电商直播互动性对用户粘性的影响及提升路径
The Impact and Promotion Path of Interactivity in E-Commerce Live Streaming on User Engagement
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.154400, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘钱钱, 曹 辉:江苏大学教师教育学院,江苏 镇江
关键词: 电商直播互动性用户粘性社会临场感提升路径E-Commerce Live Streaming Interactivity User Engagement Social Presence Promotion Path
摘要: 电商直播已成为数字经济时代的主流消费场景,而用户粘性作为衡量平台长期竞争力的核心指标,其形成机制备受关注。本文基于SOR理论与社会临场感理论系统阐释了互动性对用户粘性的作用机理,互动性通过“认知–情感–行为”三重路径塑造用户粘性:信息型互动降低认知成本、关系型互动激发情感共鸣、操作型互动形成行为惯性。在此基础上,本文提出人设化互动打造情感联结、工具化互动降低参与门槛、社群化互动延伸使用场景、共创化互动重构价值关系四条提升路径,并结合李佳琦直播间、京东全球购等实际案例予以论证,以期为直播电商从业者优化互动策略、构建可持续的用户关系提供理论参考与实践启示。
Abstract: Live e-commerce has become a mainstream consumption scenario in the digital economy era, and user stickiness, as a core metric for measuring a platform’s long-term competitiveness, has garnered significant attention regarding its formation mechanism. Based on SOR theory and social presence theory, this paper systematically explains the mechanism by which interactivity affects user stickiness. Interactivity shapes user stickiness through a “cognition-emotion-behavior” triple path: informational interaction reduces cognitive costs, relational interaction triggers emotional resonance, and operational interaction forms behavioral inertia. On this basis, the paper proposes four enhancement paths: persona-driven interaction to build emotional connections, tool-based interaction to lower participation barriers, community-based interaction to extend usage scenarios, and co-creative interaction to reconstruct value relationships. These are illustrated with practical cases such as Li Jiaqi’s live streaming sessions and JD Global Shopping, aiming to provide theoretical reference and practical insights for live e-commerce practitioners to optimize interaction strategies and build sustainable user relationships.
文章引用:刘钱钱, 曹辉. 电商直播互动性对用户粘性的影响及提升路径[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(4): 312-319. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.154400

参考文献

[1] 中国互联网络信息中心. 第56次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL]. 2025-08-29.
https://www.cnnic.cn/n4/2025/0721/c88-11328.html, 2026-02-26.
[2] Steuer, J. (1992) Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42, 73-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Rafaeli, S. (1988) Interactivity: From New Media to Communication. In: Hawkins, R.P., Wiemann, J.M. and Pingree, S., Eds., Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes, Sage, 110-134.
[4] Liu, Y. and Shrum, L.J. (2002) What Is Interactivity and Is It Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31, 53-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] van Dijk, J. (2004) Digital Media. In: Downing, J.D.H., McQuail, D., Schlesinger, P. and Wartella, E., Eds., The SAGE Handbook of Media Studies, SAGE Publications, Inc., 145-164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] McMillan, S.J. (2002) Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, and Systems. In: Lievrouw, L.A. and Livingstone, S., Eds., Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs, SAGE Publications, Ltd, 163-182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Striner, A., Azad, S. and Martens, C. (2017) A Common Framework for Audience Interactivity. Proceedings of the 2017 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, New York, 15-18 October 2017, 15-27.
[8] 范小军, 蒋欣羽, 倪思怡. 直播带货中互动性对消费者购买意愿的影响研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2020(12): 108-111.
[9] 王玉珍, 窦晓艺. 直播电商中互动性对消费者购买行为影响研究——基于用户粘性中介作用的分析[J]. 统计与管理, 2025, 40(6): 63-68.
[10] 张学波. 数字消费背景下电商直播互动对消费者冲动购买意愿的影响——社会临场感和心理距离的链式中介作用[J]. 山东青年政治学院学报, 2025, 41(2): 107-116.
[11] 南宁市融媒体中心. 京东全球购七夕团播圆满收官: 双团PK获超400万点赞, 实物打赏开辟“内容 + 电商”新路径[EB/OL].
http://m.nnwb.nnnews.net/p/179595.html, 2025-08-29.
[12] Mehrabian, A. and Russell, J.A. (1974) An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT Press.
[13] Eroglu, S.A., Machleit, K.A. and Davis, L.M. (2001) Atmospheric Qualities of Online Retailing: A Conceptual Model and Implications. Journal of Business Research, 54, 177-184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 孙紫悦. “直播电商”客户体验的影响因素及优化策略[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(9): 24-32.
[15] 徐岸峰, 刘紫辉. 直播带货情境下消费者购买决策的影响因素——基于注意力经济视角[J]. 商业经济研究, 2024(1): 83-86.
[16] 李洁, 刘昕, 陈家玮. 电商直播中主播特征对消费者购买意愿的影响机制研究[J]. 现代商业, 2025(5): 52-55.
[17] Ling, K.J. (2024) The Mechanism of the Influence of Live Streaming Shopping on Consumer Purchasing Behaviour in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry. Master’s Thesis, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
[18] Shui, X., Bian, S. and Zhang, P. (2025) How Can AI Virtual Streamers Gain Consumer Trust to Influence Purchase Intention in Live-Streaming E-Commerce? Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20, Article 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Liang, M., Jin, Z., Diao, Y. and Jin, C. (2025) Impact of Live Streaming Commerce on Continuous Intention: An Exploration Based on Post Acceptance Model and SOR Model. Sage Open, 15, 13-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 蔡红梅. 电商直播情境下消费者粘性行为因素分析[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(4): 742-754.
[21] 李明伟, 魏亚楠. 电商直播平台用户持续使用和推荐意愿研究——基于直播社会临场感视角的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2024(3): 174-178.
[22] 徐新, 杨燕. 直播带货社会临场感对消费者购买意愿的影响——基于顾客粘性中介与主播类型调节作用[J]. 商业经济研究, 2024(4): 83-86.
[23] Tian, L., Hai, Y., Wang, S., Ma, G. and Pillalamarri, S. (2026) The Interactive Impact of Social Interaction and Product Involvement on Customer Stickiness in the Context of Live Streaming E-Commerce. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1724223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 中新网上海. 角色迭代模式让直播间成为用户需求“收集器”、品牌合作“连接器” [EB/OL].
https://www.sh.chinanews.com.cn/shms/2025-12-26/143647.shtml, 2025-12-26.
[25] 百度开发者中心. 大模型赋能直播间: 技术重构电商交互新范式[EB/OL].
https://developer.baidu.com/article/detail.html?id=5304558, 2025-12-06.
[26] 成海燕, 孙婷昊. 数字经济背景下直播电商中消费者持续购买意愿的影响机制研究[J]. 河北工程大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 42(1): 19-27.