基于RTS评分的创伤抢救小组模式对改善急诊多发伤患者急救情况和心理状态的效果
The Effect of a Trauma Rescue Team Model Based on RTS Scoring on Improving Emergency Treatment Outcomes and Psychological Status of Emergency Polytrauma Patients
摘要: 目的:探究急诊多发伤患者应用基于修正创伤评分(Revised Trauma Score, RTS)的创伤抢救小组模式的效果。方法:将我院自2024年1月~2024年12月收治的72例急诊多发伤患者纳入研究。根据护理方法不同分为RTS组(n = 36)、基础组(n = 36)。基础组给予基础护理,RTS组在此基础上加用基于RTS评分的创伤抢救小组模式。比较两组的急救情况、心理状态、护理质量及疾病进展情况。结果:RTS组急救情况均少于基础组(P < 0.05);RTS组心理状态评分均少于基础组(P < 0.05);RTS组护理质量评分高于基础组(P < 0.05);RTS组疾病进展情况少于基础组(P < 0.05)。结论:基于RTS评分的创伤抢救小组模式能够改善急诊多发伤患者的急救情况和心理状态,提高护理质量,减少疾病进展情况。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the effect of the trauma rescue team model based on the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) in emergency multiple trauma patients. Methods: A total of 72 emergency multiple trauma patients admitted to our hospital from January 2024 to December 2024 were included in the study. Based on different nursing methods, they were divided into the RTS group (n = 36) and the basic care group (n = 36). The basic care group received standard nursing, while the RTS group additionally implemented the trauma rescue team model based on RTS scores. The emergency treatment, psychological state, nursing quality, and disease progression were compared between the two groups. Results: The RTS group had significantly fewer emergency treatment complications than the basic care group (P < 0.05); the psychological state scores of the RTS group were lower than those of the basic care group (P < 0.05); the nursing quality scores of the RTS group were higher than those of the basic care group (P < 0.05); and the disease progression in the RTS group was less severe than that in the basic care group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The trauma rescue team model based on RTS scores can improve emergency treatment outcomes and psychological state in multiple trauma patients, enhance nursing quality, and reduce disease progression.
文章引用:龚婷. 基于RTS评分的创伤抢救小组模式对改善急诊多发伤患者急救情况和心理状态的效果[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(4): 1441-1446. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1641377

参考文献

[1] 张天乐, 陆玉梅, 李笑, 等. 创伤修正评分下的医护一体化护理在多发性创伤患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2023, 29(5): 105-108.
[2] 林颖, 刘春光, 刘良明, 等. 重症成人多发伤患者不同创伤评分的比较研究[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2020, 22(11): 804-808.
[3] 蓝薇, 施琪嘉. 临床用创伤后应激障碍诊断量表中文版信效度研究[J]. 神经损伤与功能重建, 2014, 9(4): 291-293, 356.
[4] 黄冠, 何萌, 骆丽, 等. 院前急救护士岗位胜任力评价量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2023, 39(23): 1773-1778.
[5] 胡鑫, 贾乐, 徐学鹏, 等. 关节镜下自体胭绳肌腱联合人工韧带一期重建膝关节多发韧带损伤26例[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2022, 30(5): 59-62, 67.
[6] 程汝妍. 修正创伤评分指导下多学科团队合作创伤团队一体化急救护理在严重多发性创伤休克患者救护中的应用[J]. 中外医药研究, 2024, 3(18): 90-92.
[7] 方熙, 刘丹, 李华, 等. RTS评分联合BAR预测急诊创伤绿色通道患者预后的回顾性研究[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 43(11): 1562-1567.
[8] 黄红霞. 基于修正休克指数的分诊护理对急诊创伤患者救治效率及预后的影响[J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文), 2021, 7(8): 193-195.