论数字治理的作用机理、效果及现实进路
On the Mechanism, Effects, and Practical Pathways of Digital Governance
摘要: 数字治理是运用数据和数字技术实现国家治理的策略,也包括对数字技术进行治理。数字治理的现实基础是作为信息载体的数据与作为智慧形式的数字技术。数据在微观上能实现精准识别与行为分析,宏观上能为决策提供支持,而数字技术则提供了高效的信息处理方式和能力。从网络治理理论视角分析,数字治理作用于多元的主体与治理流程的各个环节,体现了多元主体协同治理的新特征。数字治理的优势在于能显著提升治理效率,实现批量决策与模拟预测,而其弊端在于高度依赖技术与算法,存在“模型崩溃”、忽视人文精神的风险,且根本上不能脱离人和规则。数字法治是数字治理的现实进路,能有效提升传统立法、执法、司法环节的效率,也可有效规制数字技术、数字经济与数字权力等新兴领域。
Abstract: Digital governance is a strategy that employs data and digital technologies to achieve state governance, encompassing also the governance of digital technologies themselves. The practical foundation of digital governance lies in data as information carriers and digital technologies as forms of intelligence. At the micro level, data enables precise identification and behavioral analysis; at the macro level, it supports decision-making. Digital technologies provide efficient methods and capabilities for information processing. From the perspective of network governance theory, digital governance operates on multiple subjects and every link of the governance process, reflecting a novel characteristic of collaborative governance among multiple subjects. The advantage of digital governance lies in its ability to significantly enhance governance efficiency, enabling batch decision-making and simulation predictions. However, its drawbacks include a heavy reliance on technology and algorithms, risks such as “model collapse”, a tendency to neglect humanistic considerations, and an inherent inability to operate independently of human actors and rules. The digital rule of law serves as the practical pathway of digital governance, effectively improving efficiency in traditional legislative, enforcement, and judicial processes, while also providing effective regulation for emerging areas such as digital technology, the digital economy, and digital power.
文章引用:沈龙杰. 论数字治理的作用机理、效果及现实进路[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(4): 199-205. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.124118

参考文献

[1] 杨建军. 数字治理的法治进路[J]. 比较法研究, 2023(5): 1-19.
[2] 赵娟, 孟天广. 数字政府的纵向治理逻辑: 分层体系与协同治理[J]. 学海, 2021(2): 90-99.
[3] 申卫星. 论数据用益权[J]. 中国社会科学, 2020(11): 110-131+207.
[4] 袁曾. 数据规模化利用的法律规制[J]. 地方立法研究, 2023, 8(5): 71-84.
[5] 胡键. “算法依赖症”及其对国家治理现代化的影响[J]. 国家现代化建设研究, 2023, 2(4): 135-148.
[6] 潘教峰. 新一代人工智能给国家治理带来新机遇[J]. 智慧中国, 2023(11): 28-29.
[7] 郭红建, 吴素萱. 基于“AI + RPA”的投资审计数据治理框架构建研究[J]. 软件导刊, 2023, 22(3): 1-9.
[8] 贾宇. 论数字法院[J]. 法学研究, 2024, 46(4): 3-20.
[9] 甄航. 人工智能介入量刑机制: 困境、定位与解构[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 29(4): 191-202.
[10] 宋保振. “数字弱势群体”权利及其法治化保障[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2020, 38(6): 53-64.
[11] Gibson, J. (2023) Page against the Machine: The Death of the Author and the Rise of the Producer? Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 13, 275-284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 步凌燕. 数字社会法治转型的方法论应对——基于法外因素视角的分析[J]. 甘肃开放大学学报, 2022, 32(5): 59-62+67.
[13] 李红权, 赵忠璐. 数字权力的兴起、扩张及治理[J]. 江汉论坛, 2023(9): 113-119.
[14] 黄丽云. 数字社会的伦理困境与法治文化建设[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2022(2): 12-19.
[15] 马长山. 数字法治的三维面向[J]. 北大法律评论, 2020, 21(2): 63-76.
[16] 马长山. 数字治理的法治考量[J]. 数字法学评论, 2025(1): 1-25.
[17] 李忠操. 数字法治的法理解析: 形式、实质与程序[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2023, 34(4): 38-52.
[18] 钱弘道, 康兰平, 申辉. 数字法治的基本原理和实践进路[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, 52(9): 5-24.
[19] 马长山. 面向“三维世界”的数字法学[J]. 中国社会科学, 2024(11): 145-163+207.
[20] 黄文艺. 数字法治是现代法治新形态[J]. 数字法治, 2023(2): 1-6.
[21] 张效羽, 鲍静. 数字中国的法治保障[J]. 信息技术与管理应用, 2023, 2(6): 1-10.