顶底角钢节点抗震性能有限元分析
Finite Element Analysis of Seismic Performance for Top Bottom Angle Steel Joint
摘要: 为助力装配式建筑实现高质量发展,解决传统现浇梁柱节点施工效率偏低、抗震性能欠佳的问题,本文以加强型顶底角钢(SAS)装配式梁柱节点为研究对象,结合不同加劲肋宽厚比与螺栓孔径设计参数,开展相关有限元模拟与抗震性能研究工作。
Abstract: To promote the high-quality development of prefabricated buildings and address the shortcomings of low construction efficiency and insufficient seismic performance of traditional cast-in-place beam-column joints, this study focuses on stiffened top-and-seat angle (SAS) prefabricated beam-column joints and conducts finite element simulation and performance research based on different stiffener width-thickness ratios and bolt hole diameters.
文章引用:马成浩, 董锦坤. 顶底角钢节点抗震性能有限元分析[J]. 土木工程, 2026, 15(4): 50-57. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2026.154079

参考文献

[1] 匡祯斌. 钢结构螺栓端板连接节点的受力性能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2004.
[2] 杨立国. 轻型钢框架端板连接节点受力性能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2005.
[3] 王路遥, 张艳霞, 刘金瑶, 等. 钢结构梁柱扩翼型节点抗震性能的有限元分析[C]//中国岩石力学与工程学会工程安全与防护分会. 第2届全国工程安全与防护学术会议论文集(下册). 北京: 北京建筑工程学院; 太原: 山西省建筑科学研究院, 2010: 435-440.
[4] 李文翰. 新型墙板装配式钢结构住宅体系及其关键技术的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2014.
[5] 管东芝. 梁端底筋锚入式预制梁柱连接节点抗震性能研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 南京: 东南大学, 2017.
[6] 韩伟. 新型耗能金属组合件钢框架梁柱连接节点抗震性能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 长安大学, 2020.
[7] 王沛怡. 新型震后可修复装配式梁柱连接节点抗震性能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2022.
[8] 张艳霞, 李宏伟, 黄哲文, 张大为. 装配式钢结构自攻螺栓-芯筒法兰柱连接节点抗震性能有限元分析[J]. 北京建筑大学学报, 2023, 39(2): 98-104.
[9] 张大帅. 低烈度区多层全装配式钢框架住宅梁柱连接节点抗震性能与设计方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2023.
[10] 张磊, 甄伟, 王晓冬, 李伟, 朱斌. 分层装配消能支撑钢结构梁柱节点与子结构抗震性能有限元分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2024, 45(S2): 257-266.
[11] Han, F., Zhang, X., Lu, Y., Cao, Y. and Qu, Z. (2026) Seismic Performance of the Elevator Counterweight System Based on a Substructural Shaking Table Test Method. Engineering Structures, 348, Article 121790.
[12] Fang, S., Wang, Z., Guo, X., Ma, D. and Song, X. (2025) Seismic Performance of Traditional Chinese Timber Structures with Geshan: Numerical and Experimental Study. Structures, 82, Article 110757.
[13] Liu, F., Zhang, X., Wu, Y., Nie, M., Cui, L., Li, J. and Tian, Q. (2025) Stiffness Compensation and Multi-Objective Parameter Optimization for Seismic Performance of Ancient Timber Structures Retrofitted with Friction Dampers. Structures, 82, Article 110698.
[14] Dong, B., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Ma, X., Chen, Z. and Zhai, Z. (2025) Seismic Performance and Post-Earthquake Damage Repair Capability of K-Type Eccentrically Braced Hybrid Structures. Structures, 82, Article 110706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Chen, S., Yu, C., Li, Y. and Shu, Z. (2025) Asymmetric Seismic Behavior of the Daikai Subway Station under Obliquely Incident SV-Waves: Insights from 3D Soil-Structure Interaction Modeling. Structures, 82, Article 110776.
[16] Chowdhury, K. and Karmakar, S. (2025) Inelastic Seismic Performance of Idealised Asymmetric Structures under Bidirectional Ground Excitation. Structures, 82, Article 110801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Liu, W., Zeng, B., Wu, C., Fang, H., Xiao, Z. and Wang, C. (2025) Evaluation of Anti-Progressive Collapse Performance of Locally Corroded Large-Span Steel Structures. Structures, 82, Article 110829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Ashrafifar, J., Azhari, F., Hashemi, J. and Yazdi, H.A. (2026) Effects of Loading Protocols on the Seismic Performance of Non-Structural Drywall Partitions. Journal of Building Engineering, 117, Article 114772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Yang, Y., Du, L., Zhang, B. and Li, N. (2025) Seismic Performance Evaluation of the GFRP-PB Tubular Connector-Lightweight Aggregate Sandwich Wall Panel Structural System. Construction and Building Materials, 505, Article 144763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef