风险评估理论演进:风险评估到风险治理
The Evolution of Risk Assessment Theory: From Risk Assessment to Risk Governance
DOI: 10.12677/mm.2026.164072, PDF,   
作者: 冉雨涵:华南理工大学公共管理学院,广东 广州
关键词: 危机与风险风险评估风险治理Crisis and Risk Risk Assessment Risk Governance
摘要: 本文综述了风险评估理论的发展历程和在公共管理中的应用。文章首先概述了风险管理学科的起源,从企业管理到公共部门和社会治理领域的扩展。接着,文章对危机与风险的概念进行了辨析,讨论了风险评估的多维性和主观性。在风险评估理论的梳理中,介绍了多种风险评估工具和技术,并强调了风险评估整合性框架的必要性。文章还探讨了风险治理中的社会影响评估,并指出在中国,社会风险评估正在逐步得到重视和发展。最后,文章提出了风险评估的未来发展方向,包括加强跨学科合作和提高评估的科学性与实用性。通过这些措施,风险评估将更好地服务于公共管理,为决策提供准确的支持。
Abstract: This paper reviews the development of risk assessment theory and its application in public administration. It first outlines the origins of risk management as a discipline, tracing its expansion from corporate management to the public sector and social governance. Subsequently, the paper distinguishes between the concepts of crisis and risk, discussing the multidimensional and subjective nature of risk assessment. In examining risk assessment theories, it introduces various risk assessment tools and techniques, emphasizing the necessity of an integrated risk assessment framework. The paper also explores social impact assessment within risk governance, noting that social risk assessment is gradually gaining prominence and development in China. Finally, it proposes future directions for risk assessment, including strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration and enhancing the scientific rigor and practical utility of assessments. Through these measures, risk assessment will better serve public administration by providing accurate support for decision-making.
文章引用:冉雨涵. 风险评估理论演进:风险评估到风险治理[J]. 现代管理, 2026, 16(4): 15-21. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2026.164072

参考文献

[1] Hermann, C.F. (1963) Some Consequences of Crisis Which Limit the Viability of Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8, 61-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Booth, S.A. (1993) Crisis Management Strategy: Competition and Change in Modern Enterprises. Routledge.
[3] Coombs, W.T. (2007) Protecting Organization Reputations during a Crisis: The Development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 163-176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Heath, R.L. (1998) New Communication Technologies: An Issues Management Point of View. Public Relations Review, 24, 273-288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Olsson, E. (2014) Crisis Communication in Public Organisations: Dimensions of Crisis Communication Revisited. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 22, 113-125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Royal Society (1992) Risk: Analysis, Perception and Management. Report of a Royal Society Study Group, Royal Society, London.
[7] Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., et al. (2003) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disaster. 2nd Edition, Routledge.
[8] Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. (1982) How Can We Know the Risks We Face? Why Risk Selection Is a Social Process. Risk Analysis, 2, 49-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Renn, O. (2005) White Paper on Risk Governance: Towards an Integrative Approach. International Risk Governance Council.
[10] Carson, R. (2002) Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin Company.
[11] Peter, J.P. and Tarpey, S.L.X. (1975) A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 29-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Starr, C. (1969) Social Benefit versus Technological Risk. Science, 165, 1232-1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Kasperson, J.X., Kasperson, R.E., Pidgeon, N. and Slovic, P. (2003) The Social Amplification of Risk: Assessing Fifteen Years of Research and Theory. In: The Social Amplification of Risk, Cambridge University Press, 13-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Sowby, F.D. (1965) Radiation and Other Risks. Health Physics, 11, 879-887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Perrow, C. (1994) Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Basic Books.
[16] Lancaster, J. (1996) Engineering Catastrophes—Causes and Effects of Major Accidents. Abington Publishing.
[17] Vaughan, D. (1996) The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Hurst, N. (1998) Risk Assessment: The Human Dimension. The Royal Society of Chemistry.
[19] Vanclay, F. (2002) Conceptualising Social Impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22, 183-211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Wolf, C.P. (1983) Social Impact Assessment: The State of the Art. In: Environmental Impact Assessment, Springer Netherlands, 391-401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 史玲玲. 社会影响评价: 理论, 方法与实证[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2017.