“小先生制”激活数据思维:陶行知教育思想下高中生数据实践能力培养研究
“Little Teacher System” Activates Data Thinking: Research on the Cultivation of High School Students’ Data Practice Ability under Tao Xingzhi’s Educational Thought
摘要: 在大数据时代背景下,培养学生的数据思维已成为核心素养导向下数学教育的重要任务。本文以高中《简单随机抽样》单元教学为载体,探索基于陶行知“小先生制”理念的数据思维培养路径。通过构建以学生为主体、以小组合作为依托的教学模式,激发学生参与意识,强化其在数据收集、整理、分析、解释等过程中的实践能力与批判性思维,为高中数学课堂改革提供了可行性实践范式。
Abstract: In the context of the big data era, cultivating students’ data thinking has become an important task in mathematics education under the guidance of core literacy. This article takes the teaching of the “Simple Random Sampling” unit in high school as a carrier and explores the path of cultivating data thinking based on the “Little Teacher System” concept of Tao Xingzhi. By constructing a teaching model with students as the main body and group cooperation as the support, it stimulates students’ participation awareness and strengthens their practical ability and critical thinking in the processes of data collection, organization, analysis, and interpretation, providing a feasible practical model for the reform of high school mathematics classrooms.
文章引用:何家伟. “小先生制”激活数据思维:陶行知教育思想下高中生数据实践能力培养研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(4): 471-476. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.164676

参考文献

[1] 杨佳凝. 促进高中数学生活化教学的探究[J]. 科普童话, 2019(39): 106.
[2] 闫安. 陶行知“小先生制”在高中数学教学中的应用[J]. 高考, 2017(9): 90.
[3] 高梦湘, 夏鸿鸣. “先学后教”在高中数学教学中的应用探究[J]. 数学学习与研究, 2023(30): 14-16.
[4] 吴静. “小先生制”在高中数学课堂中的应用初探[J]. 中学数学研究, 2023(7): 1-4.
[5] 贾留萍. 高中数学生活化教学设计研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 固原: 宁夏师范学院, 2024.
[6] Witte, V., Schwering, A. and Frischemeier, D. (2024) Strengthening Data Literacy in K-12 Education: A Scoping Review. Education Sciences, 15, Article 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Hernandez-Serrano, M.J., Zerwas, F., Matuk, C., Chatufale, G., Ochoa, X. and Dikker, S. (2024) Evaluation of Data Literacy Frameworks and a Self-Data Curriculum for High School Students. 2024 21st International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), Paris, 6-8 November 2024, 1-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Louie, J., Stiles, J., Fagan, E., Chance, B. and Roy, S. (2022) Building toward Critical Data Literacy with Investigations of Income Inequality. Educational Technology & Society, 25, 142-163.
[9] Watson, J. and Callingham, R. (2003) Statistical Literacy: A Complex Hierarchical Construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2, 3-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Wild, C.J. and Pfannkuch, M. (1999) Statistical Thinking in Empirical Enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67, 223-248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Ben-Zvi, D., Makar, K. and Garfield, J. (2018) International Handbook of Research in Statistics Education. Springer.
[12] Shaughnessy, J.M. (2007) Research in Probability and Statistics: Reflections and Directions. In: Grouws, D.A., Ed., Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Emerald Publishing Limited, 465-494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Mazur, E. (1997) Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. Prentice-Hall.
[14] Crouch, C.H. and Mazur, E. (2001) Peer Instruction: Ten Years of Experience and Results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970-977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Baltzersen, R.K. (2023) Effective Use of Collective Peer Teaching in Teacher Education: Maximizing Student Learning. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Knight, J.K. and Brame, C.J. (2018) Peer Instruction. CBELife Sciences Education, 17, fe5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]