产业链协同视角下的有色金属企业ESG对企业的效应研究——以洛阳钼业为例
Research on the Effects of ESG on Non-Ferrous Metal Enterprises from the Perspective of Industrial Chain Collaboration—Taking the CMOC Group as an Example
摘要: 在“双碳”目标与全球供应链重构背景下,有色金属行业长期受困于资源禀赋错配、中游产能臃肿及周期波动剧烈等结构性矛盾,亟需通过产业链与ESG的深度融合实现转型。研究以洛阳钼业为典型案例,运用过程追踪法与扎根理论三级编码,基于2019~2024年多源数据,聚焦收购IXM与刚果(金)社区纠纷两大标志性事件,系统解构ESG实践在产业链协同中的效应生成机制。研究发现:ESG协同呈现差异化释放特征——环境维度实现“成本内化→价值外溢”跃迁,清洁能源改造经下游碳足迹追溯转化为绿色溢价;社会维度发挥“风险阻隔 + 信任传导”功能,社区共建使产能损失骤降,区域品牌声誉反哺跨业务线的客户转化;治理维度达成“信息损耗压缩 + 风险感知升级”效能,套期保值工具缓冲利润降幅。产业链协同是ESG效应放大的结构性载体,收购IXM打通“矿山–贸易”梗阻,使环境价值得以在销售终端兑现;危机处置中从“合规导向”向“发展导向”的逻辑切换,是跨国矿企获取东道国社会合法性的关键拐点。本研究首次将绿色知识溢出效应纳入协同效应评估体系,揭示了非财务信息通过信任强化机制提升产业链韧性的内在规律,为有色金属企业构建ESG驱动的全球供应链体系提供了理论参照与实践指南。
Abstract: Under the backdrop of the “dual carbon” goals and the restructuring of the global supply chain, the non-ferrous metals industry has long been plagued by structural contradictions such as resource endowment mismatches, bloated midstream capacity, and severe cyclical fluctuations. There is an urgent need to achieve transformation through the deep integration of the industrial chain and ESG. This study takes the CMOC Group as a typical case, using the process tracing method and grounded theory’s three-level coding. Based on multi-source data from 2019 to 2024, it focuses on two landmark events: the acquisition of IXM and community disputes in the Democratic Republic of Congo, systematically deconstructing the mechanism through which ESG practices generate effects in industrial chain collaboration. The study finds that ESG collaboration exhibits differentiated release characteristics—the environmental dimension achieves a “cost internalization → value spillover” transition, where clean energy transformation is converted into a green premium through downstream carbon footprint tracing; the social dimension performs the functions of “risk isolation + trust transmission”, with community co-construction sharply reducing capacity losses, and regional brand reputation feeding back to cross-business line customer conversion; the governance dimension achieves the effectiveness of “information loss compression + risk perception upgrading”, with hedging tools buffering profit declines. Industrial chain collaboration serves as a structural carrier for amplifying ESG effects; the acquisition of IXM unblocked the “mine-to-trade” bottleneck, allowing environmental value to be realized at the sales terminal. In crisis management, the shift in logic from “compliance-oriented” to “development-oriented” is a critical turning point for multinational mining enterprises to gain social legitimacy in host countries. This study is the first to incorporate the green knowledge spillover effect into the evaluation system of collaborative effects, revealing the inherent mechanism by which non-financial information enhances industrial chain resilience through trust reinforcement. It provides theoretical reference and practical guidance for non-ferrous metal enterprises in building an ESG-driven global supply chain system.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王龙丰, 孙健, 周一杰, 等. 可持续发展与ESG的概念溯源及辨析[J]. 会计之友, 2026(5): 39-45.
|
|
[2]
|
李百华, 董志良, 张璐. 全球废旧金属资源贸易演化特征与中国贸易选择[J]. 有色金属(冶炼部分), 2024(9): 133-141.
|
|
[3]
|
余桢旎, 付可, 姚铃. 数字贸易双循环背景下全球有色金属矿产品的出口贸易经济研究——《全球有色金属消费与进出口贸易研究》[J]. 有色金属工程, 2022, 12(11): 166.
|
|
[4]
|
谌飞龙, 王光华. 梯度培育政策下专精特新企业内生发展动力机制研究[J]. 当代财经, 2025(12): 114-128.
|
|
[5]
|
李彦丽, 苏日乐格. 战略联盟动态稳定性对零售企业可持续发展绩效的影响——基于协同效应理论[J]. 商业经济研究, 2025(17): 26-29.
|
|
[6]
|
Tian, X. and Ye, X. (2026) How Supply Chain Finance Impacts ESG Synergy across Supply Chains. Finance Research Letters, 87, Article ID: 109032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
贺远琼, 孟家琪. 企业数字责任: 研究综述与未来展望[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(9): 1-12.
|
|
[8]
|
周亚虹, 任欣怡. 企业社会责任信息披露质量对绿色创新持续性的影响研究——基于公共关注的利益相关者理论视角[J]. 经济纵横, 2025(11): 85-96.
|
|
[9]
|
郝皓, 吴寒, 周怡. 企业ESG实践与供应链韧性: 研究综述与展望[J]. 财会月刊, 2025, 46(16): 118-122.
|
|
[10]
|
郭晔, 赵昊, 陈海强. 社会责任承担、利益相关者支持与企业韧性[J]. 世界经济, 2025, 48(6): 123-155.
|
|
[11]
|
刘会芬. 绿色供应链利益相关者协同机制: 理论、挑战与优化路径[J]. 产业创新研究, 2025(22): 22-24.
|
|
[12]
|
杨帆. 有色金属行业财务特征分析及风险源研究[J]. 有色金属工程, 2022, 12(12): 161.
|
|
[13]
|
于淼. 有色金属行业财务特征及风险分析[J]. 有色金属工程, 2023, 13(4): 145.
|