“盒威胁”下个人数据法权益的保护及责任认定
Protection of Legal Interests in Personal Data and Liability Attribution under “Doxxing Threats”
摘要: 随着个人信息黑灰产与网络暴力相互勾连,“开盒”已由一般“人肉搜索”异化为以非法获取、整合加工、公开扩散公民个人信息为核心,并诱发侮辱、诽谤、线下骚扰等后果的链条化、产业化、跨平台乃至跨境违法犯罪形态。围绕“开盒”产业链的刑事责任认定,司法实践中仍面临行为类型交叉、罪名适用边界模糊、共同犯罪层级复杂、电子证据固定困难以及跨境溯源追责不畅等问题。本文以“开盒”产业链的刑事责任认定困境与破解为研究中心,在梳理上游非法获取、中游整合交易、下游扩散煽动等行为结构的基础上,提出通过细化构成要件判断规则、强化分层分类追责、完善电子证据规范并推动跨部门与跨境协同治理,提升对“开盒”行为的精准规制与个人信息法益保护水平。
Abstract: With the convergence of the black market for personal information and cyber violence, “doxxing” has evolved from ordinary “human flesh search” into a chain-based, industrialized, cross-platform, and even transnational form of unlawful and criminal conduct centered on the illegal acquisition, aggregation, processing, and public dissemination of citizens’ personal information, often triggering insults, defamation, and offline harassment. In judicial practice, the criminal liability of the doxxing supply chain still faces a number of difficulties, including the overlap of behavioral types, blurred boundaries in the application of criminal charges, the complexity of accomplice liability, difficulties in the preservation of electronic evidence, and obstacles to cross-border tracing and accountability. Focusing on the dilemmas and solutions in identifying criminal liability within the doxxing supply chain, this paper analyzes the behavioral structure of upstream illegal acquisition, midstream integration and trading, and downstream dissemination and incitement, and proposes to improve the precision of legal regulation and the protection of personal information rights and interests by refining the rules for determining constituent elements, strengthening tiered and categorized accountability, improving the rules on electronic evidence, and promoting interdepartmental and cross-border collaborative governance.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
肖潇, 王峰. 最高检法律政策研究室主任杨剑波: 依法打击“网络开盒”等网络犯罪, 坚决摧毁利益链条[N]. 21世纪经济报道, 2026-03-06(005).
|
|
[2]
|
孙梓翔. 从“人肉搜索”到“网络开盒”: 侵犯公民个人信息犯罪的现状分析及治理路径研究[J]. 中国防伪报道, 2026(1): 72-79.
|
|
[3]
|
李光杰, 李小波. 网络“开盒”的多维风险及治理研究——基于行动者网络理论的透视[J/OL]. 北京警察学院学报: 1-19. 2026-03-09.[CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
胡宁. 个人信息在境外软件“裸奔”检察公益诉讼追责网络“开盒” [N]. 中国青年报, 2026-02-05(007).
|
|
[5]
|
李想. 新型网暴“开盒”: 警惕“数字时代的游街” [N]. 中国青年报, 2025-10-27(004).
|
|
[6]
|
刘艳红. 数字时代“网络开盒”的系统性治理[J]. 人民论坛, 2025(19): 83-87.
|
|
[7]
|
霍旻含. 严惩“开盒”, 给隐私“上锁” [N]. 人民日报海外版, 2025-07-07(008).
|
|
[8]
|
本刊采编中心. 加强未成年人网络保护构建多元协同治理格局[J]. 中国信息安全, 2025(6): 12.
|
|
[9]
|
李沅恒. “开盒”乱象中的未成年人个人信息权益危机与协同治理[J]. 中国信息安全, 2025(6): 44-47.
|
|
[10]
|
高艳东, 李华勇. 斩断“开盒”黑产链条, 重塑清朗网络[N]. 环球时报, 2025-05-30(015).
|
|
[11]
|
陈曦, 秦亦姝, 张小简. “开盒”污染网络生态, 网暴之门该咋关闭? [N]. 工人日报, 2025-05-28(004).
|
|
[12]
|
朱婧薇. 网络开盒: 数字时代的安全困局[J]. 光明少年, 2025(5): 12-13.
|
|
[13]
|
李娜. 侵犯公民人格权, “开盒”已成网络新毒瘤[N]. 宁夏法治报, 2025-04-16(006).
|
|
[14]
|
林碧涓. “开盒”事件敲响警钟数据应用需上好“安全锁” [N]. 通信信息报, 2025-04-09(003).
|
|
[15]
|
银昕. “开盒”事件追踪: 揭开数据交易“灰链” [N]. 中国工业报, 2025-04-07(005).
|
|
[16]
|
孟文静. 大数据时代下公民隐私权法律保护研究[J]. 公关世界, 2025(7): 118-120.
|