再定位颌垫和口腔健康教育治疗 颞下颌关节可复性盘前移位的 临床疗效及形态学评价
Efficacy and Morphological Evaluation of Repositioning Jaw Pads and Oral Health Education in the Treatment of Reversible Anterior Displacement of the Temporomandibular Joint
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1641405, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 梁伟明:皖南医科大学口腔医学院,安徽 芜湖;亳州市人民医院口腔科,安徽 亳州;孙恒祥, 郝树立:亳州市人民医院口腔科,安徽 亳州;柴 琳*:皖南医科大学口腔医学院,安徽 芜湖
关键词: 颞下颌关节可复性盘前移位再定位颌垫口腔健康教育磁共振Temporomandibular Disc Reversible Anterior Displacement Repositioning Jaw Pads Oral Health Education MRI
摘要: 目的:1) 研究再定位颌垫和口腔健康教育对治疗颞下颌关节可复性盘前移位的临床疗效;2) 从MRI角度研究再定位颌垫和口腔健康教育治疗前后颞下颌关节的内部组织结构变化。方法:收集43例符合纳入标准的于2024年3月~2025年10月在亳州市人民医院口腔科就诊的颞下颌关节可复性盘前移位患者,分为再定位颌垫治疗组(23例29侧)和口腔健康教育治疗组(20例24侧,使用皖南医科大学原创的颞下颌关节虚拟仿真课程软件),治疗3月后复诊,治疗前、后均进行颞下颌关节专科检查及MRI拍摄,分别比较治疗前后视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)、开口度、MRI影像学关节盘的形态、关节盘的长度、髁突的形态、髁突的高度、闭口位盘髁前移的角度等来研究再定位颌垫和口腔健康教育的临床疗效。结果:治疗前,两组研究对象的年龄、视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)、开口度、MRI影像学关节盘的长度、髁突的高度、闭口位盘髁前移的角度等的比较,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05),治疗结束后,再定位颌垫组与口腔健康教育组均能改善关节区疼痛(p < 0.05),再定位颌垫可以改善患者开口度(p < 0.05)、髁突高度(p < 0.05)、关节盘前移角度(p < 0.05)、关节盘形态以及髁突形态,但对于关节盘长度的改变无统计学意义(p > 0.05),口腔健康教育对于患者开口度(p > 0.05)、关节盘长度(p > 0.05)、髁突高度(p > 0.05)、关节盘形态以及髁突形态的变化上无统计学意义。结论:1) 口腔健康教育可改善颞下颌关节盘移位患者的临床症状但对于关节内部结构的改善效果不佳;2) 再定位颌垫可改善患者的临床症状而且效果优于口腔健康教育,对于关节内部结构的改善具有重要意义,并可使大部分患者前移关节盘的位置恢复正常(治愈率79.3%),而且对吸收髁突的骨质重建也具有重要意义。
Abstract: Objective: 1) To study the clinical efficacy of repositioning jaw pads versus oral health education in treating temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc repositioning. 2) To study the changes in the internal tissue structure of the temporomandibular joint before and after repositioning jaw pad treatment and oral health education from the perspective of MRI. Methods: A total of 43 patients with TMJ disc repositioning who met inclusion criteria were enrolled between March 2024 and October 2025 at the Department of Stomatology, Bozhou People’s Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: repositioning jaw pad therapy group (23 cases, 29 sides) and oral health education group (20 cases, 24 sides). Follow-up examinations were conducted three months post-treatment, with both groups undergoing specialized TMJ evaluations and MRI imaging. Clinical outcomes were assessed through visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, mouth opening range, MRI imaging of articular disc morphology, disc length, condylar morphology, condylar height, and angle of disc condylar anterior displacement in closed-mouth position. Results: Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) in age, visual analog pain score (VAS), mouth opening range, MRI-assessed disc length, condylar height, or condylar anterior displacement angle between the two groups. After treatment, both the repositioning jaw pad group and oral health education group showed significant improvements in joint pain (p < 0.05). The repositioning jaw pad effectively improved mouth opening range (p < 0.05), condylar height (p < 0.05), disc anterior displacement angle (p < 0.05), disc morphology, and condylar morphology, though it showed no significant effect on disc length (p > 0.05). Oral health education showed no significant effects on mouth opening range (p > 0.05), disc length (p > 0.05), condylar height (p > 0.05), disc morphology, or condylar morphology. Conclusion: 1) Oral health education can alleviate clinical symptoms in temporomandibular disc displacement patients but shows limited improvement in intra-articular structures. 2) The repositioning jaw pad significantly improves clinical symptoms with better efficacy than oral health education, demonstrating substantial value in restoring intra-articular structures. It normalizes disc position in most patients (cure rate: 79.3%) and enables bone reconstruction of resorbed condyles, making it clinically significant.
文章引用:梁伟明, 孙恒祥, 郝树立, 柴琳. 再定位颌垫和口腔健康教育治疗 颞下颌关节可复性盘前移位的 临床疗效及形态学评价[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(4): 1667-1676. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1641405

参考文献

[1] 傅开元, 雷杰. 颞下颌关节紊乱病的分类、诊断及治疗进展[J]. 口腔医学, 2024, 44(1): 6-10.
[2] 傅开元, 胡敏, 余强, 等. 颞下颌关节常规MRI检查规范及关节盘移位诊断标准的专家共识[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2020, 55(9): 608-612.
[3] 唐燕, 范帅, 姚远, 等. 540例颞下颌关节紊乱病患者口腔行为特点分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(5): 531-534.
[4] 薛青, 司家瑞, 孙燕雨, 等. 212例急慢性疼痛性颞下颌关节紊乱病患者的口腔行为分布及差异分析[J]. 口腔医学, 2025, 45(9): 681-686.
[5] Sun, R., Zhang, S., Si, J., Zhang, L., Yang, H., Ye, Z., et al. (2024) Association between Oral Behaviors and Painful Temporomandibular Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study in the General Population. Journal of Pain Research, 17, 431-439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 奚玫, 徐平平, 曾桂琼. 颞下颌关节紊乱症患者随访中进行健康指导的作用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2011, 27(23): 4321-4323.
[7] Luo, D., Qiu, C., Zhou, R., Yu, W., Li, X. and Yang, J. (2022) MRI-Based Observation of the Size and Morphology of Temporomandibular Joint Articular Disc and Condyle in Young Asymptomatic Adults. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 51, Article 20210272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 樊文萍, 刘梦琦, 张晓欢, 等. 颞下颌关节紊乱病患者髁突位置和形态的MRI观察[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2019, 54(8): 522-526.
[9] 顾姣娜, 焦博强, 李志勇. 颞下颌关节盘前移位病因研究进展[J]. 口腔医学, 2022, 42(10): 942-945.
[10] 陈逸恺, 李小兵. 咬合板临床疗效的文献计量与可视化分析[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2023, 16(3): 339-346.
[11] 李鑫, 陈志晔. 颞下颌关节盘移位的影像学研究进展[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2024, 45(4): 445-449.
[12] 王文晖, 甄俊平. 颞下颌关节紊乱病MRI研究进展[J]. 磁共振成像, 2022, 13(5): 148-150+166.
[13] 宋琰, 段振芳, 马宇锋. 颞下颌关节可复性盘移位的咬合治疗进展[J]. 口腔医学, 2022, 42(2): 188-192.
[14] 王欣瑞, 乔永明, 乔义强. 再定位颌垫治疗颞下颌关节可复性盘前移位的MRI初步评估[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2022, 57(9): 914-920.
[15] 胡健来, 董研. 咬合板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2019, 54(4): 273-277.