基于CiteSpace的脑梗死运动康复研究热点与 前沿分析(2021~2025)
Research Hotspots and Frontiers of Motor Rehabilitation for Cerebral Infarction Based on CiteSpace (2021~2025)
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1641465, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张 丹, 钟星杰:南宁市第二人民医院康复医学科,广西 南宁;包卓华*:广西壮族自治区江滨医院神经内一科,广西 南宁
关键词: 脑梗死运动康复CiteSpace文献计量学研究热点神经重塑Cerebral Infarction Motor Rehabilitation CiteSpace Bibliometrics Research Hotspots Neural Remodeling
摘要: 目的:分析2021~2025年国际脑梗死运动康复领域研究热点与前沿趋势,为临床康复策略制定及科研选题提供循证依据。方法:检索Web of Science核心合集,采用CiteSpace 6.4.2对1146篇文献进行可视化分析。结果:年度发文量呈波动上升并进入平稳平台期;中国发文量居全球首位,哈佛大学为最高产机构,Steven C. Cramer为领域核心作者,国际合作网络松散。关键词聚类识别出12个研究主题,形成基础机制、临床康复、智能评估三大方向,神经重塑、深度学习行为分析、手部运动量化为近年核心前沿;突现分析显示研究向神经影像评估、运动功能精准量化及脑机制探索演进。结论:近5年领域研究持续深化,中国为核心研究国;未来需加强国际协作,推动神经重塑机制研究与智能康复技术深度融合,提升精准化康复干预水平。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the research hotspots and frontier trends in the field of international stroke rehabilitation from 2021 to 2025, providing evidence-based support for the formulation of clinical rehabilitation strategies and the selection of research topics. Methods: A search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection, and CiteSpace 6.4.2 was used to conduct a visual analysis of 1146 articles. Results: The annual number of published articles showed a fluctuating upward trend and entered a stable plateau; China had the highest number of publications globally, Harvard University was the most productive institution, Steven C. Cramer was the core author in the field, and the international cooperation network was loose. Keyword clustering identified 12 research themes, forming three major directions: basic mechanisms, clinical rehabilitation, and intelligent assessment. Neural remodeling, deep learning behavior analysis, and quantification of hand movements were the core frontiers in recent years. Emergence analysis indicated that research was evolving towards neuroimaging assessment, precise quantification of motor function, and exploration of brain mechanisms. Conclusion: The field’s research has continued to deepen over the past five years, with China being the core research country. In the future, it is necessary to strengthen international collaboration, promote the in-depth integration of neural remodeling mechanism research and intelligent rehabilitation technology, and enhance the level of precise rehabilitation intervention.
文章引用:张丹, 包卓华, 钟星杰. 基于CiteSpace的脑梗死运动康复研究热点与 前沿分析(2021~2025)[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(4): 2184-2193. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1641465

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 脑血管病防治指南(2024年版) [J]. 磁共振成像, 2025, 16(1): 1-8.
[2] Tao, Q., Chao, H., Fang, D. and Dou, D. (2024) Progress in Neurorehabilitation Research and the Support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China from 2010 to 2022. Neural Regeneration Research, 19, 226-232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Watkins, K.E., Levack, W.M.M., Rathore, F.A. and C. Hay-Smith, E.J. (2023) Challenges in Applying Evidence-Based Practice in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Description of Health Professional Experience in Low, Middle, and High-Income Countries. Disability and Rehabilitation, 46, 3577-3585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Falaschi, D., Stagg, C. and Sel, A. (2025) Promoting Motor Recovery after Stroke Using Cortico-Cortical Paired Associative Stimulation. eClinicalMedicine, 88, 103473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Gandhi, D.B.C., Mascarenhas, R., Zarreen, S., Chawla, N.S., Pandian, J.D., English, C., et al. (2025) Bridging the Gap: Unique Strategies to Improve Access and Implementation of Stroke Rehabilitation in LMICs—A Scoping Review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 47, 6851-6863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Zhang, Y., Gong, G., Liu, G., Xu, S. and Zeng, J. (2025) Functional Connectivity between Non-Motor and Motor Networks Predicts Motor Recovery Changes after Stroke. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 41448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Aziz, M., Baig, S., Hai, W., Ali, A., Majid, A. and Su, L. (2025) Systematic Review: Resting State Functional MRI as a Biomarker for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Upper Limb Recovery Post-Stroke. Neurological Sciences, 46, 4233-4257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Shi, J., Wang, H., Gou, H., Chen, Y., He, J., Qu, Y., et al. (2025) Construction of a Deep-Learning-Based Rehabilitation Prediction Model for Lower-Limb Motor Dysfunction after Stroke Using Synchronous EEG-EMG and fMRI. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 19, Article ID: 1616957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Lin, X., Li, H., Chen, N. and Wu, X. (2025) Network Meta-Analysis of 4 Rehabilitation Methods with rTMS on Upper Limb Function and Daily Activities in Patients with Stroke. Stroke, 56, 2644-2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Teasell, R., Safaei-Qomi, M.R., Fleet, J.L., Dukelow, S.P., Murie-Fernandez, M., Harnett, A., et al. (2025) Comparing the Characteristics of Randomized Controlled Trials of Poststroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Low-Middle-Income and High-Income Countries. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 104, 755-761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Yang, B., Gong, E., Chen, X., Tan, J., Peoples, N., Li, Y., et al. (2025) Economic Evaluation of a Multicomponent mHealth Intervention for Stroke Management in Rural China: Cluster-Randomized Trial with 6-Year Follow-Up. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 13, e75326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Jesuthasan, A., Maung, M., Ajina, S. and Warburton, E. (2025) Rehabilitation Guidelines in Stroke. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 86, 1-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Liu, S., Li, M., Ding, J., Ji, Q., Niu, Y., Yang, X., et al. (2025) Effectiveness, Feasibility, Acceptability, and Safety of Digital Interventions in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 106, 1912-1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]