考虑不同权力结构下的双渠道供应链定价和绿色水平决策
Pricing and Green Level Decisions in Dual-Channel Supply Chains under Different Power Structures
摘要: 在数字经济时代,供应链渠道多元化趋势与绿色发展需求同步推进,企业也在双渠道竞争中面临价格与环境责任的双重决策挑战。本文聚焦于由单一供应商与单一电子零售商构成的双渠道供应链,在研究框架中纳入三种不同的权力结构(垂直纳什、电子零售商主导的Stackelberg和供应商主导的Stackelberg),并将绿色水平决策纳入双渠道竞争分析体系,深入探讨供应链成员价格决策和绿色水平决策问题。利用Stackelberg博弈,本文确定了三种模型下的均衡解。研究发现:权力结构不仅决定了利润分配格局,更深刻影响着绿色创新动力和整体渠道效率,其中电子零售商主导的结构(ES)最有利于实现供应链总利润最大化。
Abstract: In the era of the digital economy, the trend toward diversified supply chain channels is advancing in tandem with the demand for green development, and firms face the dual decision-making challenge of pricing and environmental responsibility in the context of dual-channel competition. This paper focuses on a dual-channel supply chain consisting of a single supplier and a single e-retailer, incorporating three distinct power structures—Vertical Nash, E-retailer-led Stackelberg, and Supplier-led Stackelberg—into the analytical framework, and integrates green level decisions into the analysis of dual-channel competition. The study delves into the pricing decisions and green level decisions of supply chain members. Using Stackelberg game theory, the equilibrium solutions under the three models are derived. The findings reveal that the power structure not only determines the distribution pattern of profits but also profoundly influences green innovation incentives and overall channel efficiency, with the e-retailer-led structure (ES) being the most conducive to maximizing total supply chain profit.
文章引用:张婷. 考虑不同权力结构下的双渠道供应链定价和绿色水平决策[J]. 应用数学进展, 2026, 15(4): 464-475. https://doi.org/10.12677/aam.2026.154174

参考文献

[1] Tsay, A.A. and Agrawal, N. (2004) Modeling Conflict and Coordination in Multi-Channel Distribution Systems: A Review. In: Simchi-Levi, D., Wu, S.D. and Shen, Z.J., Eds., International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer, 557-606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Chiang, W.K., Chhajed, D. and Hess, J.D. (2003) Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Supply-Chain Design. Management Science, 49, 1-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Cai, G., Zhang, Z.G. and Zhang, M. (2009) Game Theoretical Perspectives on Dual-Channel Supply Chain Competition with Price Discounts and Pricing Schemes. International Journal of Production Economics, 117, 80-96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Jabarzare, N. and Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2020) A Game Theoretic Approach for Pricing and Determining Quality Level through Coordination Contracts in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain Including Manufacturer and Packaging Company. International Journal of Production Economics, 221, Article 107480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Liu, Z., Anderson, T.D. and Cruz, J.M. (2012) Consumer Environmental Awareness and Competition in Two-Stage Supply Chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 218, 602-613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Luo, Z., Chen, X. and Wang, X. (2016) The Role of Co-Opetition in Low Carbon Manufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research, 253, 392-403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Zhu, W. and He, Y. (2017) Green Product Design in Supply Chains under Competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 258, 165-180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Wang, J., Chang, J. and Wu, Y. (2020) The Optimal Production Decision of Competing Supply Chains When Considering Green Degree: A Game-Theoretic Approach. Sustainability, 12, Article 7413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Luo, Z., Chen, X., Chen, J. and Wang, X. (2017) Optimal Pricing Policies for Differentiated Brands under Different Supply Chain Power Structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 259, 437-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Choi, S.C. (1991) Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer. Marketing Science, 10, 271-296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Esmaeeli, Z., Mollaverdi, N. and Safarzadeh, S. (2024) A Game Theoretic Approach for Green Supply Chain Management in a Big Data Environment Considering Cost-Sharing Models. Expert Systems with Applications, 257, Article 124989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Hu, X., Cai, J. and Yue, X. (2024) Power Structure Preferences in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain: Demand Information Symmetry vs. Asymmetry. European Journal of Operational Research, 314, 920-934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Lee, E. and Minner, S. (2024) How Power Structure and Markup Schemes Impact Supply Chain Channel Efficiency under Price-Dependent Stochastic Demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 318, 297-309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Lu, L. and Menezes, M.B.C. (2024) Supply Chain Vertical Competition and Product Proliferation under Different Power Structures. International Journal of Production Economics, 267, Article 109097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Xu, X., He, P., Xu, H. and Zhang, Q. (2017) Supply Chain Coordination with Green Technology under Cap-and-Trade Regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 433-442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Ma, X., Mao, J., Luo, Q. and Bai, Q. (2024) Effects of Information Superiority and Green Optimism on Green Supply Chains under Different Power Structures. International Journal of Production Economics, 268, Article 109105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 陈克兵, 孔颖琪, 雷东. 考虑消费者偏好及渠道权力的可替代产品供应链的定价和绿色投入决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(5): 1-10.