市场状态与股价可预测性:基于深度学习模型的实证
Market Conditions and Predictability of Stock Prices: An Empirical Analysis Based on Deep Learning Models
摘要: 金融市场研究表明,股票价格的可预测性具有显著的时变性与状态依赖特征,市场运行机制会随着趋势转折、波动结构变化及外生冲击而发生阶段性调整;然而,现有基于深度学习的价格预测研究更多关注模型整体预测精度,对预测表现在不同市场阶段下的系统性差异缺乏专门分析,从而难以准确刻画预测可靠性的环境约束。基于此,文章以沪深300指数为研究对象,构建融合小波变换的LSTM-CNN混合预测模型,并在样本外框架下比较模型在不同市场阶段中的预测表现。实证结果显示,股票价格预测表现具有显著的阶段依赖性:在趋势相对明确、价格结构较为稳定的阶段预测误差显著较低,而在趋势转折或震荡特征突出的阶段预测可靠性明显下降,且上述差异在不同参数设定下具有稳健性。研究表明,股票价格预测模型的有效性高度依赖市场环境,对预测性能的评估有必要引入市场阶段视角,以更准确界定模型的适用边界与现实价值。
Abstract: Studies in financial markets suggest that the predictability of stock prices exhibits significant time variation and state dependence. The operating mechanism of financial markets will undergo stage-wise adjustments with bull-bear transitions, changes in volatility structures, and exogenous shocks. However, existing literature on stock price forecasting using deep learning focuses primarily on the overall forecasting accuracy of models, while lacking dedicated analyses of the systematic differences in forecasting performance across distinct market regimes. Consequently, it is difficult to accurately characterize the environmental constraints that affect forecasting reliability. Against this background, this paper takes the CSI 300 Index as the research object and constructs a hybrid LSTM-CNN prediction model integrated with wavelet transform. We then compare the out-of-sample forecasting performance of the model across different market stages. The empirical results show that stock price forecasting performance presents significant regime dependence: the prediction error is significantly lower in periods with relatively clear trends and stable price structures, whereas the forecasting reliability decreases substantially during trend reversals or high-volatility periods. These findings remain robust under different parameter settings. This study indicates that the effectiveness of stock price forecasting models is highly dependent on market conditions. It is necessary to incorporate the perspective of market stages into the evaluation of forecasting performance, so as to better identify the applicable boundaries and practical value of forecasting models.
文章引用:潘含笑. 市场状态与股价可预测性:基于深度学习模型的实证[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2026, 15(2): 403-412. https://doi.org/10.12677/fia.2026.152042

参考文献

[1] Fama, E.F. (1970) Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25, 383-417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] de Bondt, W.F.M. and Thaler, R. (1985) Does the Stock Market Overreact? The Journal of Finance, 40, 793-805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Jegadeesh, N. and Titman, S. (1993) Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48, 65-91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 李云红, 魏宇, 吴晓雄. 中国股票市场适应性特征的实证研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2016, 30(1): 72-79.
[5] 周孝华, 宋庆阳. 时变收益可预测性与适应性市场假说——来自中国股市的证据[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2015(4): 26-34.
[6] 周倜, 胡家啟, 李仲飞. 基于时变隐马尔可夫机制转换模型的多资产配置研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2025, 45(10): 3223-3244.
[7] 包双宝, 孙振, 凤兰. 基于吉布斯抽样的我国股票市场周期性研究[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2010(1): 20-21+46.
[8] 杨阳, 万迪昉. 不同市态下投资者情绪与股市收益、收益波动的异化现象——基于上证股市的实证分析[J]. 系统工程, 2010, 28(1): 19-23.
[9] 崔海蓉, 李铭, 储小俊. 中国股票市场羊群效应的非对称性研究[J]. 阅江学刊, 2023, 15(2): 123-134+174.
[10] 顾锋娟. 牛熊市波动非对称性与非预期交易量关系实证研究[J]. 财经问题研究, 2012(6): 49-54.
[11] 陈煜之, 李心悦, 方毅. 基于频率分解的机器学习模型预测效果比较[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(12): 29-34.
[12] 许伟河. 上证综合指数波动情况研究——基于滚动窗口的马尔科夫链预测模型[J]. 武汉金融, 2015(5): 22-24.
[13] 李俊儒, 汪寿阳, 魏云捷. 基于波动率测量误差的波动率预测模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(8): 1905-1918.
[14] 杨子晖, 陈里璇, 陈雨恬. 经济政策不确定性与系统性金融风险的跨市场传染——基于非线性网络关联的研究[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(1): 65-81.
[15] 方意, 于渤, 王炜. 新冠疫情影响下的中国金融市场风险度量与防控研究[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2020(8): 116-128.
[16] 李超杰, 郑凯鑫. 中国经济政策与金融市场波动的内在逻辑——基于大数据挖掘的视角[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2022(9): 49-61.
[17] 陈国进, 张润泽, 赵向琴. 经济政策不确定性与股票风险特征[J]. 管理科学学报, 2018, 21(4): 1-27.
[18] 潘长春, 王伟强. 经济政策不确定性与股票市场波动性之间的跨类及跨国关联: 来自中美两国的经验证据[J]. 世界经济研究, 2022(11): 89-105.