城市网约车与弱势交通参与者事故的时空特征与归因机制
Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Attribution Mechanism of Accidents between Urban Ride-Hailing and Vulnerable Traffic Participants
摘要: 解析网约车与弱势交通参与者(VRU)在复杂路网中的冲突机制,是系统提升城市交通韧性的关键。本文基于成都市113起网约车事故数据,构建“冲突模态–时空环境–行为归因”三维解构模型。数据分析表明:第一,因物理隔离缺失与驾驶员反应迟滞的重叠,涉及行人横穿的事故(占比42.7%),其致命率显著高于二轮车交叉冲突;第二,事故在几何拓扑上高度向四枝交叉口和早晚高峰期收敛,映射出派单算法压迫下的认知负荷饱和;第三,电驱动车型在低附着环境下的瞬时扭矩响应放大,构成了系统性的底层隐患。网约车事故是“阈值偏移–隐匿规则固化–反馈滞后”系统链条断裂的产物,据此本文提出了涵盖物理路网修复、算法强制熔断及线控底盘自适应等跨主体干预架构设想。
Abstract: Analyzing the conflict mechanism between ride-hailing and vulnerable traffic participants (VRUs) in complex road networks is the key to systematically improving urban traffic resilience. Based on the data of 113 ride-hailing accidents in Chengdu, this paper constructs a three-dimensional deconstruction model of “conflict mode-spatio-temporal environment-behavior attribution”. The data analysis shows that: first, due to the overlap between the lack of physical isolation and the driver’s delay, the fatality rate of accidents involving pedestrian crossing (accounting for 42.7%) is significantly higher than that of two-wheeled vehicle cross-collisions. Second, the accident converges to the intersection of the four branches and the morning and evening peak periods in the geometric topology, which reflects the saturation of the cognitive load under the pressure of the dispatch algorithm. Third, the instantaneous torque response of electric drive models in a low adhesion environment is amplified, which constitutes a systemic underlying hidden danger. The online car-hailing accident is the product of the system chain rupture of “threshold shift-concealment rule solidification-feedback lag”, so this paper proposes a cross-subject intervention architecture covering physical road network repair, algorithm forced fuse and wire-controlled chassis adaptation.
文章引用:赵亮. 城市网约车与弱势交通参与者事故的时空特征与归因机制[J]. 动力系统与控制, 2026, 15(2): 133-140. https://doi.org/10.12677/dsc.2026.152014

参考文献

[1] 张宇遨, 欧阳铭亮, 刘心雨. 巡游出租车与网约车运营服务规律对比分析[J]. 物流科技, 2026, 49(1): 67-71.
[2] 袁紫微, 赵道致, 陈铭洋, 等. 出租车竞争市场中网约车平台开放策略选择研究[J]. 管理学报, 2026, 23(2): 368-377.
[3] Munigety, C.R. and Mathew, T.V. (2016) Towards Behavioral Modeling of Drivers in Mixed Traffic Conditions. Transportation in Developing Economies, 2, Article No. 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Zhang, Y. and Fricker, J.D. (2021) Incorporating Conflict Risks in Pedestrian-Motorist Interactions: A Game Theoretical Approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 159, Article ID: 106254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Pal, C., Hirayama, S., Narahari, S., Jeyabharath, M., Prakash, G., Kulothungan, V., et al. (2018) Improvement of Injury Severity Prediction (ISP) of AACN during On-Site Triage Using Vehicle Deformation Pattern for Car-To-Car (C2C) Side Impacts. Traffic Injury Prevention, 19, S201-S204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 刘福聚, 王辰, 陈桂华, 等. 智能网联汽车交通事故研究[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024(5): 34-41.
[7] 城市建设理论研究(电子版) [J]. 城市建设理论研究(电子版), 2023(22): 2.
[8] 国家标准《城市道路交通设施设计规范》GB50688-2011局部修订条文及条文说明[J]. 工程建设标准化, 2019(9): 41-46.
[9] 王霄, 纪龙杰, 陈潘曦. 基于关联规则的酒醉驾交通事故成因分析[J]. 广东公安科技, 2021, 29(1): 44-47.
[10] Levickas, R. and Žuraulis, V. (2025) Stability Issues of Rear-Wheel-Drive Electric Vehicle during Regenerative Braking. Applied Sciences, 15, Article 10926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Patel, M., Jung, R. and Khatun, M. (2025). A Systematic Literature Review on Safety of the Intended Functionality for Automated Driving Systems. SAE Technical Paper 2025-01-5030.[CrossRef
[12] ISO (2022) Road Vehicles—Safety of the Intended Functionality: ISO 21448-2022. ISO.
[13] Kortschot, S.W. and Jamieson, G.A. (2019) Classification of Attentional Tunneling through Behavioral Indices. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 62, 973-986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Horrey, W.J. and Wickens, C.D. (2006) Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48, 196-205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 宿松亚, 黎真真. 基于道路交通安全交通事故成因分析——以兰州“11∙3”重大道路交通事故为例[J]. 上海公路, 2022(4): 162-165, 183.
[16] 寇敏, 张萌萌, 赵军学, 等. 道路交通安全风险辨识与分析方法综述[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2022, 40(6): 22-32.