中华文化主体性的哲学阐释与实践建构
Philosophical Interpretation and Practical Construction of Chinese Cultural Subjectivity
DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2026.154152, PDF,   
作者: 李国云:贵阳学院阳明学与黔学研究院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 主体客体文化主体性中华优秀传统文化Subject Object Cultural Subjectivity Excellent Traditional Chinese Culture
摘要: 论及中华文化主体性的内涵就不能脱离对“何为主体”“何为主体性”的哲学追问,厘清前者就为理解文化主体性奠定基础。文化主体性就是主体在文化方面占主体地位。文化主体性与中华文化主体性是一般和特殊的关系。未来,巩固文化主体性必须坚持以人民为中心,增强文化主体性的力量;坚持马克思主义指导地位,把握文化发展的正确方向;坚持从文明交流互鉴中增强中华优秀传统文化的辐射力;坚持现代科技与传统相结合,传承弘扬中华优秀传统文化。
Abstract: To discuss the connotation of Chinese cultural subjectivity, we cannot separate from the philosophical inquiry into “what is the subject” and “what is subjectivity”. Clarifying the former lays a foundation for understanding cultural subjectivity. Cultural subjectivity refers to the dominant position of the subject in the cultural field. Cultural subjectivity and Chinese cultural subjectivity are in a relation of universality and particularity. In the future, to consolidate cultural subjectivity, we must adhere to the people-centered approach to strengthen the power of cultural subjectivity; uphold the guiding role of Marxism to keep the correct direction of cultural development; enhance the radiating influence of excellent traditional Chinese culture through exchanges and mutual learning among civilizations; and integrate modern science and technology with traditions to inherit and promote excellent traditional Chinese culture.
文章引用:李国云. 中华文化主体性的哲学阐释与实践建构[J]. 哲学进展, 2026, 15(4): 205-209. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2026.154152

参考文献

[1] 马克思恩格斯文集(第1卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009.
[2] 勒内·笛卡尔. 第一哲学沉思集[M]. 徐陶, 译. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2009.
[3] 黄楠森. 论人的活动的主体性[J]. 阵地, 1991(6): 19.
[4] 邹广文, 方立波. 中华文化主体性的哲学内涵与巩固路径[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 37(4): 18-25.
[5] 陈浩辉. 论中华文化主体性的现代重构与巩固理路[J]. 理论界, 2025(5): 78-85.
[6] 朱继东, 李建鑫. 中华文化主体性的理论溯源及高扬理路[J]. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025(2): 1-14+167.