保留前列腺尖部组织的经尿道等离子前列腺 剜除术整体剜除治疗中等体积前列腺增生 的临床效果观察
Clinical Observation of the Overall Enucleation Effect of Transurethral Plasma Enucleation of the Prostate with Preservation of the Prostatic Apex Tissue in the Treatment of Moderate-Volume Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
摘要: 目的:探讨保留前列腺尖部组织的经尿道等离子前列腺整体剜除术,对于中等体积前列腺增生患者的临床应用效果。方法:本研究回顾性分析2023年6月至2024年5月在昆明医科大学第二附属医院接受手术治疗的60例良性前列腺增生患者。观察组采用保留前列腺尖部组织的经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术30例,对照组采用传统经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术30例。比较两组患者一般资料、围手术期指标、术后尿控及并发症有无差异。结果:观察组和对照组均顺利完成手术,观察组在术后血红蛋白下降量、留置导尿管及膀胱冲洗时间少于对照组,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);观察组手术时间、术后住院时间少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组和对照组在术前IPSS、QOL评分及Qmax、PVR比较中,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);在术后IPSS、QOL评分比较中,观察组低于对照组,拔除尿管后的24 h内及术后1周,观察组的尿失禁发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术后Qmax水平高于术前,观察组高于对照组,术后PVR水平低于术前,观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组术后随访3个月,并发症发生率比较,差异没有统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:保留前列腺尖部组织的经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术整体剜除治疗中等体积前列腺增生的手术方式可缩短手术时间、术后住院时间,有助于缩短术后恢复时间,术后患者排尿功能恢复较好,生活质量满意度较高,且能够减少患者术后短期尿失禁。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the clinical application effect of transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate with preservation of the prostatic apex tissue in patients with moderate-sized benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 60 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent surgical treatment at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from June 2023 to May 2024. The observation group comprised 30 cases treated with transurethral plasma enucleation of the prostate with preservation of the prostatic apical tissue, whereas the control group received conventional transurethral plasma enucleation of the prostate in 30 cases. The study compared demographic characteristics, perioperative indicators, postoperative urinary control, and complication rates between the two groups. Results: The surgical interventions were successfully performed in both study cohorts. When comparing postoperative outcomes, the experimental cohort demonstrated reduced hemoglobin decline, shorter catheter retention periods, and decreased bladder irrigation durations relative to the comparison group, though these variations did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). Notably, the experimental group exhibited substantially shorter operative durations and reduced hospitalization periods compared to the control group, with these differences proving statistically meaningful (P < 0.05). Initial assessments of IPSS, quality of life metrics, maximum urinary flow rates, and postvoid residual volumes revealed no significant intergroup disparities prior to surgery (P > 0.05). Following the procedure, the experimental group showed marked improvements in IPSS and quality of life scores compared to controls. Additionally, during the initial 24-hour period after catheter extraction and at the one-week postoperative evaluation, the experimental cohort displayed a significantly lower occurrence of urinary incontinence relative to the control group. The analysis revealed clinically meaningful variations (P < 0.05) between the measured parameters. When examining urinary flow rates, postoperative Qmax measurements demonstrated notable improvement from baseline levels, with the study group exhibiting superior outcomes relative to the comparison group. Regarding residual urine volumes, postoperative PVR measurements showed substantial reduction from preoperative values, with the experimental group displaying significantly better results than the reference group, all reaching statistical significance (P < 0.05). Throughout the 90-day monitoring period following surgery, Evaluation of adverse event frequencies between both cohorts did not yield statistically meaningful distinctions (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The transurethral plasma prostate enucleation surgery that retains the apex tissue of the prostate and is used for the overall enucleation treatment of medium-sized prostatic hyperplasia can shorten the operation time and postoperative hospital stay, help shorten the postoperative recovery time, result in better recovery of the patient’s urination function after surgery, higher satisfaction with quality of life, and reduce the incidence of short-term urinary incontinence.
文章引用:叶红志, 文代艳, 王艳婷, 曹勇杰, 李祥孟, 韦海荣, 袁顺辉. 保留前列腺尖部组织的经尿道等离子前列腺 剜除术整体剜除治疗中等体积前列腺增生 的临床效果观察[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(4): 1490-1498. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1641383

参考文献

[1] Huang, S., Tsai, C., Tseng, C., Shih, M., Yeh, Y., Chien, K., et al. (2019) Comparative Efficacy and Safety of New Surgical Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. BMJ, 367, l5919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 尚毫杰, 李备, 刘畅, 等. 经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术与经尿道前列腺双极等离子电切术治疗老年、大体积良性前列腺增生症的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 华中科技大学学报(医学版), 2021, 50(1): 77-81.
[3] 赵虎, 孙士成, 王必亮, 等. 经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术与经尿道前列腺等离子电切术治疗良性前列腺增生症疗效比较[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2020, 48(2): 202-205.
[4] 熊毅, 王芸, 钟起鸿. 经尿道双极等离子剜除术与经尿道双极等离子电切术治疗前列腺增生的效果研究[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2024, 35(4): 568-569+572.
[5] 徐刚. 经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗老年小体积前列腺增生患者的效果比较[J]. 中国民康医学, 2025, 37(19): 150-152+156.
[6] 夏宗禹, 王琴, 刘胜. 经尿道前列腺双极等离子电切术和前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的效果[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2019, 39(11): 2444-2450.
[7] 屈颖伟, 何文强, 郑聪, 等. 保留前列腺尖部的经尿道前列腺等离子剜除术临床研究[J]. 罕少疾病杂志, 2022, 29(9): 57-58.
[8] 郑庆, 王民, 郑宇皓. 经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生患者的效果比较[J]. 中国民康医学, 2025, 37(12): 135-138.
[9] Asimakopoulos, A.D., Annino, F., Colalillo, G., Gaston, R., Piechaud, T., Mauriello, A., et al. (2023) “Urethral-Sparing” Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Critical Appraisal of the Safety of the Technique Based on the Histologic Characteristics of the Prostatic Urethra. Current Oncology, 30, 1065-1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Endo, F., Ohwaki, K., Shimbo, M. and Hattori, K. (2018) Relationship between Intraprostatic Urethral Sphincter Status and Prostate Volume as Revealed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Urology, 118, 141-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Costa, D.N., Meng, X., Tverye, A., Bagrodia, A., Recchimuzzi, D.Z., Xi, Y., et al. (2023) Preoperative Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Structured Report Informs Risk for Positive Apical Surgical Margins during Radical Prostatectomy. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 47, 38-44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Srougi, M., Nesrallah, L.J., Kauffmann, J.R., Nesrallah, A. and Leite, K.R.M. (2001) Urinary Continence and Pathological Outcome after Bladder Neck Preservation during Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Prospective Trial. Journal of Urology, 165, 815-818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Mungovan, S.F., Sandhu, J.S., Akin, O., Smart, N.A., Graham, P.L. and Patel, M.I. (2017) Preoperative Membranous Urethral Length Measurement and Continence Recovery Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Urology, 71, 368-378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Nunez Bragayrac, L.A., Hussein, A.A., Attwood, K., Pop, E., James, G., Osei, J., et al. (2020) Feasibility and Continence Outcomes of Extended Prostatic Urethral Preservation during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 23, 286-294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Ohara, E., Kawamorita, N., Satake, Y., Kaiho, Y., Mitsuzuka, K., Saito, H., et al. (2022) Minimal Residual Membranous Urethral Length and Membranous Urethral Length Predict Poor Recovery from Incontinence after Robot‐Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and after Open Radical Prostatectomy. International Journal of Urology, 29, 1517-1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 谢志鹏. 保留前列腺尖部尿道钬激光剜除术治疗中等体积前列腺增生的疗效分析[C]//《中国医院院长》杂志, 中国医药物资协会智慧医疗分会, 山西省继续医学教育协会. 2025第七届智慧医院建设与发展大会论文集. 2025: 16-18, 21.
[17] 王文希, 高强利, 陈磊. 保留前列腺尖部尿道钬激光剜除术治疗中等体积前列腺增生的疗效分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2024, 28(1): 65-70.
[18] Laucirica, O., Gomez, E., Hajianfar, R., Vilanova, J.C. and Muniesa, M. (2020) Complete Puborectalis, Puboperinealis Muscle and Urethral Rhabdomyosphincter Preservation in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Anatomical Landmarks to Achieve Early Urinary Continence. International Journal of Urology, 27, 525-536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 魏巍, 张刚, 夏玉军. 基于前列腺解剖的比较治疗良性前列腺增生不同微创术式的临床研究[J]. 泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 12(3): 36-41.