论远程办公模式下劳动基准适用与劳资利益的法律衡平研究
On the Application of Labor Standards and the Legal Equilibrium of Interests between Labor and Management in the Context of Telework
DOI: 10.12677/ojls.2026.144097, PDF,   
作者: 刘茹婷:宁波大学马克思主义学院,浙江 宁波
关键词: 远程办公劳动基准劳资利益Telework Labor Standards Interests of Labor and Management
摘要: 数字经济的发展与公共卫生事件的催化,推动远程办公从非常规用工转向常态化、多元化,其灵活性既降低企业经营成本,也赋予劳动者时空自主权。但远程办公打破传统用工“固定场所、固定时段、集中管理”特征,使以传统模式为预设的劳动基准体系陷入适用困境,工时模糊、工资混乱、安全缺位、离线权受侵害等问题频发,加剧劳资失衡。劳动基准作为劳资权利义务的底线规则,其适用合理性关乎劳资和谐与数字经济健康发展。本文基于远程办公形态特征与实践困境,剖析基准适用冲突的核心成因,从立法、执法、司法、企业自治四维度,探索基准适用路径,实现劳资利益法律衡平,为数字时代劳动权益保障提供理论与实践支撑。
Abstract: The dual forces of digital economic expansion and the COVID-19 pandemic have propelled telework from an atypical employment arrangement into a normalized and diversified practice. Its inherent flexibility not only reduces operational costs for enterprises but also grants workers spatial and temporal autonomy. However, by disrupting the traditional paradigm of “fixed premises, fixed hours, and centralized management”, telework has rendered the existing labor standard system, which is predicated on conventional models, largely inapplicable. This has led to frequent issues such as ambiguities in working hour calculation, disorder in wage payment, absence of occupational safety, and infringement upon the right to disconnect, thereby exacerbating the imbalance between labor and management. As the fundamental rules defining the baseline rights and obligations of both parties, the proper application of labor standards is crucial for harmonious labor relations and the healthy development of the digital economy. This paper analyzes the core causes of this applicability conflict based on the characteristics and practical challenges of telework. It explores pathways for the application of labor standards from four dimensions—legislative refinement, enhanced enforcement, judicial standardization, and corporate self-governance—aiming to achieve a legal equilibrium between the interests of labor and management, and to provide theoretical and practical support for the protection of labor rights in the digital era.
文章引用:刘茹婷. 论远程办公模式下劳动基准适用与劳资利益的法律衡平研究[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(4): 99-107. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.144097

参考文献

[1] 朱晓峰. 数字时代劳动者权利保护论[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2020, 50(1): 37-55.
[2] 杨猛宗. “互联网+”劳动关系发展的新动向与认定标准建构[J]. 江西社会科学, 2025, 45(8): 131-143.
[3] 田思路, 童文娟. 远程劳动者权益保护探究: 以网络平台主播和居家办公形式为例[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2020, 37(6): 17-27.
[4] 牛骏儒. 远程办公形态下工作时间认定问题的初步思考[J]. 西部学刊, 2020(12): 26-29.
[5] 王竹, 帅仁策. 远程劳动者的权益保障: 困境与出路[J]. 南雍法律评论, 2025, 2(1): 3-25.
[6] 陈俊秀, 赖晨昕. 远程办公情境下工伤认定的理据反思与规则调适[J]. 中国劳动关系学院学报, 2025, 39(6): 63-72.
[7] 谢增毅. 离线权的法律属性与规则建构[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(11): 35-49.
[8] 傅溢. 互联网时代劳动者离线权制度保障[J]. 安徽警官职业学院学报, 2023, 22(6): 24-30+62.
[9] 张俊豪. 数字时代远程办公劳动者的隐私权保障研究[J]. 太原城市职业技术学院学报, 2022(3): 197-201.
[10] 丁昊伟. 居家办公模式下的劳动者隐私权保护[J]. 中国社会保障, 2024(4): 70-71.
[11] 徐佳. 远程办公之劳动法律问题对策研究[J]. 重庆广播电视大学学报, 2021, 33(6): 62-69.
[12] 谢增毅. 远程工作的立法理念与制度建构[J]. 中国法学, 2021(1): 248-268.
[13] 邓媛媛. 数字时代远程办公劳动者权益保障研究[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2024(16): 157-160.
[14] 杨婷婷. 浅析远程居家办公劳动者的工伤认定问题[J]. 经营管理者, 2022(7): 62-63.
[15] 张文. 远程工作中的劳动保护法律问题研究[J]. 兰州教育学院学报, 2018, 34(8): 145-148.