中国与南亚东南亚国家反垄断合作机制研究
Research on the Anti-Monopoly Cooperation Mechanism between China and South Asian and Southeast Asian Countries
摘要: 在区域经贸合作持续深化与RCEP全面生效的背景下,我国与南亚、东南亚国家之间的投资、贸易、平台经营和供应链协同不断加深,跨境限制竞争行为的识别、调查与救济因此面临更强的跨法域联动需求。围绕这一现实变化,结合RCEP竞争章节、东盟竞争政策文件以及企业境外反垄断合规指引等规范文本,运用规范分析、比较研究与法经济学分析方法,对数字平台、跨境并购和供应链合作等场景中的竞争治理问题进行考察。区域反垄断合作虽已具备一定的规则基础,但在制度衔接和实施层面仍存在不少障碍,主要表现为规则差异仍然明显、信息交换机制不够顺畅、数字证据跨境获取难度较大、现有争端解决安排约束力有限,以及企业合规尚未形成有效的区域联动效应。基于此,未来应在尊重各国制度差异和发展阶段的前提下,逐步推进规则协调,强化数字监管协同与执法能力建设,并通过企业合规体系的完善,把政府间合作与市场主体治理更好衔接起来,进而形成较为稳定的跨境反垄断治理框架。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of deepening regional economic and trade cooperation and the full implementation of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), investment, trade, platform operations, and supply chain coordination between China and South Asian and Southeast Asian countries have become increasingly integrated. As a result, the identification, investigation, and remediation of cross-border anticompetitive conduct now require stronger cross-jurisdictional coordination. In response to these developments, this study draws on the competition chapter of the RCEP, ASEAN competition policy documents, and corporate overseas anti-monopoly compliance guidelines, and employs normative analysis, comparative research, and law-and-economics methods to examine competition governance issues arising in such scenarios as digital platforms, cross-border mergers and acquisitions, and supply chain cooperation. Although regional anti-monopoly cooperation has already developed a certain normative foundation, significant obstacles remain at the levels of institutional coordination and practical implementation. These are mainly reflected in substantial differences among competition rules, insufficiently smooth information-sharing mechanisms, difficulties in obtaining cross-border digital evidence, the limited binding force of existing dispute settlement arrangements, and the lack of an effective regional synergy in corporate compliance. Accordingly, future efforts should, while respecting differences in legal systems and stages of development among countries, gradually promote rule coordination, strengthen cooperation in digital regulation and enforcement capacity building, and improve corporate compliance systems so as to better connect intergovernmental cooperation with market-based governance, thereby forming a relatively stable framework for cross-border anti-monopoly governance.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
娄卫阳. RCEP争端解决机制中特殊与差别待遇条款: 意义、挑战与路径[J]. 太平洋学报, 2021, 29(11): 26-39.
|
|
[2]
|
沈铭辉. RCEP在推动东亚区域合作中的作用与新课题[J]. 东北亚论坛, 2022, 31(1): 117-126.
|
|
[3]
|
徐梅. RCEP签署与亚太区域经济一体化前景[J]. 东北亚论坛, 2021, 30(5): 56-67+127.
|
|
[4]
|
周汉华. 论平台经济反垄断与监管的二元分治[J]. 中国法学, 2023(1): 222-240.
|
|
[5]
|
殷继国. 互联网平台封禁行为的反垄断法规制[J]. 现代法学, 2021, 43(4): 143-155.
|
|
[6]
|
李三希, 张明圣, 陈煜. 中国平台经济反垄断: 进展与展望[J]. 改革, 2022(6): 62-75.
|
|
[7]
|
周文, 韩文龙. 平台经济发展再审视: 垄断与数字税新挑战[J]. 中国社会科学, 2021(3): 103-118.
|
|
[8]
|
Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (2018) Grab-Uber Merger: CCCS Imposes Directions on Parties to Restore Market Contestability and Penalties to Deter Anti-Competitive Mergers. https://www.ccs.gov.sg/media-and-events/newsroom/announcements-and-media-releases/grab-uber-merger--cccs-imposes-directions-on-parties-to-restore-market-contestability-and-penalties-to-deter-anti-competitive-mergers/
|
|
[9]
|
Competition Commission of India (2020) Delhi Vyapar Mahasangh and Flipkart Internet Private Limited and ors. Case No. 40/2019, Order Dated 13/01/2020. https://www.cci.gov.in/antitrust/orders/details/110/0
|
|
[10]
|
陈伟光, 王燕. 共建“一带一路”: 基于关系治理与规则治理的分析框架[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2016(6): 93-112+158-159.
|
|
[11]
|
OECD (2022) International Cooperation on Competition Investigations and Proceedings: Progress in Implementing the 2014 OECD Recommendation. OECD Publishing.
|