and insufficient dynamic adaptability. To address these, this paper proposes an innovative integrated framework—the Supply Chain Semantic Network and Prompt Explainability Enhancement System. By constructing a structured cross-border supply chain domain knowledge graph, it provides AI with a foundational layer of domain knowledge for reasoning. Subsequently, a “Graph-Enhanced Prompt” paradigm is designed to enable complex network queries and risk diagnostics through natural language interaction. Furthermore, a “Counterfactual Prompt” mechanism is innovatively introduced to generate resilient optimization solutions with causal explanations through hypothetical scenario simulations, significantly improving decision transparency and auditability. The system prototype developed based on this framework can not only enhance the efficiency of supply chain risk identification and reduce potential losses but also provide an effective tool and method for human-machine collaborative and trustworthy intelligent decision-making in supply chains.
文章引用:张宝明, 林恒好. 基于知识图谱与反事实提示的跨境供应链韧性增强与可解释性决策研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(4): 190-198. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.154386

参考文献

[1] Sheffi, Y. (2005) The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage. MIT Press.
[2] Christopher, M. and Peck, H. (2004) Building the Resilient Supply Chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Ivanov, S., Gretzel, U., Berezina, K., Sigala, M. and Webster, C. (2019) Progress on Robotics in Hospitality and Tourism: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 10, 489-521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 蔡梦思, 魏婉莹, 谭索怡. 复杂供应链网络建模: 研究进展与展望[J]. 系统管理学报, 2025, 34(6): 1613-1634.
[5] Hosseini, S.S., Khodaiyan, F., Kazemi, M. and Najari, Z. (2019) Optimization and Characterization of Pectin Extracted from Sour Orange Peel by Ultrasound Assisted Method. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 125, 621-629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 王旭坪, 王悦, 李娅, 等. 果蔬采后分级和预冷车辆协同调度模型与算法[J]. 系统管理学报, 2024, 33(1): 76-89.
[7] Birge, J.R., Capponi, A. and Chen, P. (2022) Disruption and Rerouting in Supply Chain Networks. Operations Research, 71, 750-767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Zhao, T., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Wang, J., Chen, S., Gao, N., et al. (2021) Disome-Seq Reveals Widespread Ribosome Collisions That Promote Cotranslational Protein Folding. Genome Biology, 22, Article No. 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 吴凯佳, 王铭聪. 能源企业可持续供应链知识图谱构建与应用研究[J]. 科技经济市场, 2024(2): 35-37.
[10] 张夏恒. 新质生产力与现代化产业体系双向赋能机理和路径研究[J]. 产业经济评论, 2025(3): 5-18.
[11] 王晶晶, 周超. 大数据背景下机器学习算法适用性及分析[J]. 科技与创新, 2026(2): 29-32.
[12] 周宇, 朱浩, 刁佳宁, 等. 机器学习技术在畜禽育种上的应用现状及发展趋势[J/OL]. 中国畜禽种业, 1-11. 2026-02-11.[CrossRef
[13] Bosma, M., Chi, E., Ichter, B., Le, Q.V., Schuurmans, D., Wang, X., et al. (2022) Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 24824-24837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Kassner, N., Dufter, P. and Schütze, H. (2021) Multilingual LAMA: Investigating Knowledge in Multilingual Pretrained Language Models. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, April 2021, 3250-3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Lipton, Z.C. (2018) The Mythos of Model Interpretability: In Deep Learning, the Concept of Interpretability Is Both Important and Slippery. Queue, 16, 31-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 郭漩, 张金雪, 魏伊冰. 大语言模型提示学习增强的轨迹知识图谱构建方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2025, 27(12): 2789-2801.
[17] 徐立祥, 许巍, 陈恩红, 等. KENN: 线性结构熵的图核神经网络[J]. 软件学报, 2024, 35(5): 2430-2445.
[18] 卢新元, 徐安琪, 张进澳. 探寻可解释人工智能(XAI)的“解释奇点”: 基于AIGC信息采纳视角[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2026, 10(1): 76-87.